· Public charity
Lmc Legacy Foundation
To promote hope, healing and wholeness through innovative and integrative behavioral healthcare resources that nurture mental health and resilience.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $152k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $160k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAFE COMMUNITIES | $60,000 |
| ASANTY COMMUNITY AND UMOJA BUS CTR | $50,000 |
| HOPE SERVED INC | $50,000 |
| PARISH RESOURCE CENTER INC | $37,620 |
| RIPPLE COMMUNITY INC | $35,000 |
| MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA | $25,000 |
| WE RISE INTERNATIONAL | $24,633 |
| BF BBOY MINISTRIES | $20,000 |
| HABECKER MENNONITE CHURCH | $10,000 |
| RAISE 28 YOUTH SERVICES | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $384k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +86% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $222k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BOBRIDGE OF HOPE INC3× · 2022–2024 · $135k · revenue +86%
- PRPARISH RESOURCE CENTER INC2× · 2022–2025 · $113k · revenue +12%
- HSHUMANITARIAN SOCIAL INNOVATIONS2× · 2020–2022 · $105k · revenue +257%
Funded once
- CNCharity Navigatorgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue +80%
- ENEVANA NETWORKone grant, 2019 · $59k
- CCCampbell Community Centerone grant, 2024 · $54k · revenue -99% · 54% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to provide a support system for men seeking to be free from addiction that fosters long-term success and well being. To this end, we provide housing for men that have come out of addiction. We provide life skills workshops,…
Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…
Our mission at Do Right Christian Church is to transform lives and communities
Transitional living for recovered addicts.
The organization's purpose is to provide resources for men taking the next steps from recovery to a sustainable lifestyle. Our goal is to create a path to success for men struggling with a broken life pattern by providing a Christ-centered…
See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…
Rockbridge Recovery supports individuals, families, and communities touched by addictive behaviors through support from peers, prevention, and education.
Our mission is to share the love of Christ with those who are most vulnerable in our community. We especially seek to equip children and young adults with the skills necessary for spiritual growth, academic achievement, life management,…
Empowering individuals on their journey to lasting recovery. our team of dedicated professionals offer a dynamic blend of therapeutic support and personal empowerment. we dont just offer recovery; we provide a roadmap to your vibrant…
To assist individuals recovering from addiction, implement lifestyle changes, gain employment and housing
The mission of pa treatment & healing is to guide people on a path to change through quality counseling, treatment and education. this is accomplished by providing a comprehensive individual and family centered, values oriented treatment…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bridge of Hope Inc and the most unlike its peers is Campbell Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 17% of your grantees by number, and just 18% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BRIDGE OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds PARISH RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANITARIAN SOCIAL INNOVATIONS ↗
- Who funds Eastern Mennonite University ↗
- Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
- Who funds SAFE COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds Campbell Community Center ↗
- Who funds HOPE SERVED INC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF LANCASTER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds TRANSITION TO COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds We Rise Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW PERSON MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds SWAN SCALING WALLS A NOTE AT A TIME ↗
- Who funds RIPPLE COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds GOAL PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds WELCOME PROJECT PA ↗
- Who funds LANDIS QUALITY LIVING ↗
- Who funds THE FACTORY MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds PHILHAVEN ↗
- Who funds BF BBOY MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds RAISE28 ↗
- Who funds BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation · High Foundation · Clark Associates Charitable Foundation · Touchstone Foundation Supporting Organization · Pryor E & Arlene R Neuber Charitable Trust · United Way of Lancaster County · The Steinman Foundation · Anabaptist Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lmc Legacy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Lmc Legacy Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Lmc Legacy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.