Skip to content

· Private foundation

Li Hakesef Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$101k
Granted FY2021
70
Grants FY2021
10
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0160% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Religion$176kHousing & Shelter$40kArts & Culture$10kPhilanthropy$4kHuman Services$4kYouth Development$2kEnvironment$1kHealth$880Other$0
02FY2021 · 70 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k67 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $63k
$205
Median grant
10
States reached
$26k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
566 Maple Realty llc$40,000
Cha bad of the Nyacks$13,000
Chabad of the Nyacs$10,000
Jewish Curacio INC$3,600
Cha bad Jewish Center$3,500
Hillel$3,000
Mesivta Ohr Temimim Lubavitch$2,700
Mesivta Ohr Temimim Lubavitch$2,700
Tzivos Hashem$2,500
tzivos hashem$2,500
Cha bad of Ocean$1,500
Bais Shea Anshei Lubavitch$1,000
tzivos hashem$1,000
Cha bad of the Oceans$1,000
Chabad of Golden Beach$850
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $884) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Misaskim: $54 → 20%Bonei Olam: $500 → 20%Bonei Olam: $180 → 20%Bonei Olam: $150 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
NV
PA
NJ
CA
MD
AZ
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$171k · 40 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2021, 23 since wound down; 43 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
118

Total granted

$171k
$129k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+51%

Still filing today

8%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
ReligionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $4k · revenue +3%
  • LS
    Likras Shabbos Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $2k · revenue +42%
  • BO
    Bonei Olam Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $830 · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • CO
    Chabad of the Nyack
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
2
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
3
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
4
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
5
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
6
Chabad of Bensonhurst Inc

Chabad of Bensonhurst Inc is an organization dedicated to furthering the religious, educational, and charitable needs of the Jewish Community.

—
7
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
8
Congregation Jewish Spiritual Shabbas Inc
Religion
9
Meir Isa Bracha Inc

To help establish and maintain agendas for Hebrew and religious enlightenment

Religion
10
Chevrah Lomdei Mishnah Inc

Promoting study of Mishnah and other Jewish texts

Religion
11
Rabbinical Organization - Chabad Lubavitch Inc

Organized lectures, symposiums, attended conference, donations of books to libraries. To promote jewish education.

Religion
12
Minyan Oneg Shabbat

Religious and educational services

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cheder Chabad of Monsey; the most unlike its peers is Misaskim Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 201 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/15
Grantees still filing
14/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

566 Maple Realty llc: $40,000 · Other566 Maple Realty llcCHABAD OF THE NYACKS INC: $27,100 · OtherCHABAD OF THE NYACKS INCChabad Jewish Center: $19,500 · OtherChabad Jewish CenterTZIVOS HASHEM: $17,986 · Other+183 more: $253,902 · Other+183 moreLikras Shabbos Inc: $1,666 · ReligionCHABAD OF GRAVESEND INC: $1,500 · ReligionLAHAK HANOCHOS INC: $1,210 · ReligionBRIS AVROHOM INC: $180 · ReligionKeren Uforatzto Inc: $180 · Religion+1 more: $50 · ReligionCROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC: $3,540 · PhilanthropyCHASDEI SOUL II SOUL INC: $500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $100 · PhilanthropyBonei Olam Inc: $830 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $54 · Human ServicesCHEDER CHABAD OF MONSEY: $100 · EducationMEOR INC: $100 · Education
Other$358,488Religion$4,786Philanthropy$4,140Human Services$884Education$200

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC: $3,540 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLikras Shabbos Inc: $1,666 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLAHAK HANOCHOS INC: $1,210 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $830 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHASDEI SOUL II SOUL INC: $500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMaimonides Jewish Day School: $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUBAVITCH GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKeren Uforatzto Inc: $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHEDER CHABAD OF MONSEY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAS D'VAR TORAH INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEOR INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChabad Lubavitch of Maine Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bracha Vehatzlacha Foundation IncNY22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bracha Vehatzlacha Foundation Inc · Nash Charity Foundation Inc · Eom - Freund Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Barber Family Foundation · Lets Make It Happen Ny Inc · Alyad Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Ben-Abou Foundation · Maon Noam Inc · Chabad on Campus International Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Li Hakesef Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Li Hakesef Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Li Hakesef Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Li Hakesef Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 201 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Li Hakesef’s filings →

    More from the funding graph