Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lexington Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$66kHousing & Shelter$4kHuman Services$2k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,400
Median grant
2
States reached
$197k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY FEINBERG SCHOOL OF MEDICIN$1,400
ESOPHAGEAL CANCER ACTION NETWORK$1,400
AMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION$1,400
THE MAGNOLIA TREE FOUNDATION$950
GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE$950
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$950
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%AMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%AMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%AMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%AMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%AMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%AMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%FAMILY SHELTER SERVICE: $250 → 7%AMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%AMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$69k · 10 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +116% since the first grant, against +55% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$69k
$250

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+116%
+55%

Still filing today

70%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AB
    AMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +180%
  • EC
    ESOPHAGEAL CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +137%
  • PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • FS
    Family Shelter Service Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $250 · revenue +55%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
5
International Cancer Advocacy Network

Ican's mission is two-fold: to optimize stage iv cancer patient survival and work to attain the highest possible quality of life. ican assists stage iv cancer patients with 1) direct patient navigation and customized advocacy services; 2)…

Philanthropy
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
8
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
11
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Family Shelter Service Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ESOPHAGEAL CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $12,400 · HealthESOPHAGEAL CANCER ACTION NETWORK INCPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $11,000 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INCALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $9,450 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INCGIGI'S PLAYHOUSE INC: $6,950 · HealthGIGI'S PLAYHOUSE INCBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $4,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCAMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $12,400 · Human ServicesAMERICAN BREAST CANC…+1 more: $250 · Human ServicesMAGNOLIA TREE FOUNDATION: $7,950 · OtherMAGNOLIA TREE FOUN…MIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETS: $2,250 · OtherMIDWEST SHELTER FO…THE SALVATION ARMY: $1,250 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYNorthwestern University: $1,400 · Recreation & SportsDUPAGE PADS INC: $1,250 · Housing & Shelter
Health$43,800Human Services$12,650Other$11,450Recreation & Sports$1,400Housing & Shelter$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $12,400 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetESOPHAGEAL CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $12,400 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $9,450 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGIGI'S PLAYHOUSE INC: $6,950 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDUPAGE PADS INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Shelter Service Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ESOPHAGEAL CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds DUPAGE PADS INC ↗
  • Who funds Family Shelter Service Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lexington Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lexington Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lexington Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lexington Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lexington’s filings →

    More from the funding graph