Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Linda Levenson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232024.

Human Services$27kScience & Tech$20kInternational$19kReligion$12kFood & Nutrition$6kHealth$5kEnvironment$3k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$6,300
Median grant
7
States reached
$135k
Total assets

Anchored by a single position — about 95% of reported assets are held in Investments Apple.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$20,000
AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY$15,000
SANTA MARIA URBAN MINISTRY ADDRESS$9,700
FRIENDS OF JEWISH RENEWAL IN POLAND$7,000
PENINSULA FOOD$6,300
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE$6,000
SHADHIKA$6,000
NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS$5,000
TEMPLE EMMANUEL$1,848
ONE STEP CLOSER$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 43% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%TEMPLE EMMANUEL: $2k → 8%SANTA MARIA URBAN MINISTRY ADDRESS: $10k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 10%FRIENDS OF JEWISH RENEWAL IN POLAND: $7k → 14%COMMUNITY WATER CENTER: $3k → 18%AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY: $15k → 17%ONE STEP CLOSER: $1k → 16%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE: $6k → 9%SHADHIKA: $6k → 12%NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS: $5k → 7%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $6k → 10%AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
2
Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle

The federation leads a strong jewish puget sound by serving as a community voice, strengthening connections to israel and world jewry, and making investments in jewish life, for today and the next generation.

Philanthropy
3
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
4
The Conversationalist
5
The Global Hunger Project

The hunger project is working to create a world without hunger through women-centered, holistic development strategies that address the root causes of hunger and poverty. in 2025, it reached nearly 12.7 million people in over 10,000…

International
6
Jewish Federation of Greater Portland

To assure the building and strengthening of the jewish community locally, nationally, overseas and in israel, in accordance with jewish values.

Philanthropy
7
Foundation for Jewish Camp Inc

Jewish summer camp is the enduring and irreplaceable connection and community that strengthens jewish identity, develops jewish leadership, and ensures a jewish future. (continued on schedule o)

Youth Development
8
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
9
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
10
New Israel Fund

The new israel fund (nif) helps israel live up to its founders' vision of a society that ensures complete equality to all its inhabitants. our aim is to advance liberal democracy, including freedom of speech and minority rights, and to…

International
11
Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc

The jewish federation of greater atlanta cares for, connects and strengthens our jewish community throughout greater atlanta, israel and the world.

Philanthropy
12
Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia

The jewish federation of greater philadelphia mobilizes financial and volunteer resources to create a bright future for jewish people everywhere. the jewish federation cares for those in need, combats antisemitism and global crises, and…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oshman Family Jewish Community Center and the most unlike its peers is Los Gatos Community Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $26,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICESSANTA MARIA URBAN MINISTRY ADDRESS — $9,700 · OtherSANTA MARIA URBAN MINISTRY ADDRESSPENINSULA FOOD — $6,300 · OtherPENINSULA FOODShadhika Project — $6,000 · OtherShadhika ProjectTEMPLE EMMANUEL — $1,848 · Other+1 more — $1,000 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $20,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INS…FRIENDS OF JEWISH RENEWAL IN POLAND — $7,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF JEWISH RENEWAL IN POLANDAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION — $6,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE…NAMI National — $5,000 · HealthCommunity Water Center — $2,500 · Environment
Other$50,848International$33,000Health$5,000Environment$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF JEWISH RENEWAL IN POLAND — $7,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetShadhika Project — $6,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNAMI National — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Water Center — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Linda Levenson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Linda Levenson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Linda Levenson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph