Skip to content

· Public charity

Ligue Henri IV

Maintain a fraternal understanding between members French or French descendants; and help them morally by maintaining a sense of community with cultural events.

$137k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$135kEducation$125kHealth$40kHousing & Shelter$30kHuman Services$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kInternational$15k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $105,234, the rows itemized in this filing. The $136,734 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $31,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Alliance Francaise$50,234
Notre Dame des Victoires$25,000
French-American Foundation for Medical Research$10,000
SF Basque Folkloric Group$5,000
Little Sisters of the Poor$5,000
Santa Rosa French American Charter School$5,000
St Anthonys Foundation$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%American Red Cross: $5k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$380k · 12 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
0

Total granted

$380k
$0

Still filing today

58%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthInternationalHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FA
    FRENCH AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +47% · 35% of their budget
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $15k · revenue +20%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2021–2023 · $15k · revenue +27%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Alliance Francaise Silicon Valley

    AF Silicon Valley is a non-profit organization and the official center of the French language and culture in Silicon Valley. Its mission is to promote and enhance knowledge and appreciation of the French culture.

    Arts & Culture
    2
    Alliance Francaise de Berkeley

    The Alliance Francaise de Berkeley (AFB) is organized to encourage and further the knowledge of the French language and Francophone cultures, and to foster friendly relations between American and French-speaking people.

    Arts & Culture
    3
    American Friends of the City of Paris Museum of Modern Art Inc
    Arts & Culture
    4
    Alliance Francaise De Sacramento

    To promote the French language and culture through language classes for adults and children, cultural events, and a French media center.

    Arts & Culture
    5
    American Society of the French Legion of Honor Inc
    —
    6
    San Francisco Filipino Cultural Center
    Arts & Culture
    7
    French Talent Usa

    The specific purposes of French Talent USA are to promote artistic, cultural and educational French and Francophone programs.

    Arts & Culture
    8
    French American Chamber of Commerce California

    Serving the needs of the french-american business community

    —
    9
    San Francisco City Guides

    Since 1978, our mission has been to preserve and perpetuate San Francisco's history and folklore and to celebrate its rich history of cultural diversity.

    Human Services
    10
    The French-American Foundation

    Founded in 1976, and building on more than two centuries of shared ideals between France and the United States, the French-American Foundation works to enrich a transatlantic relationship that is essential in todays world.

    International
    11
    San Francisco-Paris Sister City Committee Inc

    Developing relations between the cities of san francisco and paris in the fields of science, technology, economics, commerce and culture.

    International
    12
    San Francisco Plantation Foundation
    —
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is French American Foundation for Medical Research and Education; the most unlike its peers is San Francisco Basque Folkloric Groups. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    2
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    5/7
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Notre Dame de Victoires: $50,000 · OtherNotre Dame de VictoiresNOTRE DAME DES VICTOIRES CHURCH & SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherNOTRE DAME DES VICTOIRES CHURCH & SCHOOLFRENCH AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION: $40,000 · OtherFRENCH AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH AND EDU…St Anthonys Foundation: $20,000 · OtherSt Anthonys FoundationBASQUE EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATION: $15,000 · OtherBASQUE EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONSanta Rosa French American Charter School: $10,000 · OtherSanta Rosa French American Charter SchoolALLIANCE FRANCAISE: $125,234 · Arts & CultureALLIANCE FRANCAISESan Francisco Basque Folkloric Groups: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSan Francisco Basque Folkloric GroupsLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR HOME FOR THE AGED: $20,000 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $15,000 · InternationalAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,000 · Human ServicesREDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
    Other$185,000Arts & Culture$135,234Health$20,000International$15,000Human Services$15,000Housing & Shelter$10,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLIANCE FRANCAISE: $125,234 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetFRENCH AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION: $40,000 over 4y, 35% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR HOME FOR THE AGED: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSan Francisco Basque Folkloric Groups: $10,000 over 2y, 30% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

    Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Ligue Henri IV funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ligue Henri IV. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Ligue Henri IV?

      Find your warmest path to Ligue Henri IV through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $145k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Ligue Henri IV’s filings →

      More from the funding graph