Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Lincoln Hills Cares Foundation

The LINCOLN HILLS CARES FOUNDATION provides philanthropic support to develop the next generation of leaders through outdoor and environmental education, cultural history exploration, and workforce advancement.

$939k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$726k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Youth Development$6.1MArts & Culture$934kHuman Services$305kEnvironment$255kEducation$30kRecreation & Sports$16kCommunity Improvement$15k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
  • $250k+1 grant · $726k
$200,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LINCOLN HILLS CARES$726,083
TEENS INC$200,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF COLORADO$12,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $305k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%RIVER DEEP FOUNDATION: $305k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.9M · 7 repeat orgs$758k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
9

Total granted

$6.9M
$758k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+38%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    TEENS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +65%
  • LH
    LINCOLN HILLS CARES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +344% · 98% of their budget
  • CM
    Colorado Museum of Natural History
    5× · 2017–2021 · $934k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • RD
    RIVER DEEP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $305k · revenue -89% · 29% of their budget
  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $202k · revenue +40%
  • NS
    NEXUS SUMMER PROGRAM
    one grant, 2019 · $116k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rocky Mountain Youth Corps

Rocky mountain youth corps engages young people in the outdoors, inspiring them to use their strengths and potential to lead healthy, productive lives. we teach responsibility for self, community, and environment through teamwork, service,…

Youth Development
2
Colorado Wellness Center for Girls
3
Girl Scouts of Colorado

Girl scouts of colorado prepares girls and adults to create unique leadership paths, ignite change, and share a worldwide sisterhood through traditions and new experiences. girl scouts builds girls of courage, confidence, and character,…

Youth Development
4
Colorado Health Institute
Health
5
Boys & Girls Club of Northwest Colo

The mission of the clubs is to enable and inspire the youth of our area to reach their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens. the clubs offers core programs designed to engage youth with peers and caring adults to…

Youth Development
6
Stronger Faster Boulder Co
Recreation & Sports
7
Denver Youth Program

Youth counseling and mentoring.

Youth Development
8
Denver Police Activities League Inc

The denver police activities league's (pal) mission is to create strong communities by providing under-resourced children with opportunities, exposure, and experiences with the intent of changing young people's lives in a positive way.

Youth Development
9
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
10
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

11
Colorado Dream Foundation

We partner with youth and their families as they successfully navigate school, college, and career by providing a holistic academic, social, and emotional program from elementary school through college, along with post-secondary…

12
Girls Incorporated of Metro Denver

To inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teens Inc and the most unlike its peers is Colorado Mountain Bike Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LINCOLN HILLS CARES — $2,345,583 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN HILLS CARESColorado Museum of Natural History — $933,822 · Arts & CultureColorado Museum of Natural HistoryTEENS INC — $2,858,063 · Youth DevelopmentTEENS INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN COLORADO INC — $382,890 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN COLORADO INC+1 more — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCITYWILD — $255,201 · OtherCITYWILDBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC — $201,714 · OtherBOYS AND G…NEXUS SUMMER PROGRAM — $115,816 · OtherNEXUS SUMM…Boys & Girls Club of Colorado — $75,000 · OtherBoys & Gir…IEG INC — $33,473 · Other+1 more — $5,000 · OtherRIVER DEEP FOUNDATION — $304,745 · Human ServicesHEART AND HAND CENTER — $75,000 · Crime & LegalUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $24,831 · EducationDENVER PUBLIC LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationColorado Mountain Bike Association — $16,000 · Recreation & Sports
Arts & Culture$3,279,405Youth Development$3,250,953Other$686,204Human Services$304,745Crime & Legal$75,000Education$29,831Recreation & Sports$16,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTEENS INC — $2,858,063 over 8y, 12% of budgetLINCOLN HILLS CARES — $2,345,583 over 9y, 98% of budgetColorado Museum of Natural History — $933,822 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN COLORADO INC — $382,890 over 4y, 26% of budgetRIVER DEEP FOUNDATION — $304,745 over 1y, 29% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC — $201,714 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHEART AND HAND CENTER — $75,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetIEG INC — $33,473 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $24,831 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Mountain Bike Association — $16,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER PUBLIC LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationCO14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lincoln Hills Cares Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lincoln Hills Cares Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lincoln Hills Cares Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph