Skip to content
Linsone Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Linsone Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$836kPhilanthropy$55kEducation$15kReligion$12kHealth$7kInternational$6kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,076
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTCHESTER DAY SCHOOL$2,076
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $250 → 17%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $250 → 17%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $250 → 17%THE JCC IN MANHATTAN: $500 → 17%THE JCC IN MANHATTAN: $500 → 17%THE JCC IN MANHATTAN: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

10%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$97k · 16 repeat orgs$838k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
3

Total granted

$97k
$836k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+169%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’24
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $55k · revenue +46%
  • OI
    ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD
    3× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue +228%
  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    2× · 2020–2021 · $3k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • MA
    MORRIS & ANNA PROPP SONS FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $833k · revenue +169% · 76% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVOT BNAI AKIVA
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
5
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
6
Moskowitz Prize for Zionism Inc
—
7
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
8
Yad Laniyim
Philanthropy
9
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
10
University of Judaism Foundation
—
11
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
12
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Impactisrael Inc; the most unlike its peers is Morris & Anna Propp Sons Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MORRIS & ANNA PROPP SONS FUND INC: $832,891 · OtherMORRIS & ANNA PROPP SONS FUND INC+10 more: $32,076 · OtherUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $55,000 · PhilanthropyONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $3,000 · InternationalAMERICA-ISRAEL FRIENDSHIP LEAGUE INC: $1,500 · InternationalIMPACTISRAEL INC: $1,500 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $3,000 · EducationVISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK: $1,500 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 · HealthTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $750 · Human Services
Other$864,967Philanthropy$55,000International$6,000Arts & Culture$3,000Education$3,000Health$2,750Human Services$2,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMORRIS & ANNA PROPP SONS FUND INC: $832,891 over 1y, 76% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRELIGIOUS ZIONISTS OF AMERICA MIZRACHI HAPOEL HAMIZRACHI INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRIVKAH LAUFER BIKUR CHOLIM: $2,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $1,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA-ISRAEL FRIENDSHIP LEAGUE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACTISRAEL INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morris & Anna Propp S…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morris & Anna Propp Sons Fund IncFL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morris & Anna Propp Sons Fund Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Linsone Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Linsone Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Linsone Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Linsone Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Linsone’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home