Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lipman Brothers Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$29k
Granted FY2021
3
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Arts & Culture$34kEducation$15kReligion$6kPhilanthropy$5kRecreation & Sports$1k
02FY2021 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
$4,134
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Navy Seal Foundation$24,240
TN Holocaust Commission$4,134
Shelby Farms Park Conservancy$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES: $5k → 7%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY HILLEL: $2k → 16%MANHATTAN JEWISH EXPERIENCE: $1k → 17%LEZION B'RINA INSTITUTE: $5k → 20%TN Holocaust Commission: $4k → 14%MEMPHIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $5k → 17%CHABAD OF SEATTLE: $3k → 9%UNKNOWN CHILD FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%Navy Seal Foundation: $24k → 10%NER YISROEL YESHIVA: $500 → 11%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%MEMPHIS FRIENDS OF ISRAEL: $1k → 17%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%Shelby Farms Park Conservancy: $1k → 17%MARGOLIN HEBREW ACADEMY: $2k → 17%MARGOLIN HEBREW ACADEMY: $2k → 17%MARGOLIN HEBREW ACADEMY: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish National Fund

Jewish National Fund gives all generations of Jews a unique voice in building a prosperous future for the land of Israel and its people.

International
2
Jewish Federation of Nashville and

To serve as the central voluntary communal organization of the jewish community

Philanthropy
3
Museum of the Southern Jewish Experience

The museum of the southern jewish experience explores the many ways that jews in the american south influenced and were influenced by the distinct cultural heritage of their communities.

Arts & Culture
4
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
5
The Israel Forever Foundation
Arts & Culture
6
University of Judaism Foundation
—
7
The Contemporary Jewish Museum

Makes the diversity of jewish experience relevant through art & programs that challenge & inspire.

Arts & Culture
8
United Jewish Foundation

The united jewish foundation serves as custodian of the detroit jewish community's assets. the foundation is committed to preserving and growing the assets to meet the community's long term needs.

Philanthropy
9
Jnf Foundation
Philanthropy
10
The Genesis Foundation Inc

To educate jewish people about their heritage

—
11
Jewish Federation of Eastern

The federation collects contributions from the public and distributes them to various agencies, individuals and other non-profit organizations to benefit the jewish and local community. the federation provides direct services to seniors,…

—
12
Norwich University

Norwich's mission is to give our youth an education that shall be american in its character.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University Hillel Advisory; the most unlike its peers is Northeastern University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $24,240 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INCFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $4,500 · Arts & CultureFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INCUNKNOWN CHILD FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureMARGOLIN HEBREW ACADEMY-YESHIVA OF THE SOUTH: $6,000 · OtherMARGOLIN HEBREW ACADEMY-YESHIVA OF THE S…LEZION B'RINA INSTITUTE: $5,000 · OtherLEZION B'RINA INSTITUTETN Holocaust Commission: $4,134 · OtherTN Holocaust CommissionCHABAD OF SEATTLE: $2,600 · OtherCHABAD OF SEATTLENORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY HILLEL: $2,000 · OtherNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY HILLELMANHATTAN JEWISH EXPERIENCE SYNAGOGUE: $1,000 · Other+1 more: $500 · OtherMEMPHIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $4,500 · PhilanthropyNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $2,628 · EducationTHE MEMPHIS FRIENDS OF ISRAEL: $1,000 · EducationSHELBY FARMS PARK CONSERVANCY: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Arts & Culture$29,740Other$21,234Philanthropy$4,500Education$3,628Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $24,240 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEMPHIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $2,628 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEMPHIS FRIENDS OF ISRAEL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUNKNOWN CHILD FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSHELBY FARMS PARK CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lipman Brothers Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lipman Brothers Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lipman Brothers Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lipman Brothers Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lipman Brothers’ filings →

More from the funding graph