Skip to content

· Community foundation

Lincoln County Foundation

The LINCOLN COUNTY FOUNDATION is an agency established to receive, administer and disburse funds and other property to assist the people of lincoln county, oregon; particularly the young people through grants and scholarships.

$942k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$172kArts & Culture$89kHuman Services$81kEducation$64kYouth Development$60kCrime & Legal$40kCommunity Improvement$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $231,647, the rows itemized in this filing. The $942,153 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $710,506 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $180k
$25,474
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$130,000
LINCOLN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$50,000
OREGON COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE$25,474
SEASHORE FAMILY LITERACY$19,952
OLALLA CENTER$6,221
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANGELS ANONYMOUS: $30k → 16%ANGELS ANONYMOUS: $10k → 16%ANGELS ANONYMOUS: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$239k · 7 repeat orgs$419k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
12

Total granted

$239k
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-3%

Still filing today

14%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $232k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • O
    OTHER
    2× · 2018–2020 · $63k
  • AA
    ANGELS ANONYMOUS INC
    3× · 2018–2023 · $48k · revenue +49%
  • LC
    LINCOLN CITY KIWANIS
    6× · 2017–2022 · $48k

Funded once

  • LC
    LC CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
  • O
    OTHERS
    one grant, 2017 · $29k
  • LINCOLN CITY CULTURAL CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon City Rotary Club Foundation

Assist education of youth and help children and communities internationally

Community Improvement
2
Albina Rotary Club Foundation

Be a force for improvement in inner north-northeast portland primiarily for children

—
3
Oregon Rotary Club

Support community organizations

—
4
Rotary Club of Vancouver Sunrise Foundation

The organization's mission is to enable rotarians to advance world understanding, goodwill, and peace through the improvement of health, education, and alleviation of poverty, both locally and worldwide.

Education
5
Rotary Club of Eugene Oregon

Uncompensated service to others in our community, our nation, and the world.

—
6
The Lighthouse School the Lighthouse School

The school provides youth activities and education for students within the coos bay, oregon, school district. the school operates a public school that educates students in a waldorf style program.

Education
7
Portland Rotary Charitable Trust

The portland rotary charitable trust is the entity by which the rotary club of portland carries out its philanthropic activities in both the local and world communities servicing primarily the needs of youth.

Community Improvement
8
Lane Community College Education Association

Lane Community College Education Association is the union that represents 200 full-time and 375 part-time faculty members at Lane Community College in Eugene, Oregon. LCCEA is an affiliated unit of the Oregon Education Association (OEA)…

—
9
Coquille Rotary Foundation Inc
Community Improvement
10
Wallowa Valley Arts Council

To promote the arts in wallowa county, oregon.

—
11
Lincoln County Economic Development Corporation

To deliver economic development services to facilitate creation, growth and retention of lincoln county businesses.

—
12
Eugene Rowing Club

Eugene Rowing Club strives to build a team-oriented program. Our student athletesdevelop personal character, time management skills, an ethic of cooperation, and physical fitness with a team culture of crew and rowing. Athletes learn to…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lincoln City Cultural Center; the most unlike its peers is Olalla Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $130,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOTHER: $63,391 · OtherOTHERLINCOLN CITY KIWANIS: $47,960 · OtherLINCOLN CITY KIWANISLC CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $40,000 · OtherLC CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTEROTHERS: $29,067 · OtherOTHERSIZAAK WALTON LEAGUE WALDPORT ALSEA: $27,053 · OtherIZAAK WALTON LEAGUE WALDPORT ALSEAIndividual grant recipient: $18,973 · OtherLincoln County School District: $18,700 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $18,500 · OtherLINCOLN CITY ROTARY PROJECTS FUND: $16,284 · Other+8 more: $78,311 · Other+8 moreLINCOLN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $50,000 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN COUN…LINCOLN CITY CULTURAL CENTER: $20,175 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN CITY…ANGELS ANONYMOUS INC: $48,363 · Human ServicesOREGON COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25,474 · EducationSEASHORE FAMILY LITERACY CENTER: $19,952 · EducationROTARY DISTRICT 5110 YOUTH EXCHANGE: $6,300 · Youth Development
Other$488,239Arts & Culture$70,175Human Services$48,363Education$45,426Youth Development$6,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLINCOLN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $50,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetANGELS ANONYMOUS INC: $48,363 over 3y, 20% of budgetOREGON COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25,474 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetLINCOLN CITY CULTURAL CENTER: $20,175 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $18,500 over 1y, 27% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LINCOLN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS ANONYMOUS INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN CITY CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SEASHORE FAMILY LITERACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY DISTRICT 5110 YOUTH EXCHANGE ↗
  • Who funds OLALLA CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR18.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · Braemar Charitable Trust · The Ford Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lincoln County Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lincoln County Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2022
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 73%
  • Lincoln City Cultural Center: 73% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lincoln County Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lincoln County Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $698k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lincoln County’s filings →

More from the funding graph