Skip to content

· Private foundation

Linden David Nelson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$78kReligion$44kEducation$43kHealth$31kArts & Culture$30kCommunity Improvement$25kCivil Rights$23kRecreation & Sports$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$28k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE$8,000
THE SHUL OF BAR HARBOUR$4,574
NAACP$3,000
CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK$1,030
BAIS CHABAD TORAH CENTER OF WEST BLOOMFIELD$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THEA FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%ROCKET GIVING FUND: $10k → 21%BONEI OLAM: $360 → 20%THEA FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%BONEI OLAM: $360 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
IL
MI
NY
OH
CA
CO
AR
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 22% of Linden David Nelson Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Linden David Nelson Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 22% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$114k · 9 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
34

Total granted

$114k
$209k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+37%

Still filing today

44%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    TRINITY HEALTH CORPORATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +40%
  • COLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES
    2× · 2018–2019 · $20k · revenue +26%
  • BO
    Bonei Olam Inc
    2× · 2018–2020 · $720 · revenue +195%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue -51%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • AA
    ARTIST ADVOCACY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Artis Contemporary Israeli Art Fundinc

Artis is an independent nonprofit organization that supports contemporary artists from israel whose work addresses aesthetic, social and political questions to inspire reflection and debate. www.artis.art

Arts & Culture
3
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
4
American Academy of Dermatology Inc

To assure that dermatologists have access to the highest quality education, research and innovations in the field, and that patients and the public have access to the highest quality medical and surgical dermatologic care and to…

Health
5
American Academy of Dermatology Association Inc

To represent the interests of dermatologists and their patients. to influence and be a credible resource for public and private entities related to all policies and regulations that have the potential to affect the delivery of dermatologic…

Health
6
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
7
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
8
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
9
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
10
The Jewish Women's Archive Inc

The jewish women's archive documents jewish women's stories, elevates their voices, and inspires them to be agents of change.jwa is dedicated to expanding and transforming the historical narrative by restoring jewish women and gender…

Arts & Culture
11
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
12
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hadassah Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bonei Olam Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVATH BETH YEHUDAH: $29,000 · OtherYESHIVATH BETH YEHUDAHIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNAACP: $17,500 · OtherNAACPTHE BAS MUSEUM OF ART: $9,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $9,000 · OtherTHE SHUL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $9,000 · OtherBOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,500 · OtherEASTERN MARKET CORPORATION: $10,800 · OtherEASTERN MARKET CORPORATION+23 more: $46,249 · Other+23 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $75,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN…+1 more: $720 · InternationalCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES: $20,000 · EducationHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT: $1,800 · Education+1 more: $540 · EducationTRINITY HEALTH CORPORATION: $20,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,000 · HealthARTIST ADVOCACY FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DETROIT: $900 · Arts & CultureROCKET GIVING FUND: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHEA FOUNDATION: $4,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,200 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $720 · Human ServicesDETROIT CHILDREN'S FUND: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE HADASSAH FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 · Philanthropy
Other$170,049International$75,720Education$22,340Health$22,000Arts & Culture$18,900Human Services$16,420Philanthropy$11,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY HEALTH CORPORATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARTIST ADVOCACY FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetEASTERN MARKET CORPORATION: $10,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDETROIT CHILDREN'S FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROCKET GIVING FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHEA FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HADASSAH FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBORCULO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DETROIT: $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $720 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPELOTONIA: $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds ARTIST ADVOCACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN MARKET CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT CHILDREN'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds ROCKET GIVING FUND ↗
  • Who funds THEA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds THE HADASSAH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds BORCULO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward C and Linda Dresner Levy FoundationVA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward C and Linda Dresner Levy Foundation · William Davidson Foundation · Jk Farber Family Foundation · Grosfeld Foundation · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Gilbert Family Foundation · The Gilbert Family Foundation · Hudson-Webber Foundation · United Jewish Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · DTE Energy Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Linden David Nelson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Linden David Nelson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Linden David Nelson’s filings →

More from the funding graph