Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leonard and Judith Schwartzbaum Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$233k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$205k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$503kHuman Services$269kPhilanthropy$71kFood & Nutrition$39kHousing & Shelter$39kYouth Development$28kEducation$9kCivil Rights$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $205k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Safe Children Coalition$205,000
Louis and Gloria Flanzer Philanthro$11,000
Healthcare For The Homeless$5,000
San Francisco Marin Food Bank$5,000
Boys Girls Club Sarasota$2,000
Turning Point York PA$1,500
Creative York$1,000
York County Libraries$1,000
CC Of York Foundation$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $255k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Safe Children Coalition: $205k → 9%Safe Children Coalition: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$939k · 15 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
8

Total granted

$939k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

40%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $255k · revenue +3%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +74%
  • HC
    HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • LG
    Louis Gloria Flanzer Phil Trust
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue 0%
  • FB
    FLANZER BOYS GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chester County Food Bank

We mobilize and educate our community to ensure equitable access to nutritious and familiar food. we do this by raising, and soliciting funds for the acquisition, storage, growing, collection and distribution of food to low income citizens…

Food & Nutrition
2
Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank

Our mission is to leverage the power of community to achieve lasting solutions to hunger and its root causes.

Food & Nutrition
3
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
4
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
5
Jobsfirstnyc

Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.

Youth Development
6
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
7
Harvest Hope Food Bank

Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…

Food & Nutrition
8
York County Council On Aging Inc

York county council on aging's (yccoa) mission is to serve as a focal point for the provision and coordination of a broad range of services and activities for senior adults in york and chester counties, sc. we strive to improve health and…

Human Services
9
Food in Need of Distribution Inc

Food in need of distribution, inc. (find food bank) is dedicated to relieving hunger, the causes of hunger, and the problems associated with hunger through awareness, education, and mobilization of resources and community involvement.

Food & Nutrition
10
Westmoreland County Food Bank Inc

Our mission is to enable our neighbors westmoreland county residents who are hungry or at risk of hunger to have ready access to food.

Food & Nutrition
11
Community Action Council of Howard County Maryland Inc

The community action council of howard county (cac) seeks to diminish poverty and enable self-sufficiency for all howard county individuals, families, and children in need through housing assistance, food assistance, energy assistance,…

—
12
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is York County Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is York County Library System. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Bay Park Conservatory: $500,000 · OtherThe Bay Park ConservatorySAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $32,900 · OtherHEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $32,900 · OtherLouis and Gloria Flanzer Philanthro: $27,263 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 · OtherBoys Girls Club Sarasota: $25,300 · Other+14 more: $41,150 · Other+14 moreSAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC: $255,000 · Human ServicesSAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC+1 more: $5,500 · Human ServicesGULF COAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,800 · PhilanthropyTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $600 · PhilanthropyYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $6,900 · EducationALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $3,500 · Food & NutritionCREATIVE YORK: $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$685,513Human Services$260,500Philanthropy$11,400Education$6,900Food & Nutrition$3,500Arts & Culture$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC: $255,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $32,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $32,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGULF COAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $6,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE OF HOPE INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREATIVE YORK: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYORK COUNTY FOOD BANK: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds GULF COAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE YORK ↗
  • Who funds YORK COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds YORK COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leonard and Judith Schwartzbaum Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leonard and Judith Schwartzbaum Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Health Care for the Homeless Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The United Way of Central Maryland Inc: 2% of income from government
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Safe Children Coalition Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Leonard and Judith Schwartzbaum Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Leonard and Judith Schwartzbaum Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leonard and Judith Schwartzbaum Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph