Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leslie and Loretta Copeland Foundation Tr

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$565k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.6MReligion$1.0MArts & Culture$462kHuman Services$460kYouth Development$385kHealth$165kHousing & Shelter$125kPhilanthropy$110k
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k15 grants · $320k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $245k
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEREA COLLEGE$80,000
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$65,000
SOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC$50,000
ST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$50,000
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$30,000
BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE$30,000
URGENT INC$25,000
ST JOSEPH'S CHURCH$25,000
CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH$25,000
MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY$20,000
NORTH LAWNDALE COLLEGE$20,000
THE CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
MISERICORIDA HOME$20,000
GARRETT EVANGELICAL THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$20,000
MCGAW YMCA$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $620k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%URGENT INC: $25k → 15%URGENT INC: $25k → 15%URGENT INC: $25k → 15%URGENT INC: $25k → 15%URGENT INC: $25k → 15%URGENT INC: $20k → 15%URGENT INC: $20k → 15%MISERICORIDA HOME: $25k → 14%URGENT INC: $20k → 15%MISERICORIDA HOME: $20k → 14%MISERICORIDA HOME: $20k → 14%MISERICORIDA HOME: $20k → 14%EAST RIDGE RETIREMENT VILLAGE: $30k → 15%MISERICORIDA HOME: $20k → 14%EAST RIDGE RETIREMENT VILLAGE: $30k → 15%MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%EAST RIDGE RETIREMENT VILLAGE: $20k → 15%MISERICORIDA HOME: $20k → 14%EAST RIDGE RETIREMENT VILLAGE: $20k → 15%MISERICORIDA HOME: $20k → 14%MCGAW YMCA: $25k → 14%McGaw YMCA: $25k → 14%MCGAW YMCA: $20k → 14%MCGAW YMCA: $20k → 14%McGaw YMCA: $20k → 14%MCGAW YMCA: $20k → 14%McGaw YMCA: $20k → 14%McGaw YMCA: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 22 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
2

Total granted

$4.3M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+52%

Still filing today

45%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BEREA COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $645k · revenue +50%
  • UO
    University of Miami
    8× · 2017–2024 · $475k · revenue +96%
  • SOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $358k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • MC
    Marrilac Center Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • MISERICORDIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
2
University of Miami
—
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
5
Mount Mary University Inc

Mount mary university, an urban catholic university for women sponsored by the school sisters of notre dame, provides an environment for the development of the whole person. the university encourages leadership, integrity, and a deep sense…

—
6
Morehouse School of Medicine

Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…

Education
7
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
8
Musc Strategic Ventures

To promote and support the educational, medical, scientific, and research purposes of the medical university of south carolina "musc", and university medical associates of the medical university of south carolina "uma", including their…

Health
9
Minnesota Institute for Talented Youth

Mity's mission is to inspire and challenge intellectually curious students to pursue their passions within a diverse, inclusive community and empower them by building skills and relationships for lifelong success.

—
10
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
11
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Florida Public Media Group Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Miami. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $515,000 · OtherST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCHHOPE IGNITES CHICAGO: $200,000 · OtherHOPE IGNITES CHICAGOEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $190,000 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONST JOSEPHS CHURCH: $185,000 · OtherST JOSEPHS CHURCHNORTH LAWNDALE COLLEGE: $185,000 · OtherNORTH LAWNDALE COLLEGESt Judes Childrens Research Hospital: $165,000 · OtherSt Judes Childrens Research HospitalMARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY: $140,000 · OtherMARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILYHabitat for Humanity: $125,000 · OtherHabitat for HumanityCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $110,000 · OtherDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $90,000 · OtherGarrett Evangelical Theological Sem: $85,000 · Other+5 more: $262,000 · Other+5 moreBEREA COLLEGE: $645,000 · EducationBEREA COLLEGEUniversity of Miami: $475,000 · EducationUniversity of MiamiURGENT INC: $185,000 · Human ServicesURGENT INCYoung Mens Christian Assoc McGaw Inc: $170,000 · Human ServicesYoung Mens Chris…MISERICORDIA HOME: $145,000 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA HOM…East Ridge Retirement Village Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesEast Ridge Retir…+1 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC: $357,500 · Arts & CultureSOUTH FLO…SOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC: $32,500 · Health
Other$2,252,000Education$1,120,000Human Services$620,000Arts & Culture$357,500Health$32,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBEREA COLLEGE: $645,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $475,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC: $357,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHOPE IGNITES CHICAGO: $200,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetURGENT INC: $185,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Assoc McGaw Inc: $170,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME: $145,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEast Ridge Retirement Village Inc: $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $90,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC: $32,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BEREA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IGNITES CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds URGENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Young Mens Christian Assoc McGaw Inc ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA HOME ↗
  • Who funds East Ridge Retirement Village Inc ↗
  • Who funds DANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL12.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leslie and Loretta Copeland Foundation Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leslie and Loretta Copeland Foundation Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leslie and Loretta Copeland Foundation Tr’s filings →

More from the funding graph