Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lmj Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$648kReligion$299kHealth$128kHousing & Shelter$42kHuman Services$35kArts & Culture$31kSocial Science$23kPhilanthropy$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$525k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY$33,000
NEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES$10,000
OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS$10,000
DIVINE SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCH$10,000
LCMS WORLD MISSIONS$2,500
GRACE POINT INSTITUTE FOR RELATIONAL HEALTH$2,500
LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES$2,500
CONCORDIA LUTHERAN SCHOOLS OF OMAHA$2,250
LUTHERAN HOUR MINISTRIES$2,000
NEBRASKA JOURNALISM TRUST$1,000
COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
WE RAISE FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CAMP HIGH HOPES: $500 → 13%PROJECT HOPE INC: $1k → 12%PROJECT HOPE: $1k → 12%PROJECT HOPE: $1k → 12%PROJECT HOPE: $1k → 12%PROJECT HOPE: $1k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $7k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 12%NEBRASKA CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY: $100 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 25 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
13

Total granted

$1.2M
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
-11%

Still filing today

52%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationReligionHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $298k · revenue +19%
  • GI
    GRACEPOINT INSTITUTE FOR RELATIONAL HEALTH
    4× · 2022–2025 · $127k · revenue +7% · 71% of their budget
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $44k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • GP
    GRACE POINTE INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • LH
    LUTHERAN HIGH NORTHEAST
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -59%
  • VA
    VILLISCA ALUMNI AND FRIENDS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
2
Nebraska Credit Union League Inc

To promote credit unions in nebraska

—
3
Nebraska Realtors Association

Unite realtor boards to be able to influence matters affecting real estate state wide, unify laws and regulations and promote education among members

—
4
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
5
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
6
Lutheran Family Services Foundation Inc

To educate, inspire, motivate and assist stakeholders in developing gifts supporting the human care provided by lutheran family services of nebraska, inc.

Human Services
7
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
8
Omaha Church Center Inc

None

—
9
Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation

The council of indepependent nebraska colleges foundation exists to provide operating funds and scholarship support for students attending nebraska's independent institutions of excellence.

—
10
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
11
Catholic Charities Foundation

Support the mission and social services programs of catholic charities of the archdiocese of omaha, inc.

Religion
12
Concord Mediation Center

Organized for the purpose of assisting individuals and groups in the resolution and management of conflicts, promoting public awareness and understanding of alternative dispute resolutions, providing educational materials, workshops and…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Visiting Nurse Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Rupert Dunklau Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
13/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONCORDIA LUTHERAN SCHOOLS OF OMAHA INC: $301,250 · OtherCONCORDIA LUTHERAN SCHOOLS OF OMAHA INCST MARK LUTHERAN CHURCH: $146,000 · OtherST MARK LUTHERAN CHURCHDIVINE SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCH: $48,000 · OtherDIVINE SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCHLCMS FOUNDATION: $32,000 · OtherNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES: $23,500 · Other+21 more: $113,450 · Other+21 moreCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $298,000 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITYCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARY: $44,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARY+1 more: $5,000 · EducationGRACEPOINT INSTITUTE FOR RELATIONAL HEALTH: $127,200 · ReligionGRACEPOINT I…WE RAISE FOUNDATION: $14,500 · ReligionWE RAISE FOU…SHELTERING TREE INC: $41,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC: $28,250 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOPE INC: $5,000 · Human Services+2 more: $600 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS: $17,000 · PhilanthropyOmaha Community Foundation: $2,500 · PhilanthropyJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $15,750 · Arts & Culture
Other$664,200Education$347,000Religion$141,700Housing & Shelter$42,000Human Services$33,850Philanthropy$19,500Arts & Culture$15,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $298,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGRACEPOINT INSTITUTE FOR RELATIONAL HEALTH: $127,200 over 4y, 71% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARY: $44,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSHELTERING TREE INC: $41,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC: $28,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES: $23,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS: $17,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $15,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWE RAISE FOUNDATION: $14,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGRACE INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOPE INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetLUTHERAN HIGH NORTHEAST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADULT EDUCATION CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNEBRASKA JOURNALISM TRUST: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VISITING NURSE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP HIGH HOPES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOMAHA PRESS CLUB INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEBRASKA CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GRACEPOINT INSTITUTE FOR RELATIONAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERING TREE INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds JOSLYN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds WE RAISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GRACE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN HIGH NORTHEAST ↗
  • Who funds ORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Omaha Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ADULT EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA JOURNALISM TRUST ↗
  • Who funds RUPERT DUNKLAU FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE VISITING NURSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMP HIGH HOPES ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA PRESS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationNE23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Cl Werner Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Seline Family Foundation · Assurity Life Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Spreetail Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lmj Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lmj Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lmj Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Lmj Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lmj’s filings →

    More from the funding graph