Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leon and Symma Miller Memorial Trust

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2020
14
Grants FY2020
4
States reached
$2k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Leon and Symma Miller Memorial Trust’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Jewish Communal Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Leon and Symma Miller Memorial Trust named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $10k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’17
1
’18
1
’19
9
’20
3
’21
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$218kInternational$34kReligion$15kHealth$4kEducation$500Human Services$500
02FY2020 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF ISREALI DEFENSE FORCES$1,500
CHABAD'S CHILDREN OF CHERNOBYL$1,000
THANC FOUNDATION$1,000
NATIONAL PARKINSON FOUNDATION INC$1,000
MELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$1,000
YOUNG ISRAEL OF GREAT NECK$1,000
DOROT INC$500
TEMPLE ISRAEL OF GREAT NECK$500
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CEN$500
YALE UNIVERSITY$500
CONG BETH MEDROSH OF MONSEY$500
CHABAD OF BROOKVILLE INC$440
YESHIVAS KARLIN STOLIN$360
YESHIVA TORAH VODAATH$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DOROT INC: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
2
University of Judaism Foundation
—
3
Zichron Chaim Meir Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Dorot Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy
7
The Zachary & Elizabeth M Fisher Center for Alzheimer's Research Foundation

The zachary and elizabeth m. fisher center for alzheimer's research foundation is dedicated to attacking the scourge of alzheimer's disease through a 3-pronged assault focused on understanding the cause of alzheimer's disease (ad),…

Health
8
Chaim Maleh Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

—
11
Mesorah Heritage Foundation

The foundation's mission is to research, locate, translate, and create jewish religious, literary, biblical, and talmudic works for religious, scholarly and cultural purposes for the general public.

Arts & Culture
12
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Communal Fund; the most unlike its peers is National Parkinson Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $217,807 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUNDAMIT CHILDREN INC: $32,591 · InternationalAMIT CHILDREN …+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalAM YISRAEL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · ReligionFRIENDS OF ISREALI DEFENSE FORCES: $1,500 · OtherMELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 · OtherNATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAEL: $1,000 · OtherNATIONAL PARKINSON FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY: $500 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL OF GREAT NECK: $500 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CEN: $500 · OtherCONG BETH MEDROSH OF MONSEY: $500 · OtherCHABAD OF BROOKVILLE INC: $440 · OtherYESHIVATH TORAH VODAATH: $400 · OtherYESHIVAS KARLIN STOLIN: $360 · OtherTHE THANC FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthDOROT INC: $500 · Human Services
Philanthropy$217,807International$33,591Religion$10,000Other$7,700Health$1,000Human Services$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $217,807 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMIT CHILDREN INC: $32,591 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAM YISRAEL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHABAD'S CHILDREN OF CHERNOBYL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE THANC FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOROT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMIT CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds AM YISRAEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD'S CHILDREN OF CHERNOBYL ↗
  • Who funds MELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE THANC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DOROT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY14.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leon and Symma Miller Memorial Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leon and Symma Miller Memorial Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Leon and Symma Miller Memorial Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Leon and Symma Miller Memorial Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leon and Symma Miller Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph