Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Lincoln County Foundation

The LINCOLN COUNTY FOUNDATION is an agency established to receive, administer and disburse funds and other property to assist the people of lincoln county, oregon; particularly the young people through grants and scholarships.

$942k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$172kArts & Culture$89kHuman Services$81kEducation$64kYouth Development$60kCrime & Legal$40kCommunity Improvement$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $231,647 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $942,153 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $710,506 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $180k
$25,474
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$130,000
LINCOLN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$50,000
OREGON COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE$25,474
SEASHORE FAMILY LITERACY$19,952
OLALLA CENTER$6,221
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANGELS ANONYMOUS: $30k → 16%ANGELS ANONYMOUS: $10k → 16%ANGELS ANONYMOUS: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$239k · 7 repeat orgs$419k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
12

Total granted

$239k
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-3%

Still filing today

14%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $232k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • O
    OTHER
    2× · 2018–2020 · $63k
  • AA
    ANGELS ANONYMOUS INC
    3× · 2018–2023 · $48k · revenue +49%
  • LC
    LINCOLN CITY KIWANIS
    6× · 2017–2022 · $48k

Funded once

  • LC
    LC CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
  • O
    OTHERS
    one grant, 2017 · $29k
  • LINCOLN CITY CULTURAL CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon City Rotary Club Foundation

Assist education of youth and help children and communities internationally

Community Improvement
2
Albina Rotary Club Foundation

Be a force for improvement in inner north-northeast portland primiarily for children

3
Oregon Rotary Club

Support community organizations

4
Rotary Club of Vancouver Sunrise Foundation

The organization's mission is to enable rotarians to advance world understanding, goodwill, and peace through the improvement of health, education, and alleviation of poverty, both locally and worldwide.

Education
5
Rotary Club of Eugene Oregon

Uncompensated service to others in our community, our nation, and the world.

6
The Lighthouse School the Lighthouse School

The school provides youth activities and education for students within the coos bay, oregon, school district. the school operates a public school that educates students in a waldorf style program.

Education
7
Portland Rotary Charitable Trust

The portland rotary charitable trust is the entity by which the rotary club of portland carries out its philanthropic activities in both the local and world communities servicing primarily the needs of youth.

Community Improvement
8
Lane Community College Education Association

Lane Community College Education Association is the union that represents 200 full-time and 375 part-time faculty members at Lane Community College in Eugene, Oregon. LCCEA is an affiliated unit of the Oregon Education Association (OEA)…

9
Wallowa Valley Arts Council

To promote the arts in wallowa county, oregon.

10
Coquille Rotary Foundation Inc
Community Improvement
11
Eugene Rowing Club

Eugene Rowing Club strives to build a team-oriented program. Our student athletesdevelop personal character, time management skills, an ethic of cooperation, and physical fitness with a team culture of crew and rowing. Athletes learn to…

Recreation & Sports
12
Lincoln County Economic Development Corporation

To deliver economic development services to facilitate creation, growth and retention of lincoln county businesses.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lincoln City Cultural Center and the most unlike its peers is Olalla Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $130,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOTHER — $63,391 · OtherOTHERLINCOLN CITY KIWANIS — $47,960 · OtherLINCOLN CITY KIWANISLC CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $40,000 · OtherLC CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTEROTHERS — $29,067 · OtherOTHERSIZAAK WALTON LEAGUE WALDPORT ALSEA — $27,053 · OtherIZAAK WALTON LEAGUE WALDPORT ALSEAIndividual grant recipient — $18,973 · OtherLincoln County School District — $18,700 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $18,500 · OtherLINCOLN CITY ROTARY PROJECTS FUND — $16,284 · Other+8 more — $78,311 · Other+8 moreLINCOLN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $50,000 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN COUN…LINCOLN CITY CULTURAL CENTER — $20,175 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN CITY…ANGELS ANONYMOUS INC — $48,363 · Human ServicesOREGON COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $25,474 · EducationSEASHORE FAMILY LITERACY CENTER — $19,952 · EducationROTARY DISTRICT 5110 YOUTH EXCHANGE — $6,300 · Youth Development
Other$488,239Arts & Culture$70,175Human Services$48,363Education$45,426Youth Development$6,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLINCOLN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $50,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetANGELS ANONYMOUS INC — $48,363 over 3y, 20% of budgetOREGON COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $25,474 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetLINCOLN CITY CULTURAL CENTER — $20,175 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $18,500 over 1y, 27% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LINCOLN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds ANGELS ANONYMOUS INC
  • Who funds OREGON COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LINCOLN CITY CULTURAL CENTER
  • Who funds SEASHORE FAMILY LITERACY CENTER
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds ROTARY DISTRICT 5110 YOUTH EXCHANGE
  • Who funds OLALLA CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR18.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · Braemar Charitable Trust · The Ford Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lincoln County Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2022
202122232425
no gov · 50%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 73%
  • Lincoln City Cultural Center73% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lincoln County Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lincoln County Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $698k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph