Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lisben Charitable Foundation Inc Co Lisa Sternlicht

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Philanthropy$42kArts & Culture$33kReligion$26kInternational$7kHuman Services$2kEducation$1kHealth$700Food & Nutrition$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
5
States reached
$151k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$6,250
JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHEASTERN N$6,000
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$3,000
CONGREGATION AGUDATH ACHIM$2,500
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM$1,500
STAND WITH US$1,000
HADASSAH$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
PAN-MASS CHALLENGE$500
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$300
Individual grant recipient$300
Individual grant recipient$250
15-LOVE$250
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$250
UNION COLLEGE HILLEL$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 17%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 17%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$126k · 16 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
8

Total granted

$126k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+24%

Still filing today

38%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $830 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalHealthEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $29k · revenue +52%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2k · revenue +24%
  • IE
    ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
    2× · 2023–2025 · $1k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • KF
    KONNER FAMILY CHARITABLE FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
  • HA
    HEBREW ACADEMY OF THE CAPITAL DISTR
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
6
Ny Police and Fire Widows' & Children's Benefit Fund Inc

Brief description of the organization's mission the purpose of the fund is to provide assistance to the families of new york city police officers and firefighters who have been killed in the line of duty. after the events of september 11,…

Human Services
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
11
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
12
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Israel Defense Forces. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHEASTERN N: $29,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHEASTERN NIndividual grant recipient: $25,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION AGUDATH ACHIM: $12,577 · OtherCONGREGATION AGUDATH ACHIMKONNER FAMILY CHARITABLE FUND: $12,000 · OtherKONNER FAMILY CHARITABLE FUNDHADASSAH: $6,000 · OtherHADASSAHBROOKLYN HEIGHTS SYNAGOGUE: $5,737 · OtherBROOKLYN HEIGHTS SYNAGOGUE+16 more: $6,635 · Other+16 moreSARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $29,250 · Arts & CultureSARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS C…AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $3,500 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD V…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $6,000 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $1,250 · InternationalWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,250 · Human ServicesSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,050 · EducationGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC: $250 · Food & Nutrition
Other$97,549Arts & Culture$32,750International$7,250Human Services$2,250Education$1,050Philanthropy$1,000Food & Nutrition$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $29,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY MISSION OF SCHENECTADY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTO LIFE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY MISSION OF SCHENECTADY ↗
  • Who funds TO LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lisben Charitable Foundation Inc Co Lisa Sternlicht funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lisben Charitable Foundation Inc Co Lisa Sternlicht. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lisben Charitable Foundation Inc Co Lisa Sternlicht’s filings →

More from the funding graph