Skip to content

Tennessee · Public charity

Lipscomb University

We are a christ-centered community preparing learners for purposeful lives through rigorous academics and transformative experiences.

$45M
Granted FY2020
5
Itemized grants FY2020
5
Organizations funded FY2020
60%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Lipscomb University’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Community Foundation Of Middle Tennessee Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Lipscomb University named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $31k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’17
1
’19
5
’20
2
’21
1
’22
2
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Itemized, FY2020
$31k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2020
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2020
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 5
FY2017 to FY2020
States reached, FY2020
1
Total assets, FY2020
$475M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 60% of the organizations Lipscomb University funded were first-time grantees, receiving 65% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20
EducationHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20205$31k60%
FY20191$10k100%
FY20175$50kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$39kEducation$30kCivil Rights$25kCommunity Improvement$20kHealth$15kYouth Development$10kPhilanthropy$10kPublic Benefit$5kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Where it is load-bearing

Lipscomb University supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 9 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $34,052 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNashville Public Education Foundation: $30,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTuskegee Human & Civil Rights Multicultural Center Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetNashville Area Chamber of Commerce: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNashville Repertory Theatre Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBarefoot Republic Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBoy Scouts of America 560 Middle Tennessee: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNasba Center for the Public Trust: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Memorial Foundation IncTN15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Memorial Foundation Inc · Hca Healthcare Foundation · Dettwiller Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Lipscomb University with peer funders

About Lipscomb University

How much does Lipscomb University give?
Lipscomb University reported 5 itemized grants totaling $31,000, out of $45,342,081 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2020 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 5 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2020.
What does Lipscomb University fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are International (25%), Education (19%), Civil Rights (16%).
Who are Lipscomb University's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: Best Buddies International Inc ($34k), Nashville Public Education Foundation ($30k), Tuskegee Human & Civil Rights Multicultural Center Inc ($25k).
Does Lipscomb University fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 60% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Lipscomb University?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Memorial Foundation Inc, Hca Healthcare Foundation, Dettwiller Foundation.
Where is Lipscomb University based?
Lipscomb University is based in TN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $67M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lipscomb University’s filings →

More from the funding graph