Skip to content

· Public charity

Lions International Shakopee

Civic/Social Service

$254k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$144kRecreation & Sports$143kHealth$31kFood & Nutrition$28kEducation$18kInternational$15kPublic Benefit$13kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $87,112, the rows itemized in this filing. The $253,767 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $166,655 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
$7,461
Median grant
1
States reached
$170k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Shakopee Lions Foundation$44,630
Humanity Alliance$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,221
CAP Agency$7,461
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Park Nicillet Foundation$5,500
Shakopee Crime Prevention$5,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CAP Agency: $7k → 5%CAP Agency: $5k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$340k · 9 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

$340k
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+68%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    SHAKOPEE LIONS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $144k
  • CO
    City of Shakopee
    3× · 2017–2021 · $90k
  • LI
    LIONS INTERNATIONAL SHAKOPEE
    4× · 2017–2022 · $24k · revenue -22%

Funded once

  • LC
    Lions Clubs International Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +32%
  • JT
    Jackson Township
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
  • AM
    ALLOS MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mn Fighting Lions

Raise funds for handicap people to participate in sports activities

Recreation & Sports
2
Utah Lions Foundation

Promote vision health and disease prevention

—
3
St Petersburg Lions Foundation Inc

Sight conservation

Education
4
Mille Lacs Smallmouth Alliance

The Mille Lacs Smallmouth Alliance is a charitable non-profit organization dedicated to rebuilding, preserving and maintaining Mille Lacs Lake as a world class trophy smallmouth bass fishery. Our work will include: educating fishermen,…

Human Services
5
St Louis Park Rotary Foundation

A member service organization operating within the principles of rotary and Rotary International

—
6
Lions Sight & Hearing Foundation of Nh
—
7
International Association of Lions Club Lititz Lions and Leos Club

Non-profit community service group.

—
8
Multiple District 5M International Association of Lions Inc

The organization is an administrative unit of lions club international, and services clubs in minnesota, manitoba, and northwestern ontario.

—
9
La Crosse Lions Charities Inc

Vision screening in local school. Provide eye exams and glasses for needy individuals. Support of organizations that help vision impaired, hearing impaired, disabled and needy individuals. Volunteer for events sponsored by community…

—
10
Minnesota Athletic Trainers Associa

Monitor state medical legislation and provide input to state legislators regarding issues affecting the role and practice of the athletic trainer

—
11
Coon Rapids Lions Foundation
Unclassified
12
International Association of Lions Clubs 65579 4L5

Helping those less fortunate

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lions Clubs International Foundation; the most unlike its peers is National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

City of Shakopee: $90,065 · OtherCity of ShakopeeLIONS INTERNATIONAL SHAKOPEE: $23,540 · OtherLIONS INTERNATIONAL SHAKOPEEIndividual grant recipient: $20,631 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJackson Township: $12,500 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC: $11,000 · OtherISD 720 - SHAKOPEE: $10,600 · OtherALLOS MINISTRIES: $10,000 · OtherRiver Valley Health: $10,000 · OtherMINNESOTA LIONS VISION FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · Other+9 more: $55,425 · Other+9 moreSHAKOPEE LIONS FOUNDATION: $143,830 · Community ImprovementSHAKOPEE LIONS FOUNDATIONThe Humanity Alliance: $15,680 · Community ImprovementThe Humanity AllianceLions Clubs International Foundation: $14,826 · PhilanthropySCOTT CARVER DAKOTA CAP AGENCY INC: $12,739 · Human ServicesNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $12,190 · HealthSHAKOPEE YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $7,428 · Youth Development
Other$252,761Community Improvement$159,510Philanthropy$14,826Human Services$12,739Health$12,190Youth Development$7,428

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHAKOPEE LIONS FOUNDATION: $143,830 over 4y, 22% of budgetLIONS INTERNATIONAL SHAKOPEE: $23,540 over 4y, 17% of budgetThe Humanity Alliance: $15,680 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLions Clubs International Foundation: $14,826 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCOTT CARVER DAKOTA CAP AGENCY INC: $12,739 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $12,190 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA LIONS VISION FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHAKOPEE YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $7,428 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetSOUTHERN VALLEY ALLIANCE: $6,164 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHAKOPEE LIONS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIONS INTERNATIONAL SHAKOPEE ↗
  • Who funds The Humanity Alliance ↗
  • Who funds Lions Clubs International Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SCOTT CARVER DAKOTA CAP AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA LIONS VISION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHAKOPEE YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN VALLEY ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lions International Shakopee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lions International Shakopee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lions International Shakopee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph