Skip to content

· Public charity

Lmc Legacy Foundation

To promote hope, healing and wholeness through innovative and integrative behavioral healthcare resources that nurture mental health and resilience.

$319k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$372kHealth$346kHuman Services$258kInternational$144kHousing & Shelter$106kCrime & Legal$105kEducation$79kEmployment$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $152k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $160k
$35,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAFE COMMUNITIES$60,000
ASANTY COMMUNITY AND UMOJA BUS CTR$50,000
HOPE SERVED INC$50,000
PARISH RESOURCE CENTER INC$37,620
RIPPLE COMMUNITY INC$35,000
MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA$25,000
WE RISE INTERNATIONAL$24,633
BF BBOY MINISTRIES$20,000
HABECKER MENNONITE CHURCH$10,000
RAISE 28 YOUTH SERVICES$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $384k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THE WELCOME PROJECT: $30k → 7%CAMPBELL COMMUNITY CENTER: $54k → 10%BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $6k → 11%HOPE SERVED INC: $50k → 9%EASTERN MENNONITE MISSIONS: $60k → 9%BRIDGE OF HOPE: $58k → 9%BRIDGE OF HOPE: $48k → 9%BRIDGE OF HOPE: $28k → 9%FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$778k · 8 repeat orgs$780k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +122% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
15

Total granted

$778k
$558k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+122%
+17%

Still filing today

75%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $222k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BO
    BRIDGE OF HOPE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $135k · revenue +122%
  • PR
    PARISH RESOURCE CENTER INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $113k · revenue +12%
  • HS
    HUMANITARIAN SOCIAL INNOVATIONS
    2× · 2020–2022 · $105k · revenue +257%

Funded once

  • CN
    Charity Navigatorgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue +80%
  • EN
    EVANA NETWORK
    one grant, 2019 · $59k
  • CC
    Campbell Community Center
    one grant, 2024 · $54k · revenue -99% · 54% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hope Philly Inc

Our mission is to provide a support system for men seeking to be free from addiction that fosters long-term success and well being. To this end, we provide housing for men that have come out of addiction. We provide life skills workshops,…

Health
2
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
3
Do Right Chrisitian Center

Our mission at Do Right Christian Church is to transform lives and communities

Religion
4
Philippians 3 13 Ministries

Transitional living for recovered addicts.

Health
5
Next Door Ministries

The organization's purpose is to provide resources for men taking the next steps from recovery to a sustainable lifestyle. Our goal is to create a path to success for men struggling with a broken life pattern by providing a Christ-centered…

Religion
6
Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery

See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…

Health
7
Lancaster Harm Reduction Project Inc
Health
8
Rockbridge Recovery

Rockbridge Recovery supports individuals, families, and communities touched by addictive behaviors through support from peers, prevention, and education.

Health
9
NETwork Ministries Inc

Our mission is to share the love of Christ with those who are most vulnerable in our community. We especially seek to equip children and young adults with the skills necessary for spiritual growth, academic achievement, life management,…

Human Services
10
Revive Inc

Empowering individuals on their journey to lasting recovery. our team of dedicated professionals offer a dynamic blend of therapeutic support and personal empowerment. we dont just offer recovery; we provide a roadmap to your vibrant…

Health
11
Davids Hope

To assist individuals recovering from addiction, implement lifestyle changes, gain employment and housing

Health
12
Pa Treatment & Healing

The mission of pa treatment & healing is to guide people on a path to change through quality counseling, treatment and education. this is accomplished by providing a comprehensive individual and family centered, values oriented treatment…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bridge of Hope Inc; the most unlike its peers is Campbell Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LANCASTER MENNONITE CONFERENCE: $196,587 · OtherLANCASTER MENNONITE CONFERENCEEastern Mennonite University: $79,241 · OtherEastern Mennonite UniversityEVANA NETWORK: $59,400 · OtherEVANA NETWORKHABECKER MENNONITE CHURCH: $50,360 · OtherHABECKER MENNONITE CHURCHASANTY COMMUNITY AND UMOJA BUSINESS CENTER INC: $50,000 · OtherASANTY COMMUNITY AND UMOJA BUSINESS CENTER …PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $38,833 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITYWEST END MENNONITE FELLOWSHIP: $25,000 · OtherSWAN SCALING WALLS A NOTE AT A TIME: $35,000 · OtherSWAN SCALING WALLS A NOTE AT A TIMELANDIS QUALITY LIVING: $30,000 · OtherTHE FACTORY MINISTRIES: $20,000 · Other+1 more: $7,000 · OtherBRIDGE OF HOPE INC: $134,529 · Human ServicesBRIDGE OF HOPE INCCharity Navigator: $60,000 · Human ServicesCharity NavigatorCampbell Community Center: $54,000 · Human ServicesCampbell Community CenterHOPE SERVED INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesHOPE SERVED INCFRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY: $50,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP COMMUNITYWELCOME PROJECT PA: $30,000 · Human ServicesWELCOME PROJECT PA+1 more: $5,500 · Human ServicesPARISH RESOURCE CENTER INC: $112,620 · ReligionPARISH RESOURCE …TRANSITION TO COMMUNITY: $50,000 · ReligionTRANSITION TO CO…NEW PERSON MINISTRIES INC: $45,000 · ReligionNEW PERSON MINIS…BF BBOY MINISTRIES: $20,000 · ReligionBF BBOY MINISTRI…HUMANITARIAN SOCIAL INNOVATIONS: $105,000 · InternationalHUMANITARIA…We Rise Inc: $49,266 · InternationalWe Rise IncMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF LANCASTER COUNTY: $50,000 · HealthGOAL PROJECT INC: $35,000 · HealthPHILHAVEN: $20,000 · HealthSAFE COMMUNITIES: $60,000 · Crime & LegalRIPPLE COMMUNITY INC: $35,000 · Community Improvement
Other$591,421Human Services$384,029Religion$227,620International$154,266Health$105,000Crime & Legal$60,000Community Improvement$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRIDGE OF HOPE INC: $134,529 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetPARISH RESOURCE CENTER INC: $112,620 over 2y, 16% of budgetHUMANITARIAN SOCIAL INNOVATIONS: $105,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetEastern Mennonite University: $79,241 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCharity Navigator: $60,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCampbell Community Center: $54,000 over 1y, 54% of budgetFRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF LANCASTER COUNTY: $50,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetWe Rise Inc: $49,266 over 2y, 69% of budgetNEW PERSON MINISTRIES INC: $45,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetGOAL PROJECT INC: $35,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetRIPPLE COMMUNITY INC: $35,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetSWAN SCALING WALLS A NOTE AT A TIME: $35,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetLANDIS QUALITY LIVING: $30,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWELCOME PROJECT PA: $30,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTHE FACTORY MINISTRIES: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPHILHAVEN: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lancaster County Community FoundationPA29.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation · High Foundation · Clark Associates Charitable Foundation · Touchstone Foundation Supporting Organization · Pryor E & Arlene R Neuber Charitable Trust · United Way of Lancaster County · The Steinman Foundation · Anabaptist Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lmc Legacy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lmc Legacy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lmc Legacy Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lmc Legacy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lmc Legacy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph