Skip to content

Illinois · Private foundation

Lillian R Coleman Xxxxx2007

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$139k
Granted FY2026(still arriving)
70
Grants FY2026
77
Organizations funded FY2025
47%
First-time grantees FY2025
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2026
$2,000
Largest grant, FY2026
$2,800
Organizations funded a year
77 to 107
FY2019 to FY2025
States reached, FY2026
6
Total assets, FY2026
$2.3M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2025, 47% of the organizations Lillian R Coleman Xxxxx2007 funded were first-time grantees, receiving 46% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2026still arriving70$139k41%
FY202577$146k47%
FY202488$146k34%
FY2023107$146k41%
FY202298$128k56%
FY202183$120k47%
FY202089$128k54%
FY201997$129k100%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2026.

Education$1.2MEmployment$1kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
CA
UT
KY
OK
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2026, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Indiana University School of Medicine$20,8001n/a
Trustees of Purdue University$12,8001n/a
Marian University$9,00010%
Trine University$4,10010%
University of Indianapolis$3,84410%
Indiana Wesleyan University$1,60010%
Butler University$1,50010%
Anderson University Inc$1,40010%
Olivet Nazarene University$1,40010%
Manchester University Inc$1,00010%
Show all 13 grantees
All grantees of Lillian R Coleman Xxxxx2007 by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Indiana University School of Medicine$20,8001n/a
Trustees of Purdue University$12,8001n/a
Marian University$9,00010%
Trine University$4,10010%
University of Indianapolis$3,84410%
Indiana Wesleyan University$1,60010%
Butler University$1,50010%
Anderson University Inc$1,40010%
Olivet Nazarene University$1,40010%
Manchester University Inc$1,00010%
Hobart Institute of Welding Technology$1,00010%
Dominican University$1,00010%
University of Evansville$1,00010%

Plus 389 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.1M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Lillian R Coleman Xxxxx2007 supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarian University: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrine University: $4,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Indianapolis: $3,844 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana Wesleyan University: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetButler University: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnderson University Inc: $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOlivet Nazarene University: $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetManchester University Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHobart Institute of Welding Technology: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDominican University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Evansville: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Lillian R Coleman Xxxxx2007 with peer funders

About Lillian R Coleman Xxxxx2007

How much does Lillian R Coleman Xxxxx2007 give?
Lillian R Coleman Xxxxx2007 reported 70 grants totaling $138,808 in its FY2026 IRS filing. It funded between 77 and 107 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2025.
What does Lillian R Coleman Xxxxx2007 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2026, its largest causes are Education (98%), Employment (0%).
Who are Lillian R Coleman Xxxxx2007's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2026: Indiana University School of Medicine ($21k), Trustees of Purdue University ($13k), Marian University ($9k).
Does Lillian R Coleman Xxxxx2007 fund new organizations?
In FY2025, 47% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Lillian R Coleman Xxxxx2007 accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Lillian R Coleman Xxxxx2007?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include American Online Giving Foundation Inc.
Where is Lillian R Coleman Xxxxx2007 based?
Lillian R Coleman Xxxxx2007 is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 402 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lillian R Coleman Xxxxx2007’s filings →

More from the funding graph