Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lewis Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$86kHuman Services$65kFood & Nutrition$32kHousing & Shelter$14kPhilanthropy$12kInternational$11kHealth$5kCommunity Improvement$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$491k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONE CITY EARLY LEARNING CENTER$5,760
GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER$5,100
UW FOUNDATION$3,600
SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN$3,000
BREAKTHROUGH T1D WISCONSIN$2,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,000
SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN$1,000
WAUNAKEE NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTION$1,000
BUCKETS FOR HUNGER$1,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$500
UNICEF USA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $7k → 10%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 10%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 10%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 10%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 10%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 10%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 10%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 10%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 10%WAUNAKEE NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTION: $1k → 10%WAUNAKEE NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTION: $1k → 10%WAUNAKEE NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTION: $1k → 10%WAUNAKEE NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTION: $1k → 10%EAST MADISONMONONA COALITION OF THE AGING (EMMCA): $300 → 10%ONE CITY EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $7k → 10%ONE CITY EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $6k → 10%ONE CITY EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $6k → 10%ONE CITY EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $6k → 10%ONE CITY EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $6k → 10%ONE CITY EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $6k → 10%ONE CITY EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $6k → 10%ONE CITY EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $6k → 10%ONE CITY EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$223k · 16 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
8

Total granted

$223k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+46%

Still filing today

75%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalPhilanthropyEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IA
    IRWIN A AND ROBERT D GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $53k · revenue +113%
  • OC
    ONE CITY SCHOOLS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $52k · revenue ×14
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +46%
  • WA
    WAUNAKEE AREA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • MF
    MERITER FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Madison Community Foundation

Madison community foundation will engage greater madison in philanthropy to advance a more vibrant and equitable community.

Philanthropy
2
Wisconsin Waterfowl Association Inc

The purpose of the association shall be to restore and conserve wisconsin's waterfowl and wetland resources; to educate state waterfowlers during their progression from natural resource consumer to steward; and to promote governmental…

Environment
3
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
4
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
5
United Way of Wisconsin Inc

United way of wisconsin is dedicated to supporting and enriching a strong statewide united way network that maximizes the capacity of local united ways to address human needs, improve lives and create lasting positive change across…

Philanthropy
6
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
7
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
8
My Choice Wisconsin Inc

We inspire people to experience life at its fullest by encouraging ownership of health, fostering independence, and serving the whole person; and do so with an unwavering commitment as stewards of medicaid funding.

Health
9
University of Wisconsin - River Falls Foundation Inc

An independent, not for profit wisconsin corporation, the uwrf foundation is organized solely for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-river falls. private giving to the foundation is essential in raising the level of excellence at…

Education
10
Goodwill Industries of North Central Wisconsin Inc

Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.

Human Services
11
United Way of Dane County Inc

Unite the community to achieve measurable results that change lives.

—
12
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meriter Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IRWIN A AND ROBERT D GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $53,400 · Human ServicesIRWIN A AND ROBERT D GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER INCONE CITY SCHOOLS INC: $52,360 · Human ServicesONE CITY SCHOOLS INCWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $7,480 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC+3 more: $6,800 · Human Services+3 moreHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC: $9,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANI…Individual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…UNICEF UNITED STATES FUND: $5,200 · OtherUNICEF UNITED STAT…WNC COMMUNITY VIABILITY FUND: $4,080 · OtherWNC COMMUNITY VIAB…COMMUNITY ACTION COALITION FOR SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC: $2,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION C…WAUNAKEE AREA FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · OtherBREAKTHROUGH T1D WISCONSIN: $2,000 · OtherCLEAN LAKES ALLIANCE INC: $3,000 · OtherCLEAN LAKES ALLIAN…+5 more: $3,700 · Other+5 moreUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $33,250 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF W…SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI: $27,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST…BUCKETS FOR HUNGER INC: $4,000 · Food & NutritionBUCKETS FOR HU…Waunakee Community Foundation Inc: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMERITER FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · PhilanthropyTHE ALY WOLFF FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · PhilanthropyMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $500 · InternationalPORCHLIGHT INC: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$120,040Other$38,480Education$33,250Food & Nutrition$31,000Philanthropy$8,000International$5,500Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIRWIN A AND ROBERT D GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $53,400 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetONE CITY SCHOOLS INC: $52,360 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $33,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI: $27,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $7,480 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPORCHLIGHT INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWaunakee Community Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWaunakee Neighborhood Connection: $4,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBUCKETS FOR HUNGER INC: $4,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetCLEAN LAKES ALLIANCE INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION COALITION FOR SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERITER FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALY WOLFF FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMON WEALTH DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IRWIN A AND ROBERT D GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE CITY SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PORCHLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds Waunakee Community Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Waunakee Neighborhood Connection ↗
  • Who funds BUCKETS FOR HUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN LAKES ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION COALITION FOR SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds MERITER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ALY WOLFF FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON WEALTH DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds NEWBRIDGE MADISON INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Evjue Foundation IncWI22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Evjue Foundation Inc · Trustage Foundation Inc · Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc · Veridian Foundation Inc · United Way of Dane County Inc · Madison Community Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Madison Rotary Foundation · The Roots and Wings Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Cummings-Christensen Family Foundation · Hooper Corp Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lewis Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lewis Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lewis Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph