Skip to content

· Public charity

Lifeprep Education System Inc

To provide secular educational & vocational programmming for jewish private schools needing resources programming and implementation within the states core curriculum.

$194k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$271kEducation$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $173,725, the rows itemized in this filing. The $193,752 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,027 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $115k
$8,250
Median grant
2
States reached
$202k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION YESHIVA OF GREATER MONSEY$31,200
YKOP OF PASSAIC$25,025
YESHIVA TORAH VADAATH$13,250
BNOS BAIS YAAKOV$12,500
TALMUD TORAH SIACH YITZCHOK$12,000
YESHIVA OHEL TORAH$11,000
NISHMAS HATORAH$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERKAZ HATORAH$8,250
YESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH$7,750
BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY$7,500
OHR YOSEF OF ROCKLAND COUNTY$6,000
SEMINAR$6,000
YESHIVA TIFERES YISROEL CHAIM$6,000
MEOR HATORAH$6,000
YESHIVA RABBI SAMSON REFOEL HIRSCH$5,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NISHMAS HATORAH: $10k → 6%BNOS BAIS YAAKOV: $13k → 13%BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY: $8k → 14%YESHIVA RABBI SAMSON REFOEL HIRSCH: $6k → 17%YESHIVA TIFERES YISROEL CHAIM: $6k → 20%YESHIVA OF TELSHE ALUMNI: $7k → 28%MASORES BNOS YISROEL: $8k → 11%YKOP OF PASSAIC: $25k → 12%NISHMAS HATORAH: $7k → 6%TALMUD TORAH SIACH YITZCHOK: $12k → 13%YESHIVA TIFERES SHMUEL: $1k → 14%SEMINAR: $6k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERKAZ HATORAH: $8k → 11%YKOP OF PASSAIC: $25k → 12%YESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH: $8k → 13%YESHIVA OHEL TORAH: $11k → 14%YESHIVAS NOVOMINSK: $6k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERKAZ HATORAH: $8k → 11%YKOP OF PASSAIC: $16k → 12%YESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY: $7k → 14%YESHIVA TORAH VADAATH: $13k → 20%BAIS AVROHOM: $7k → 11%YKOP OF PASSAIC: $11k → 12%YSV SPRING VALLEY: $700 → 14%YESHIVA TORAH VADAATH: $7k → 20%MEOR HATORAH: $6k → 11%YKOP OF PASSAIC: $3k → 12%ADOLPH H SCHREIBER HEBREW ACADEMY OF ROCKLAND: $6k → 14%BEIS AVROHOM: $6k → 11%CONGREGATION YESHIVA OF GREATER MONSEY: $31k → 14%MASORES BNOS YISROEL: $3k → 11%OHR YOSEF OF ROCKLAND COUNTY: $6k → 14%BNOS DEVORA: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Lifeprep Education System Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 42% of the giving stays in NJ; by stated purpose, 0%.

Lifeprep Education System Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$163k · 7 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$163k
$21k

Still filing today

29%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YN
    YESHIVA NISHMAS HATORAH INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $17k · revenue +103%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERCAZ HATORAH INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $16k · revenue +20%
  • MB
    MASORES BNOS YISROEL INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $11k · revenue +191%

Funded once

  • TA
    TELSHE ALUMNI BAIS HAMEDRASH
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • AH
    ADOLPH H SCHREIBER HEBREW ACADEMY OF ROCKLAND
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • YN
    YESHIVAS NOVOMINSK
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YKOP OF PASSAIC: $78,465 · OtherYKOP OF PASSAICCONGREGATION YESHIVA OF GREATER MONSEY INC: $31,200 · OtherCONGREGATION YESHIVA OF GREATER MONSEY INCYESHIVATH TORAH VODAATH: $20,550 · OtherYESHIVATH TORAH VODAATHAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERCAZ HATORAH INC: $15,905 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERCAZ HATORAH INCCONGREGATION BAIS AVROHOM INC: $12,150 · OtherSIACH YITZCHOK: $12,000 · OtherCONG MESIFTA OHEL TORAH INC: $11,000 · Other+13 more: $73,901 · Other+13 moreBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $12,500 · EducationMASORES BNOS YISROEL INC: $10,900 · EducationYESHIVA NISHMAS HATORAH INC: $16,800 · Religion
Other$255,171Education$23,400Religion$16,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERCAZ HATORAH INC: $15,905 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMASORES BNOS YISROEL INC: $10,900 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVA NISHMAS HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERCAZ HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds BNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY ↗
  • Who funds MASORES BNOS YISROEL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY36.6× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Kitov Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Gertrude and Morris Bienenfeld Charitable Foundation · Maalot · The Ezra Charitable Trust · The Fishoff Family Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lifeprep Education System Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lifeprep Education System Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Masores Bnos Yisroel Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lifeprep Education System Inc?

Find your warmest path to Lifeprep Education System Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lifeprep Education System’s filings →

More from the funding graph