Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Lipscomb University

We are a christ-centered community preparing learners for purposeful lives through rigorous academics and transformative experiences.

$45M
Granted FY2020
5
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Lipscomb University’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Community Foundation Of Middle Tennessee Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Lipscomb University named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $31k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
17
1
19
5
20
2
21
1
22
2
23
0
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

International$39kEducation$30kCivil Rights$25kCommunity Improvement$20kHealth$15kYouth Development$10kPhilanthropy$10kPublic Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2020 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $31,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $45,342,081 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $45,311,081 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k4 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$475M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NASHVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$10,000
BEST BUDDIES OF NASHVILLE$6,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$5,000
NASHVILLE REPERTORY THEATER INC$5,000
NASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $10k → 14%BEST BUDDIES INTERNATIONAL INC: $10k → 15%TUSKEGEE HUMAN & CIVIL RIGHTS MULTICULTURAL CENTER INC: $25k → 32%BEST BUDDIES OF NASHVILLE: $11k → 4%NASBA CENTER FOR THE PUBLIC TRUST: $5k → 14%BEST BUDDIES OF NASHVILLE: $7k → 4%THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%BEST BUDDIES OF NASHVILLE: $6k → 4%MIDDLE TENNESSEE COUNCILBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5k → 14%NASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%NASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%BAREFOOT REPUBLIC INC: $5k → 14%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%NASHVILLE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $5k → 14%NASHVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10k → 14%NASHVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$99k · 4 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$99k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+72%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23
EducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalPublic BenefitArts & CultureHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Best Buddies International Inc
    4× · 2017–2023 · $34k · revenue +81%
  • NA
    NASHVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +50%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $15k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • TH
    TUSKEGEE HUMAN & CIVIL RIGHTS MULTICULTURAL CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +280% · 25% of their budget
  • BR
    BAREFOOT REPUBLIC INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +72%
  • NC
    NASBA CENTER FOR THE PUBLIC TRUST
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Nashville Chamber Public Benefit Foundation

The nashville chamber public benefit foundation supports the work of the nashville area chamber of commerce through efforts to improve the quality of education, encourage public and private efforts around education, and to facilitate the…

2
National Institute for Excellence in Teaching

Building educator excellence to give all students the opportunity for success.

Education
3
Nashville Technology Council

Ntc mission is to advance the diverse technology ecosystem by connecting and promoting members, attracting, growing and retaining tech talent, and providing opportunities to reinvest in the greater nashville community.

Community Improvement
4
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
5
National Association of Independent Schools Inc

As the largest association of independent schools, nais co-creates the future of education by uniting and empowering our community. we do this through thought leadership, research, creation and curation of resources, and direct…

6
Knowledgeworks Foundation

We help our partners in states and schools work together to align policy and practice, reimagining what education can do through personalized, competency-based learning - and what it must do to prepare students for a lifetime of learning.

Education
7
Center for the Future of Arizona

Bringing arizonans together to create a stronger and brighter future for our state.

Community Improvement
8
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
9
National Alliance of Concurrent Enrollment Partnerships Inc

Advancing a national community to foster equity in dual and concurrent enrollment through accreditation, advocacy, research, and professional development.

Education
10
Sister Cities of Nashville

To foster understanding among citizens of nashville and other cultures of the world through its cultural exchanges, cultural programs and community partnership. the mission of the organization is to promote peace through mutual respect,…

International
11
Minnesota Education Equity Partnership

To transform systems, structures and public narratives to advance race equity and excellence in education.

Housing & Shelter
12
Nashville Public Television Inc

Npt inspires, educates, and engages our community through excellence in public media.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashville Public Education Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Tuskegee Human & Civil Rights Multicultural Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $30,000 · EducationNASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATIONTUSKEGEE HUMAN & CIVIL RIGHTS MULTICULTURAL CENTER INC — $25,000 · EducationTUSKEGEE HUMAN & CIVIL RIGHTS MULTICULTURA…MANNA PROJECT INTERNATIONAL — $5,000 · EducationMANNA PROJECT INTERNATIONALBest Buddies International Inc — $34,052 · InternationalBest Buddies Internation…NASHVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $20,000 · OtherNASHVILLE AREA…American Heart Association Inc — $15,000 · HealthAmerican H…THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyBAREFOOT REPUBLIC INC — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 560 MIDDLE TENNESSEE — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentNASHVILLE REPERTORY THEATRE INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureNASBA CENTER FOR THE PUBLIC TRUST — $5,000 · Public Benefit
Education$60,000International$34,052Other$20,000Health$15,000Philanthropy$10,000Youth Development$10,000Arts & Culture$5,000Public Benefit$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBest Buddies International Inc — $34,052 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTUSKEGEE HUMAN & CIVIL RIGHTS MULTICULTURAL CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetNASHVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE REPERTORY THEATRE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBAREFOOT REPUBLIC INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 560 MIDDLE TENNESSEE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNASBA CENTER FOR THE PUBLIC TRUST — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Memorial Foundation IncTN15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Memorial Foundation Inc · Hca Healthcare Foundation · Dettwiller Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lipscomb University funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $67M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph