Skip to content

· Private foundation

Linda Levenson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$77k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Human Services$27kScience & Tech$20kInternational$19kReligion$12kFood & Nutrition$6kHealth$5kEnvironment$3k
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
$1,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$82k
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 95% of reported assets are held in Investments Apple.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$25,400
SANTA MARIA URBAN MINISTRY ADDRESS$15,250
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE$5,000
THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL$5,000
KQED$5,000
TEMPLE BETH SHALOM$5,000
PENINSULA FOOD$4,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$2,000
TEMPLE EMMANUEL$1,950
MIDDLE EASTERN ENTREPENEUR AND TECH (MEET INTERNATIONAL INC)$1,500
ONE STEP CLOSER$1,200
SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY$1,000
MILAAN FOUNDATION$1,000
PASADENA HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TEMPLE EMMANUEL: $2k → 8%MIDDLE EASTERN ENTREPENEUR AND TECH (MEET INTERNATIONAL INC): $2k → 16%OSHMANN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $250 → 8%TEMPLE BETH SHALOM: $5k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 10%PASADENA HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 14%LOUD FOR TOMORROW: $500 → 18%COMMUNITY WATER CENTER: $3k → 18%LEARNING THROUGH EXPANDED ARTS PROGRAM: $300 → 17%ONE STEP CLOSER: $1k → 16%INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CENTER: $1k → 23%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE: $6k → 9%SHADHIKA: $6k → 12%MILAAN FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 14%NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS: $5k → 7%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $250 → 8%TEMPLE EMMANUEL: $2k → 8%SANTA MARIA URBAN MINISTRY ADDRESS: $15k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 10%FRIENDS OF JEWISH RENEWAL IN POLAND: $7k → 14%AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY: $15k → 17%ONE STEP CLOSER: $1k → 16%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE: $5k → 9%SANTA MARIA URBAN MINISTRY ADDRESS: $10k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $6k → 10%AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY: $5k → 17%SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $1k → 8%KQED: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$104k · 6 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$104k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+81%

Still filing today

17%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
InternationalEnvironmentHealthArts & CultureAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES
    3× · 2023–2025 · $51k
  • SM
    SANTA MARIA URBAN MINISTRY ADDRESS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $11k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF JEWISH RENEWAL IN POLAND
    one grant, 2024 · $7k · revenue 0%
  • SP
    Shadhika Project
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue -82%
  • NN
    NAMI Nationalgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +181%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
2
Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle

The federation leads a strong jewish puget sound by serving as a community voice, strengthening connections to israel and world jewry, and making investments in jewish life, for today and the next generation.

Philanthropy
3
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
4
The Conversationalist
—
5
The Global Hunger Project

The hunger project is working to create a world without hunger through women-centered, holistic development strategies that address the root causes of hunger and poverty. in 2025, it reached nearly 12.7 million people in over 10,000…

International
6
Jewish Federation of Greater Portland

To assure the building and strengthening of the jewish community locally, nationally, overseas and in israel, in accordance with jewish values.

Philanthropy
7
Foundation for Jewish Camp Inc

Jewish summer camp is the enduring and irreplaceable connection and community that strengthens jewish identity, develops jewish leadership, and ensures a jewish future. (continued on schedule o)

Youth Development
8
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
9
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
10
New Israel Fund

The new israel fund (nif) helps israel live up to its founders' vision of a society that ensures complete equality to all its inhabitants. our aim is to advance liberal democracy, including freedom of speech and minority rights, and to…

International
11
Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc

The jewish federation of greater atlanta cares for, connects and strengthens our jewish community throughout greater atlanta, israel and the world.

Philanthropy
12
Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia

The jewish federation of greater philadelphia mobilizes financial and volunteer resources to create a bright future for jewish people everywhere. the jewish federation cares for those in need, combats antisemitism and global crises, and…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oshman Family Jewish Community Center; the most unlike its peers is Los Gatos Community Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
5/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $51,400 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICESSANTA MARIA URBAN MINISTRY ADDRESS: $24,950 · OtherSANTA MARIA URBAN MINISTRY ADDRESSPENINSULA FOOD: $10,300 · OtherPENINSULA FOODShadhika Project: $6,000 · OtherShadhika ProjectTEMPLE BETH SHALOM: $5,000 · OtherTEMPLE EMMANUEL: $3,798 · Other+9 more: $7,500 · Other+9 moreAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $20,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $11,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIV…FRIENDS OF JEWISH RENEWAL IN POLAND: $7,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF JEWISH RENEWAL IN P…THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTAR…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,000 · InternationalKQED INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureNAMI National: $5,000 · HealthCommunity Water Center: $2,500 · EnvironmentPASADENA HUMANE: $1,000 · AnimalsMilaan Foundation: $1,000 · Education
Other$108,948International$45,000Arts & Culture$5,000Health$5,000Environment$2,500Animals$1,000Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF JEWISH RENEWAL IN POLAND: $7,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetShadhika Project: $6,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetKQED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Water Center: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMilaan Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Linda Levenson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Linda Levenson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Linda Levenson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Linda Levenson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Linda Levenson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph