Skip to content

· Public charity

Lipscomb University

We are a christ-centered community preparing learners for purposeful lives through rigorous academics and transformative experiences.

$45M
Granted FY2020
5
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Lipscomb University’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Community Foundation Of Middle Tennessee Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Lipscomb University named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $31k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’17
1
’19
5
’20
2
’21
1
’22
2
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$39kEducation$30kCivil Rights$25kCommunity Improvement$20kHealth$15kYouth Development$10kPhilanthropy$10kPublic Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2020 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $31,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $45,342,081 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $45,311,081 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k4 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$475M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NASHVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$10,000
BEST BUDDIES OF NASHVILLE$6,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$5,000
NASHVILLE REPERTORY THEATER INC$5,000
NASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $10k → 14%BEST BUDDIES INTERNATIONAL INC: $10k → 15%TUSKEGEE HUMAN & CIVIL RIGHTS MULTICULTURAL CENTER INC: $25k → 32%BEST BUDDIES OF NASHVILLE: $11k → 4%NASBA CENTER FOR THE PUBLIC TRUST: $5k → 14%BEST BUDDIES OF NASHVILLE: $7k → 4%THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%BEST BUDDIES OF NASHVILLE: $6k → 4%MIDDLE TENNESSEE COUNCILBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5k → 14%NASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%NASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%BAREFOOT REPUBLIC INC: $5k → 14%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%NASHVILLE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $5k → 14%NASHVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10k → 14%NASHVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$99k · 4 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$99k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+74%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23
EducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalPublic BenefitArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Best Buddies International Inc
    4× · 2017–2023 · $34k · revenue +81%
  • NA
    NASHVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +50%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $15k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • TH
    TUSKEGEE HUMAN & CIVIL RIGHTS MULTICULTURAL CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +280% · 25% of their budget
  • BR
    BAREFOOT REPUBLIC INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +74%
  • NC
    NASBA CENTER FOR THE PUBLIC TRUST
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Nashville Chamber Public Benefit Foundation

The nashville chamber public benefit foundation supports the work of the nashville area chamber of commerce through efforts to improve the quality of education, encourage public and private efforts around education, and to facilitate the…

—
2
National Institute for Excellence in Teaching

Building educator excellence to give all students the opportunity for success.

Education
3
Nashville Technology Council

Ntc mission is to advance the diverse technology ecosystem by connecting and promoting members, attracting, growing and retaining tech talent, and providing opportunities to reinvest in the greater nashville community.

Community Improvement
4
Tennessee State Collaborative On Reforming Education

The mission of the state collaborative on reforming education (score) is to catalyze transformative change in tennessee education so that all students can achieve success. score is an independent, nonprofit, and nonpartisan institution,…

Education
5
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
6
National Medal of Honor Center for Leadership

The national medal of honor center for leadership prepares individuals to lead with courage, integrity, and service by delivering immersive, values based leadership education rooted in the enduring principles of the medal of honor. through…

Philanthropy
7
Sister Cities of Nashville

To foster understanding among citizens of nashville and other cultures of the world through its cultural exchanges, cultural programs and community partnership. the mission of the organization is to promote peace through mutual respect,…

International
8
National Alliance of Concurrent Enrollment Partnerships Inc

Advancing a national community to foster equity in dual and concurrent enrollment through accreditation, advocacy, research, and professional development.

Education
9
Knowledgeworks Foundation

We help our partners in states and schools work together to align policy and practice, reimagining what education can do through personalized, competency-based learning - and what it must do to prepare students for a lifetime of learning.

Education
10
National Association of Charter School Authorizers

To promote the establishment and operation of quality charter schools through responsible oversight in the public interest. nacsa serves the education and resource needs of the full range of chartering authorities across the country, whose…

Education
11
Creative Minds International Public Charter School

The mission of the charter school is to cultivate within all of our students the mindset, skills, creativity, and commitment to equity essential in becoming globally aware and independently minded citizens.

Education
12
National Council for the Social Studies

Founded in 1921, ncss advocates and builds capacity for high-quality social studies by providing leadership, programs, and resources for educators across the country to ensure students are educated and inspired for lifelong inquiry and…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashville Public Education Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Tuskegee Human & Civil Rights Multicultural Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationNASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATIONTUSKEGEE HUMAN & CIVIL RIGHTS MULTICULTURAL CENTER INC: $25,000 · EducationTUSKEGEE HUMAN & CIVIL RIGHTS MULTICULTURA…MANNA PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · EducationMANNA PROJECT INTERNATIONALBest Buddies International Inc: $34,052 · InternationalBest Buddies Internation…NASHVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $20,000 · OtherNASHVILLE AREA…American Heart Association Inc: $15,000 · HealthAmerican H…THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyBAREFOOT REPUBLIC INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 560 MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentNASHVILLE REPERTORY THEATRE INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureNASBA CENTER FOR THE PUBLIC TRUST: $5,000 · Public Benefit
Education$60,000International$34,052Other$20,000Health$15,000Philanthropy$10,000Youth Development$10,000Arts & Culture$5,000Public Benefit$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $34,052 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTUSKEGEE HUMAN & CIVIL RIGHTS MULTICULTURAL CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetNASHVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE REPERTORY THEATRE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBAREFOOT REPUBLIC INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 560 MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNASBA CENTER FOR THE PUBLIC TRUST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Memorial Foundation IncTN15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Memorial Foundation Inc · Hca Healthcare Foundation · Dettwiller Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lipscomb University funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lipscomb University. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $67M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lipscomb University’s filings →

More from the funding graph