Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lila a Lilly Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$132kRecreation & Sports$118kCommunity Improvement$72kYouth Development$36kHuman Services$27kReligion$27kInternational$23kArts & Culture$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$553k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Shu Ren of Portland Inc$20,000
Gary Sinise Foundation$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Grover Cleveland High School$5,000
Community Music Center$5,000
Gary Sinise Foundation$5,000
Portland Public Schools$3,000
Grover Cleveland High School$3,000
Grover Cleveland High School$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
OR
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
AZ
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 94% of Lila a Lilly Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Lila a Lilly Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$438k · 11 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
12

Total granted

$438k
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+17%

Still filing today

36%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GARY SINISE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +39%
  • HE
    Hartbeat Ensemble Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $9k · revenue +44%
  • PU
    PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2021 · $7k · revenue +637%

Funded once

  • LP
    La Plata County 4H Exchange Trip
    one grant, 2024 · $18k
  • LP
    LA PLATA CO 4H EXHANGE TRIP FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $18k
  • LP
    LA PLATA CO 4H EXCHANGE TRIP FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pacific Northwest Music Project
Arts & Culture
2
Jewish Federation of Greater Portland

To assure the building and strengthening of the jewish community locally, nationally, overseas and in israel, in accordance with jewish values.

Philanthropy
3
The Oregon Community Foundation Trust

The oregon community foundation trust is a supporting organization of the oregon community foundation (ocf). the trust makes grants that further the mission of ocf which is to improve the lives of all oregonians through the power of…

Philanthropy
4
Rainmaker Craft Initiative
Arts & Culture
5
All Classical Public Media Inc

To advance knowledge of and appreciation for classical music; to build and sustain culturally vibrant communities around the arts; and to reflect the spirit of the pacific northwest with innovative and high-quality programs.

Arts & Culture
6
Arx Music Association

Arx Duos mission is to inspire the creation of new music through equal collaboration with artists, highest quality presentation from the stage, and authentic engagement with audiences and communities everywhere.

Arts & Culture
7
Classical Uprising

Enlivening, strengthening, and connecting communities by creating immersive classical music experiences for everyone

Arts & Culture
8
MusicOregon

MusicOregon supports Oregons independent music creators and related professionals through artistic, cultural, educational, and public interest programs. We are committed to empowering creative musical excellence, promoting professional…

Arts & Culture
9
Cappella Romana

Musical performances for the public.

Unclassified
10
The Esoterics

The Esoterics is a Seattle-based vocal ensemble, dedicated to performing and perpetuating contemporary choral music from around the world.

Arts & Culture
11
Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle

The federation leads a strong jewish puget sound by serving as a community voice, strengthening connections to israel and world jewry, and making investments in jewish life, for today and the next generation.

Philanthropy
12
Palaver Strings Inc

Palaver strings is a grammy-nominated, musician-led string ensemble and nonprofit organization based in portland, me. our mission is to strengthen and inspire community through music. in our musician-led model, palaver's musicians share…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oregon Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Shu Ren of Portland Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEVELAND HIGH SCHOOL BASEBALL: $100,000 · OtherCLEVELAND HIGH SCHOOL BASEBALLIndividual grant recipient: $96,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLA PLATA CO 4H: $72,000 · OtherLA PLATA CO 4HCLEVELAND HIGH SCHOOL PTA: $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherLa Plata County 4H Exchange Trip: $18,000 · OtherLA PLATA CO 4H EXHANGE TRIP FUND: $18,000 · OtherLA PLATA CO 4H EXCHANGE TRIP FUND: $18,000 · OtherLA PLATA CO 4H EXCHANGE TRIP: $18,000 · Other+11 more: $75,500 · Other+11 moreSHU REN OF PORTLAND INC: $67,000 · EducationSHU REN OF POR…PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $7,000 · EducationPRAGER UNIVERS…GARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyHartbeat Ensemble Inc: $9,000 · Arts & CultureCommunity Music Center: $5,000 · Arts & CultureClackamas Service Center: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$456,500Education$74,000Philanthropy$25,000Arts & Culture$14,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHU REN OF PORTLAND INC: $67,000 over 6y, 71% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHartbeat Ensemble Inc: $9,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetClackamas Service Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Music Center: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHU REN OF PORTLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Hartbeat Ensemble Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Clackamas Service Center ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Community Music Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lila a Lilly Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lila a Lilly Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Clackamas Service Center: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lila a Lilly’s filings →

More from the funding graph