Skip to content
Lexys Little Angels Dachsund Hospice and Hote at a glance

· Private foundation

Lexys Little Angels Dachsund Hospice and Hote

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$523
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$523
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Animals$9kEducation$132Philanthropy$50Religion$48
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$523
Median grant
1
States reached
$10k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Animal Rescue Corps$523
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PROMISED LAND: $2k → 11%Cherished Tails Senior Sanctuary: $50 → 15%HAPPY TAILS DOG RESCUE INC: $227 → 7%DACHSHUNS WORLD CHARITIES: $263 → 11%PROMISED LAND DACHSHUND SANCTUARY: $100 → 16%LG LARGE ANIMAL RESCUE: $60 → 15%MCGRIFF DOG SANCTARY: $25 → 16%Animal Rescue Corps: $523 → 14%DOLLAR FOR DOXIES: $25 → 11%PROMISED LAND DACHSUND SANCTUARY: $50 → 10%ARABIAN HORSEMENS DISTRESS FUND: $200 → 9%Piglet International Inc: $132 → 9%OLD FRIENDS SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY: $25 → 7%National Mill Dog Rescue: $133 → 9%Hearts4Doxies Rescue: $131 → 9%LITTLE PAWS DACHSHUND RESCUE: $25 → 13%ALL PAWS FOR THE PAWS: $1k → 11%HAPPY TAILS DACHSUND RESCUE INC: $70 → 7%DACHSHUND WORLD CHARITIES: $184 → 11%PROMISED LAND DACHSHUND SANCTUARY: $100 → 16%ANIMAL RESCUE CORP: $320 → 14%CABRA: $750 → 11%HAPPY TAILS DOG RESCUEINC: $50 → 7%DACHSHUND WORK CHARITIES: $178 → 11%ANIMAL RESCUE CORP: $300 → 14%LOVE OUR DOGS: $300 → 11%DACHSUND WORLD CHARITIES: $66 → 11%ANIMAL RESCUE CORP: $300 → 14%AZ SMALL DOG RESCUE: $150 → 11%DACHSUND WORLD CHARITIES: $49 → 11%ANIMAL RESCUE CORP: $175 → 14%I LOVE DOGS: $77 → 11%DACHSUND WORLD CHARITIES: $39 → 11%ANIMAL RESCUE CORP: $167 → 14%WARM BED DACHSHUNDS: $72 → 11%ANIMAL RESCUE CORP: $50 → 14%JR CARES: $66 → 11%NETWORK FOR GOOD: $50 → 14%ALL PAWS FOR THE CAUSE: $51 → 11%HORSEMANS DISTRESS: $50 → 11%HAPPY TAILS DACHSHUND RESCUE: $50 → 11%PHOENIX RESCUE MISSION: $48 → 11%MAYDAY PITBULL RESCUE ADVOCACY: $25 → 11%PACC911: $25 → 11%PACC911: $25 → 11%HOME FUR GOOD RESCUE: $15 → 11%HOME FUR GOOD RESCUE: $15 → 11%LOST OUR HOME PET RESCUE: $25 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
CT
CO
MD
AZ
AR
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2k · 6 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
33

Total granted

$2k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+10%

Still filing today

33%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $523 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsRecreation & SportsEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AR
    ANIMAL RESCUE CORP
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1k
  • PL
    PROMISED LAND DACHSHUND SANCTUARY INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $200 · revenue +20%
  • DW
    DACHSUND WORLD CHARITIES
    3× · 2019–2022 · $154

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • AP
    ALL PAWS FOR THE PAWS
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • C
    CABRA
    one grant, 2023 · $750
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Donna's Love Pet Rescue
Animals
2
Forgotten Tails Animal Rescue Inc

Saving dogs

Animals
3
Raskels Rescue
Animals
4
Great Dawg Rescue Inc
Animals
5
The Adoptable Dog
Animals
6
Desert Dog Rescue Inc

Animal rescue

Animals
7
Fred's Mission Rescue and Sanctuary

Rescue dogs, which includes housing, vetting, and transport.

Animals
8
Happy Acres Pet Rescue
Animals
9
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
10
Puppy Dog Ranch

A small No Kill Rescue and Sanctuary for unwanted, homeless, abused, neglected, blind, deaf, disabled, medically dependent, special needs and unadoptable dogs and puppies.

Animals
11
Freedom Tails Ohio

Animal Rescue

Animals
12
Rescuesforjojo

Dog rescue

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Happy Tails Dachshund Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is Happy Tails Dog Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $2,155 · OtherIndividual grant recipientANIMAL RESCUE CORP: $1,312 · OtherANIMAL RESCUE CORPALL PAWS FOR THE PAWS: $1,104 · OtherALL PAWS FOR THE PAWSCABRA: $750 · OtherCABRACoalition of All Breed Rescue Arizona: $350 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $300 · Other+22 more: $2,010 · Other+22 moreAnimal Rescue Corps Inc: $523 · AnimalsAnimal Rescue…Happy Tails Dog Rescue Inc: $227 · AnimalsHappy Tails D…PROMISED LAND DACHSHUND SANCTUARY INC: $200 · AnimalsPROMISED LAND…CHERISHED TAILS SENIOR SANCTUARY: $50 · AnimalsHAPPY TAILS DACHSHUND RESCUE INC: $50 · Animals+4 more: $106 · Animals+4 moreNational Mill Dog Rescue: $133 · Recreation & SportsPIGLET INTERNATIONAL INC: $132 · EducationNETWORK FOR GOOD: $50 · Public Safety & DisasterPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $48 · Religion
Other$7,981Animals$1,156Recreation & Sports$133Education$132Public Safety & Disaster$50Religion$48

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHappy Tails Dog Rescue Inc: $227 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPROMISED LAND DACHSHUND SANCTUARY INC: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNational Mill Dog Rescue: $133 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIGLET INTERNATIONAL INC: $132 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHERISHED TAILS SENIOR SANCTUARY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAPPY TAILS DACHSHUND RESCUE INC: $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $48 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLD FRIENDS SENIOR DOGS INC: $31 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOLLAR FOR DOXIES INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLost Our Home Pet Foundation: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Animal Rescue Corps Inc ↗
  • Who funds Happy Tails Dog Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROMISED LAND DACHSHUND SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds National Mill Dog Rescue ↗
  • Who funds PIGLET INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHERISHED TAILS SENIOR SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds HAPPY TAILS DACHSHUND RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds OLD FRIENDS SENIOR DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds DOLLAR FOR DOXIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Lost Our Home Pet Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE PAWS DACHSHUND RESCUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

McKesson Foundation I…Petsmart Charities IncPaypal Charitable Giv…The Pfizer Foundation…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
McKesson Foundation IncTX14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: McKesson Foundation Inc · Petsmart Charities Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lexys Little Angels Dachsund Hospice and Hote funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lexys Little Angels Dachsund Hospice and Hote. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lexys Little Angels Dachsund Hospice and Hote’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home