Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lipton Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$313k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$126k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Arts & Culture$770kPhilanthropy$416kReligion$208kHealth$174kInternational$26kFood & Nutrition$7kAnimals$1kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $126k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $178k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART$125,530
GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION$52,892
MAGEN DAVID ADOM$25,800
TORAH LISHMA$25,000
THE SHUL OF BAL HARBOUR$20,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$19,800
JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$15,000
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL$10,000
JCC ROCK STEADY BOXING$10,000
EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE$3,600
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$2,500
MOBILE SCHOOL PANTRY$1,800
JCS KOSHER FOOD BANK$1,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITAL$360
PROJECT 24$198
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MICHAEL ANN RUSSELL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $118 → 9%JOSHUA'S HEART FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 13% of Lipton Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 85% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Lipton Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 11 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
16

Total granted

$1.2M
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+73%

Still filing today

27%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsReligionPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IO
    INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART MIAMI INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $768k · revenue +44%
  • SO
    SHUL OF BAL HARBOUR INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $149k
  • JR
    JCC ROCK STEADY BOXING
    6× · 2019–2024 · $62k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI HILLEL
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • MC
    MIAMI CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC FKA MIAMI YOUTH MUSEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +64%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami
2
Miami Jewish Health Systems Inc

Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…

Human Services
3
Pet Rescue Miami Inc
Animals
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
The Center for Jewish Life Miami Inc

The center for jewish life is a kehillah-an important hub for the entire central miami community. the center is a home-base for jewish communal life and living.

Religion
6
Miami Jewish Health Systems Foundation Inc

The organization's mission is to solicit and invest contributions for the benefit of and support of the activities of miami jewish health systems, inc. and related affiliates.

Health
7
Kaplan Family Foundation Inc

To support the greater miami jewish federation and other irc code section 501(c)(3) organizations. philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking programs.

Philanthropy
8
Gulf Coast Jewish Family and Community Services Inc

Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)

9
Ahavas Torah V'chesed
Philanthropy
10
Yotzer Ohr Inc

Our school is run on a system of mutual respect, for teachers, administration and students. in a warm and caring environment, full of creativity and multi-faceted approaches to education, we ignite a spark in each girl to love hashem and…

Education
11
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

12
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Michael-Ann Russell Jewish Community Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Catopia Cat Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART MIAMI INC — $768,149 · Arts & CultureINSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART MIAMI INC+1 more — $2,000 · Arts & CultureSHUL OF BAL HARBOUR INC — $148,985 · OtherSHUL OF BAL HARBOUR INCJCC ROCK STEADY BOXING — $61,562 · OtherJCC ROCK STEADY BOXINGMOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $50,000 · OtherMOUNT SINAI HOSPITALFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE — $44,646 · OtherFRIENDSHIP CIRCLEMIAMI JACKSON HOSPITAL GOLDEN ANGELS — $30,000 · OtherMIAMI JACKSON HOSPITAL GOLD…EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE — $15,400 · Other+17 more — $36,836 · Other+17 moreGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $371,055 · PhilanthropyGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDER…+1 more — $200 · PhilanthropyTORAH LISHMA INC — $26,800 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $25,800 · InternationalJACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $7,500 · HealthJOSHUAS HEART FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesMICHAEL-ANN RUSSELL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $118 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$770,149Other$387,429Philanthropy$371,255Religion$26,800International$25,800Health$22,500Human Services$1,118

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART MIAMI INC — $768,149 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $371,055 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTORAH LISHMA INC — $26,800 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $25,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC FKA MIAMI YOUTH MUSEUM — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF MIAMI ANIMALS FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOSHUAS HEART FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATOPIA CAT RESCUE INC — $200 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMICHAEL-ANN RUSSELL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $118 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART MIAMI INC
  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC
  • Who funds TORAH LISHMA INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
  • Who funds JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds MIAMI CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC FKA MIAMI YOUTH MUSEUM
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MIAMI ANIMALS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds JOSHUAS HEART FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC
  • Who funds CATOPIA CAT RESCUE INC
  • Who funds MICHAEL-ANN RUSSELL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lipton Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Jackson Health Foundation Inc1% of income from government
  • Miami Children's Museum Inc Fka Miami Youth Museum0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lipton Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lipton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph