Skip to content
Levis a Tr-A & R Levis Fdn-Jlm Ttee at a glance

· Private foundation

Levis a Tr-A & R Levis Fdn-Jlm Ttee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$424k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$192k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$935kInternational$489kHealth$485kPhilanthropy$300kArts & Culture$90kReligion$80kAnimals$68kHousing & Shelter$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $297k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FDN$192,000
ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY$105,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$35,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEAC$25,000
RUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SE$15,000
BOCA WEST CHILDRENS FOUNDATION$15,000
JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICE$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE TEL AVIV UNI$10,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$10,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND - USA$5,000
DIAMOND VISION FOUNDATION$1,722
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $998k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $25k → 6%BOCA WEST CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $25k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $18k → 6%BOCA WEST CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%BOCA WEST CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%BOCA WEST CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY: $240k → 11%ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY: $170k → 11%ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY: $130k → 11%ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY: $125k → 11%ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY: $105k → 11%ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY: $105k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 14 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$2.4M
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+61%

Still filing today

79%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AR
    ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $875k · revenue +41%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    4× · 2020–2024 · $245k · revenue +198%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $209k · revenue +211%

Funded once

  • JA
    JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +33%
  • FF
    FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CE
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • TV
    THE VOLEN CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Bnai Jacob Foundation
—
2
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Jewish Life Foundation
—
4
Sherit Isroel
—
5
Bais Yisrael Foundation
—
6
University of Judaism Foundation
—
7
Bronfman Youth Fellowships to Israel in Inc
Youth Development
8
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
9
The Jerusalem Connection
—
10
Israel and Ruth Berkowitz Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
11
Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc

Jewish national fund gives all generations of jews a unique voice in building a prosperous future for the land of israel and its people.

International
12
Bnei Moshe
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Boca West Children's Foundation Fka Boca West Community Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $875,000 · Human ServicesADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER I…ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $68,000 · Human ServicesISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLINDBOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION FKA BOCA WEST COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $55,000 · Human ServicesBOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION FKA BOCA WEST…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $245,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF M…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $209,300 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL…+2 more: $25,000 · InternationalJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEAC: $300,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF …RUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SE: $80,000 · OtherRUTH & NORMAN RALES J…JARC: $65,000 · OtherJARC+5 more: $29,722 · Other+5 moreBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $292,000 · Community ImprovementBoca Raton Re…Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $150,000 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $30,000 · HealthJEWISH EDUCATION IN MEDIA INC DBA JBS JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICE: $25,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterThe Mathew Forbes Romer Foundation Inc: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$998,000International$479,300Other$474,722Community Improvement$292,000Health$180,000Arts & Culture$25,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $875,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $292,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $245,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $209,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $68,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION FKA BOCA WEST COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATION IN MEDIA INC DBA JBS JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICE: $25,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC: $15,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetThe Mathew Forbes Romer Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetISRAEL CANCER ASSOCIATION (USA) CORP: $3,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Levis a Tr-A & R Levis Fdn-Jlm Ttee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Levis a Tr-A & R Levis Fdn-Jlm Ttee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Jewish Association for Residential Care Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Levis a Tr-A & R Levis Fdn-Jlm Ttee’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home