· Public charity
Lifelink Foundation Inc
To honor donors and save lives through organ and tissue donation.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $202,719 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $240,532 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $37,813 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $193k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LIFELINK LEGACY FUND | $192,719 |
| TAMPA HILLSBOROUGH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +89% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LLLIFELINK LEGACY FUND8× · 2017–2025 · $891k · revenue +100%
- DLDONATE LIFE AMERICA7× · 2018–2024 · $129k · revenue +25%
- THTAMPA HILLSBOROUGH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION8× · 2018–2025 · $80k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- TFTRANSPLANT FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $281k · revenue 0%
- LOLIFEGIFT ORGAN DONATION CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +69%
- DLDonate Life Californiagraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +185%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To honor donors and save lives through organ and tissue donation. (expanded mission on schedule o)
We honor life through donation.
Our mission: the alliance unites the organ donation, transplantation and healthcare communities to promote collaboration, cascade innovations and share effective practices for the benefit of restoring lives through transplantation.our…
Saving lives by honoring the gift of organ and tissue donation with dignity and compassion.
The transplantation society provides the focus for global leadership in transplantation for the development of the science and clinical practice, scientific communication, continuing education and guidance on the ethical practice.
We provide innovative human biologic solutions that maximize the gift of donation.
To save and enhance the lives of as many people as possible through organ and tissue donation.
The south texas blood & tissue center supplies blood to more than 100 hospitals throughout texas and supports tissue, research/new therapies, and umbilical cord blood/birth tissue donations.
Gift of life donor program, the tax-exempt non-profit federally designated organization serving the eastern half of pennsylvania, southern new jersey, and delaware, is responsible for recovering and allocating organs and tissues used in…
The mission of legacy of life hawai'i is to save and enhance lives through recovering organs and tissue for transplant; encourage organ donation through community outreach and education; and honor and support organ donors and their families
Ast is a diverse organization dedicated to advancing the field of transplantation and improving patient care by promoting research, education, advocacy, organ donation, and service to the community through a lens of equity and inclusion.
Onelegacy saves and heals lives through organ, eye and tissue donation, comforts the families we serve, and inspires our communities to donate life.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifelink Legacy Fund and the most unlike its peers is Tampa Hillsborough Economic Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LIFELINK LEGACY FUND ↗
- Who funds TRANSPLANT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DONATE LIFE AMERICA ↗
- Who funds TAMPA HILLSBOROUGH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Association for Multcultural Affairs in Transplantation ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF ORGAN PROCUREMENT ORGANIZATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LIONS WORLD VISION INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BIOFLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds LIFEGIFT ORGAN DONATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds Donate Life California ↗
- Who funds Orlando Health Inc ↗
- Who funds American Association of Tissue Banks Inc ↗
- Who funds University of South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Georgia Transplant Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lifelink Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bioflorida Inc — 0% of income from government
- Orlando Health Inc — 0% of income from government
- Florida Health Sciences Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.