Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lifeplus Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

International$480kHealth$181kFood & Nutrition$173kEducation$50kHuman Services$43kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kPhilanthropy$15kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,526
Median grant
4
States reached
$66k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFEPLUS FOUNDATION GGMBH$50,000
OUR FATHERS TABLE$5,000
THE WATER PROJECT INC$2,526
TARGET COMMUNITY SERVICES$2,000
RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 78% of grant dollars ($763k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 22% that went abroad ($218k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Coastal Womens Shelter: $20k → 14%The Filling Station: $20k → 17%THE FILLING STATION: $3k → 17%THE FILLING STATION: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
OR
CA
MD
AR
NC
DC
GA
FL

Beyond the US: 22% of all-years giving ($218k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Germany$150k · 5 grants
United Kingdom$68k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$772k · 9 repeat orgs$206k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +66% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
16

Total granted

$772k
$204k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+66%

Still filing today

56%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEducationYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WATER PROJECT INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $382k · revenue +92%
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    2× · 2019–2024 · $46k · revenue +67%
  • BH
    BATESVILLE HELP & HOPE INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $36k · revenue +21% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • JA
    JOINT AID MANAGEMENT (JAM) USA
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
  • CW
    COASTAL WOMEN'S SHELTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +62%
  • OF
    OZARK FOOTHILLS LITERACY PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +118% · 38% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Food Bank of Northeast Arkansas

The food bank of northeast arkansas provides hunger relief to people in need in twelve counties in northeast arkansas by raising awareness, securing resources, and distributing food through a network of non-profit agencies and programs.

Human Services
3
Food Bank of Northeast Louisiana Inc

Provide food, hope and dignity to our neighbors who struggle with hunger, and lead the movement to alleviate hunger through education, collaboration and advocacy.

Human Services
4
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
5
North Berwick Food Pantry

Our mission is to provide nutritous food and essential non-food items for those in need residing in north berwick, berwick, south berwick, lebanon and surrounding areas. we promise to offer our services with love and respect, and in a…

Food & Nutrition
6
Javesca Feeds Inc

Javesca Feeds purpose is to raise awareness and provide relief to help end hunger and malnutrition in poverty-stricken areas of the U.S. and around the world by connecting individual and corporate funding with front-line human relief…

Food & Nutrition
7
Interfaith Food Ministry Nevada County

A community where no one should feel the hurt of hunger. Interfaith Food Ministry feeds the hungry and works to reduce food insecurity in Nevada County. We help to sustain health, human dignity and the opportunity for individuals to…

Food & Nutrition
8
Feeding Avery Families Inc

Provide food at no cost to hungry people in need in avery county, nc and improve their health where possible

Food & Nutrition
9
Farmer Foodshare Inc

Our mission is to increase access to fresh, local food for all while supporting the viability of marginalized farmers to create a more equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
10
Urban Bicycle Food Ministry
Human Services
11
Berkeley Food Network

The berkeley food network (bfn) works to expand food assistance services to food-insecure berkeley residents. bfn was founded in 2016 to help establish a foundation of good health from which all berkeley residents can pursue opportunity by…

Food & Nutrition
12
Harvest Hope Food Bank

Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ozark Foothills Literacy Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE WATER PROJECT INC: $381,690 · InternationalTHE WATER PROJECT INCDIRECT RELIEF: $46,135 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF+1 more: $7,000 · InternationalLIFEPLUS FOUNDATION GGMBH: $159,876 · OtherLIFEPLUS FOUNDATION GGMBHIndividual grant recipient: $67,677 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJOINT AID MANAGEMENT (JAM) USA: $40,000 · OtherJOINT AID MANAGEMENT (JAM) USABATESVILLE HELP & HOPE INC: $35,500 · OtherBATESVILLE HELP & HOPE INCJOINT AID MANAGEMENT (JAM): $25,000 · OtherJOINT AID MANAGEMENT (JAM)Target Community & Edu Svcs: $20,000 · OtherMercy Corp: $20,000 · OtherTARGET COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15,500 · Other+8 more: $41,500 · Other+8 moreTHE FILLING STATION INC: $26,000 · Human ServicesCOASTAL WOMEN'S SHELTER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionOUR FATHERS TABLE II INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionOZARK FOOTHILLS LITERACY PROJECT: $20,000 · EducationFORAFRIKA USA: $12,000 · ReligionBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIKE BOX PROJECT: $3,000 · Philanthropy
International$434,825Other$425,053Human Services$46,000Food & Nutrition$30,000Education$20,000Religion$12,000Youth Development$10,000Philanthropy$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE WATER PROJECT INC: $381,690 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $46,135 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBATESVILLE HELP & HOPE INC: $35,500 over 5y, 30% of budgetTHE FILLING STATION INC: $26,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetCOASTAL WOMEN'S SHELTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetOZARK FOOTHILLS LITERACY PROJECT: $20,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR FATHERS TABLE II INC: $15,000 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetFORAFRIKA USA: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGroundswell International Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBIKE BOX PROJECT: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetReligious Community Services of New Bern: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE WATER PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds BATESVILLE HELP & HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FILLING STATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL WOMEN'S SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OZARK FOOTHILLS LITERACY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR FATHERS TABLE II INC ↗
  • Who funds FORAFRIKA USA ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Groundswell International Inc ↗
  • Who funds BIKE BOX PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Religious Community Services of New Bern ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Harold H Bate Foundation IncNC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Harold H Bate Foundation Inc · International Paper Company Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lifeplus Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lifeplus Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lifeplus’ filings →

    More from the funding graph