Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Centers for Dialysis Care Foundation

To acquire or receive from any persons, firms, associations, corporations, trusts, or foundations by deed, gift, purchase, bequest, devise, or otherwise, cash, securities, and other property, real and personal, and to hold, administer, manage, invest, reinvest and disburse the principial and income

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Health$18MCommunity Improvement$138kEducation$128kHuman Services$30kOther$408k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $79k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $165k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$74,230
Median grant
3
States reached
$46M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY DIALYSIS CENTER$1,118,148
KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF OHIO$90,500
MINORITY ORGAN & TISSUE TRANP EDUCPRGRAM$74,230
AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND$35,000
AIPNO$25,000
NONPROFIT KIDNEY CARE ALLIANCE$18,900
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ELIZA BRYANT VILLAGE: $15k → 17%ELIZA BRYANT VILLAGE: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19M · 14 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$19M
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+42%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UH
    UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2.6M · revenue +65%
  • KF
    KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF OHIO INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $658k · revenue +26%
  • MO
    MINORITY ORGAN AND TISSUE TRANSPLANT EDUCATION PROGRAM OF CLEVELAND INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $563k · revenue +204% · 69% of their budget

Funded once

  • THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +42%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association of Kidney Patients Inc

AAKP is dedicated to improving the lives and long-term outcome of kidney patients. Cont on Sch O.

Health
2
National Kidney Foundation of Michigan Inc

To prevent kidney disease and improve the quality of life for those living with it.

Health
3
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Group Return

Caring for life, researching for health and educating those who serve.

Health
4
Habib Alrahman Charity Foundation

The mission of habib alrahman charity foundation (hacf) is to establish a kideny center in sudan called hacf kidney center, which will help patients with kidney (renal)problems in sudan. kidney problems are very common in sudan and the…

Health
5
National Association of Nephrology Technologists (Nant)

The mission of the national association of nephrology technologists (nant) is to promote the highest quality of care for chronic kidney disease (ckd) patients through education and professionalism. nant's goals are to provide educational…

6
National Kidney Foundation of Illinois

The national kidney foundation of illinois improves the health and well-being of people at risk for or affected by kidney disease through prevention, education, and empowerment.

7
Dialysis Clinic Inc

The primary responsibility of dialysis clinic inc. (dci) is to provide comprehensive and specialized care to patients living with chronic kidney disease (ckd) and end stage renal disease (esrd).

Health
8
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
9
Northwest Kidney Centers

Northwest kidney centers' (nkc) mission is to promote the optimal health, quality of life and independence of people with kidney disease through patient care, education and research. northwest kidney centers is a not-for-profit, locally…

Health
10
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
11
Central Florida Kidney Centers Inc

Our mission is to provide exceptional dialysis care and services to individuals with end-stage kidney disease throughout central florida. we are dedicated to expanding access to treatment and ensuring all those in need receive quality…

Health
12
National Kidney Foundation of Louisiana Inc

The national kidney foundation of louisiana, inc. is the major statewide voluntary non-profit organization dedicated to preventing kidney disease, improving the health and well-being of individuals affected by the disease and increasing…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kidney Foundation of Ohio Inc and the most unlike its peers is Eliza Bryant Village. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY DIALYSIS CENTER — $13,785,181 · HealthCOMMUNITY DIALYSIS CENTERUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $2,580,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INCKIDNEY FOUNDATION OF OHIO INC — $658,305 · Health+7 more — $820,814 · HealthAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC — $408,000 · OtherTHE KIDNEY CARE COUNCIL INC — $137,500 · Community ImprovementASSOCIATION OF INDIAN PHYSICIANS OF NORTHERN OHIO — $100,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $28,074 · EducationELIZA BRYANT VILLAGE — $30,000 · Human Services
Health$17,844,300Other$408,000Community Improvement$137,500Education$128,074Human Services$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY DIALYSIS CENTER — $13,785,181 over 8y, 15% of budgetUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $2,580,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKIDNEY FOUNDATION OF OHIO INC — $658,305 over 8y, 14% of budgetMINORITY ORGAN AND TISSUE TRANSPLANT EDUCATION PROGRAM OF CLEVELAND INC — $562,648 over 8y, 69% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC — $408,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KIDNEY CARE COUNCIL INC — $137,500 over 3y, 10% of budgetASSOCIATION OF INDIAN PHYSICIANS OF NORTHERN OHIO — $100,000 over 4y, 7.9% of budgetNONPROFIT KIDNEY CARE ALLIANCE — $69,900 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc — $68,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKIDNEY CARE PARTNERS INC CO FEDERAL HEALTH POLICY STRATEGIES — $45,480 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $35,336 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $33,650 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetELIZA BRYANT VILLAGE — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $28,074 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Centers for Dialysis Care Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph