Skip to content

· Private foundation

Life in Color

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$25kInternational$21kYouth Development$14kHealth$4kFood & Nutrition$4kRecreation & Sports$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kPhilanthropy$980Other$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,783
Median grant
1
States reached
$19k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROAR AS ONE INC$1,783
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 89% of grant dollars ($67k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($8k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HARVEST HOME: $3k → 10%HARVEST HOME: $3k → 10%HARVEST HOME: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
NC
TX

Beyond the US: 11% of all-years giving ($8k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$4k · 5 grants
Japan$4k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of Life in Color’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Life in Colorlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 27% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$50k · 8 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
19

Total granted

$50k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+20%

Still filing today

50%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    Harvest Home Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $7k · revenue +53%
  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Global
    2× · 2017–2023 · $3k · revenue +82%
  • NI
    NEWBORNS IN NEED INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • J
    JUSTGIVING
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • TF
    TEAMS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childfund International Usa

Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…

International
2
Childfund Alliance

Childfund alliance is a global network of 11 child-focused development and humanitarian organizations working in more than 70 countries. we help nearly 30 million children and their families to overcome poverty and the underlying…

International
3
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
4
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

—
5
Children's Rights Inc

Children's rights is a national advocacy organization that investigates, exposes, and combats violations of the rights of children. through strategic advocacy and civil rights impact litigation, children's rights holds governments…

Civil Rights
6
Safe Kids Worldwide

Safe kids worldwide is a global nonprofit organization dedicated to preventing childhood injuries.

Health
7
Feed the Children Inc

We are a global movement working to end child hunger in the u.s. and around the world. together with communities, we provide food, essentials, and opportunities so every child can survive and thrive.

International
8
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
9
BABY2BABY

Baby2baby provides children in need across the country with diapers, formula, clothing and all the basic necessities that every child deserves.

Unclassified
10
Unicef Usa Impact Fund for Children Inc

The unicef usa impact fund for children exists to develop and implement financial solutions to ensure every child is healthy, educated, protected, and respected. we believe truly scalable, long-term impact will only be accomplished when we…

Philanthropy
11
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
12
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF NUTRE HOGAR INC: $14,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF NUTRE HOGAR INCROAR AS ONE INC: $8,783 · OtherROAR AS ONE INCIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJUSTGIVING: $3,287 · OtherJUSTGIVINGIndividual grant recipient: $3,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEAMS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $2,620 · OtherNATIONAL FALLEN FIREFIGHTERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,950 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,884 · Other+8 more: $5,644 · Other+8 moreTRINITY BOSTON CONNECTS INC: $8,500 · Youth DevelopmentTRINITY BOST…Harvest Home Inc: $6,500 · Human ServicesHarvest Hom…THE LUNCHBOX FUND: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE LUNCHBO…Ronald McDonald House Global: $3,250 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $296 · HealthCHILDREN INCORPORATED: $1,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,000 · InternationalNEWBORNS IN NEED INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyMY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Education
Other$49,368Youth Development$8,500Human Services$7,500Health$3,546International$3,000Philanthropy$2,000Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRINITY BOSTON CONNECTS INC: $8,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHarvest Home Inc: $6,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $3,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FALLEN FIREFIGHTERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWBORNS IN NEED INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LUNCHBOX FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN INCORPORATED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $296 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRINITY BOSTON CONNECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Harvest Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FALLEN FIREFIGHTERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEWBORNS IN NEED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LUNCHBOX FUND ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds MY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Life in Color funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Life in Color. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • National Fallen Firefighters Foundation: 24% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Life in Color’s filings →

More from the funding graph