Loading…
· Private foundation
LIVINGSTON MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$520k
Granted FY2025
17
Grants
1
Communities
$210k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.
Health$3.1MHuman Services$56kOther$387k
02FY2025 · 17 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $93k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $390k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
- LIVINGSTON MEMORIAL VISITING NURSE$210,000
- WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC$180,000
- FREE CLINIC OF SIMI VALLEY$45,000
- PLANNED PARENTHOOD-CALIF CENTRAL CO$15,000
- HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION FOR VENTURA$12,500
- ST JOHN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$10,000
- COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$10,000
- RIDE ON THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP$9,000
- PROTOTYPES OXNARD$7,500
- COALITION FOR FAMILY HARMONY$4,000
- BRAIN INJURY CENTER OF VENTURA CNTY$2,500
- ANDREA'S FOUNDATION$2,500
- ADVENTIST HEALTH SIMI VALLEY$2,500
- HOSPICE OF THE CONEJO$2,500
- CAREGIVERS VOLUNTEERS ASSISTING THE$2,500
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.6M · 26 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else
26 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
26
6
Total granted
$3.6M
$17k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+29%
+83%
Still filing today
38%
17%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WFWESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC8× · 2018–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +503%
- FCFREE CLINIC OF SIMI VALLEY8× · 2018–2025 · $240k · revenue +179%
- HCHEALTH CARE FOUNDATION FOR VENTURA6× · 2020–2025 · $63k · revenue +15%
Funded once
- CVCAREGIVERS VOLUNTEERS ASSIST ELDERLone grant, 2018 · $5k
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LA- VC REGIONone grant, 2019 · $3k
INTERFACE CHILDREN FAMILY SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +83%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Via Care Community Health Center
Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.
Health
2
Ventura County Medical Resource
To improve, in partnership with others, access to needed health care for the most vulnerable and underserved children and seniors of ventura county.
Health
3
Central Valley Medical Center
Hospital services.
Health
4
Val Verde Hospital Corporation
We live to deliver healthcare our community can trust.
Health
5
Pajaro Valley Healthcare District
The organization has been formed by the community and governmental leaders to raise funds to form a hospital district in the County of Santa Cruz, CA that will purchase and operate Watsonville Community Hospital from its current owner and…
Health
6
Community Impact Central Valley
To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.
Health
7
Vista Community Clinic
The mission of Vista Community Clinic is to advance community health and hope by providing access to premier health services and education for those who need it most.
Health
8
Long Valley Health Center
Long Valley Health Center is a rural community federally qualified health clinic offering primary health care services, including physical examination, dental services, acupuncture, well baby check and immunizations. Long Valley Health…
Health
9
Goleta Valley Cottage Hospital
It is the mission of Goleta Valley Cottage Hospital to provide superior health care for and improve the health care of our communities through a commitment to our core values of excellence, integrity, and compassion.
Health
10
Cancer Support Community Valley
Cancer support community valley/ventura/santa barbaras mission is to uplift and strengthen people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.
—
11
Healing California
Provides free medical, dental and vision services to those in need in california.
Health
12
Family Healthcare Network
To provide health care services to socially and economically depressed sectors of the southern San Joaquin Valley in California.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Conejo Free Clinic and the most unlike its peers is Health Care Foundation for Ventura. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$3,142,200Other$386,780Human Services$55,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LIVINGSTON MEMORIAL VISITING NURSE ↗
- Who funds WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds FREE CLINIC OF SIMI VALLEY ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION FOR VENTURA ↗
- Who funds CONEJO FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds HELP OF OJAI INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR FAMILY HARMONY ↗
- Who funds GOLD COAST VETERANS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERFACE CHILDREN FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PDAP OF VENTURA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ROBLES HOSPITAL VOLUNTEERS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Ventura County Community FoundationCA24.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Ventura County Community Foundation · Swift Memorial Health Care Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Sherwood Country Club Charitable · Meadowlark Service League · California Physicians' Service Fdn · Dignity Health · The Annenberg Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation LIVINGSTON MEMORIAL FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 6.0× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 770563241 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Livingston Memorial Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Livingston Memorial Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines