Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lisette S Venier Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$77k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$42kHousing & Shelter$35kHealth$34kEducation$33kReligion$30kFood & Nutrition$28kAnimals$15kHuman Services$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$8,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$5,000
CENTERBOARD$5,000
HAWC$5,000
COMMONWEALTH SCHOOL$5,000
THE FOOD PROJECT$5,000
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$5,000
THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS$4,500
THE SALVATION ARMY$3,000
NATIVE LAND CONSERVANCY$3,000
FAMILY PROMISE$2,000
ROSIE'S PLACE$2,000
LIFEBRIDGE NORTHSHORE$2,000
MY BROTHER'S TABLE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PINE STREET INN: $2k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%LIFEBRIDGE NORTHSHORE: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NJ
VA
MD
AR
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$254k · 19 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
2

Total granted

$254k
$15k

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’24
EnvironmentHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesEducationHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS
    4× · 2020–2024 · $35k · revenue +29%
  • TC
    THE COMMONWEALTH SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +32%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    4× · 2020–2024 · $23k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • U
    UUCM
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • SP
    SMILE PROJECT
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
3
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
4
Natural Resources Trust of Easton

It is the mission of the natural resources trust of easton (nrt) to educate the public of significant natural and cultural resources and to acquire and preserve land of special character for the benefit of the public.

Environment
5
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
6
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
7
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
8
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
9
Maine Audubon Society

Maine Audubon works to conserve Maine's wildlife and habitat by engaging people of all ages in education, conservation, and action. We are helping the people of Maine become the nation's most informed and effective stewards of wildlife and…

Environment
10
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
11
The Norman Bird Sanctuary Trust

Our mission is to spark people's curiosity to explore, steward, and find peace and joy in nature. in service to this, norman bird sanctuary inspires, builds, and engages a community of stewards who preserve, protect, enjoy, and learn from…

Animals
12
Citizens Inn Inc

The organization's mission is to prevent and end hunger and homelessness by providing integrated services that promote long-term stability, health, and independence. (see schedule o for full description)

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centerboard Inc; the most unlike its peers is Broken Tail Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITARIAN CHURCH OF MARBLEHEAD: $20,000 · OtherUNITARIAN CHURCH OF MARBLEHEADHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $16,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYHEALING ABUSE WORKING FOR CHANGE: $10,000 · OtherHEALING ABUSE WORKING FOR CHANGEUUCM: $10,000 · OtherUUCMHAWC: $10,000 · OtherHAWCHEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $9,000 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONALCENTERBOARD INC: $8,000 · OtherLESLEY UNIVERSITY: $8,000 · OtherMY BROTHER'S TABLE INC: $8,000 · OtherHEART OF THE CATSKILLS ANIMAL SHELT: $8,000 · OtherLIFEBRIDGE: $6,000 · OtherNORTHEAST ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $6,000 · Other+3 more: $10,000 · Other+3 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $34,500 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTEES OF …NATIVE LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $3,000 · EnvironmentNATIVE LAND CONS…MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentTHE COMMONWEALTH SCHOOL INC: $25,000 · EducationTHE COMMO…Children's Hospital Corporation: $23,000 · HealthChildren'…The Food Project Inc: $20,000 · Food & NutritionFAMILY PROMISE INC: $8,000 · Housing & ShelterROSIE'S PLACE INC: $4,000 · Housing & ShelterPINE STREET INN INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE SALEM MISSION INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesBROKEN TAIL RESCUE INC: $1,000 · Animals
Other$154,000Environment$41,500Education$25,000Health$23,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Housing & Shelter$12,000Human Services$7,000Animals$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $34,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMONWEALTH SCHOOL INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $23,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Food Project Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCENTERBOARD INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLESLEY UNIVERSITY: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMY BROTHER'S TABLE INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SALEM MISSION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROKEN TAIL RESCUE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMONWEALTH SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds The Food Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTERBOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds LESLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MY BROTHER'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SALEM MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BROKEN TAIL RESCUE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lisette S Venier Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lisette S Venier Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Centerboard Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • The Salem Mission Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Family Promise Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Lesley University: 1% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lisette S Venier’s filings →

More from the funding graph