Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leo M Bernstein Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$505k
Granted FY2022
58
Grants FY2022
12
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Arts & Culture$806kEducation$281kReligion$267kHuman Services$265kPhilanthropy$234kPublic Benefit$130kInternational$120kSocial Science$98kOther$0
02FY2022 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k35 grants · $115k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $341k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$6,075
Median grant
12
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Kennedy Center$50,000
World Central Kitchen$30,000
National Constitution Center$25,000
Leo Bernstein Hebrew Academy$25,000
Hirshorn Museum$20,000
American Committee For The Weizmann Institute Of S$20,000
GOODProjects$20,000
Opendor Media$20,000
Anti-Defamation League$15,000
American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee$15,000
Washington Hebrew Congregation$15,000
Doctors Without Borders USA Inc$15,000
Atlas Performing Arts Center$13,049
The Brigid Alliance$12,500
Medstar Georgetown University Hospital$12,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Health in the Hood Inc: $5k → 15%4 Paws for Ability: $1k → 9%4 Paws for Ability: $500 → 9%4 Paws for Ability: $500 → 9%Respect Ability: $1k → 8%Sasha Bruce Youthwork Inc: $6k → 14%Sasha Bruce Youthwork Inc: $5k → 14%The Brigid Alliance: $13k → 17%The Brigid Alliance: $11k → 17%Building Bridges: $2k → 14%Building Bridges: $1k → 14%NARAL Pro-Choice America: $11k → 14%American National Red Cross: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
VA
MD
DE
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 64 repeat orgs$506k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

64 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2022, 35 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

64
64

Total granted

$2.1M
$348k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+31%

Still filing today

66%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $159k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER
    5× · 2017–2022 · $175k · revenue +173%
  • SI
    SIXTH & I SYNAGOGUE INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $101k · revenue +26%
  • KV
    KOLLEL VILNA
    6× · 2017–2022 · $78k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • WW
    WHEN WE ALL VOTE
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue 0%
  • SF
    S&R Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • NG
    National Gallery of Artgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
5
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education
8
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
9
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
10
The National Bureau of Asian Research

Nbr conducts advanced independent research on strategic, political, economic, energy, globalization, and health issues affecting u.s. relations with asia. drawing upon an extensive network of the world's leading specialists and leveraging…

—
11
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
12
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Nature Sacred. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

99 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 99 of the 161 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
26
Early backer (in before they grew)
97/99
Grantees still filing
77/99
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Kennedy Center: $165,000 · OtherKennedy CenterLeo Bernstein Hebrew Academy: $150,000 · OtherLeo Bernstein Hebrew AcademyWASHINGTON HEBREW CONGREGATION: $87,500 · OtherWASHINGTON HEBREW CONGREGATIONAmerican Committee For The Weizmann Institute Of S: $85,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $76,800 · OtherCity Dance: $62,000 · OtherHalycon: $61,000 · Other+98 more: $939,473 · Other+98 moreNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER: $175,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL CONS…TRUST FOR THE NATIONAL MALL: $50,000 · Arts & CultureTRUST FOR THE…Lillian and Albert Small Capital Jewish Museum: $15,000 · Arts & CultureNational Gallery of Art: $15,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL ARCHIVES FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureATLAS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $13,049 · Arts & Culture+13 more: $34,000 · Arts & Culture+13 moreKOLLEL VILNA: $77,500 · PhilanthropyKOLLEL VI…GOOD PROJECTS INC: $42,000 · PhilanthropyGOOD PROJ…GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $28,500 · PhilanthropyGREATER W…THE GIVING BACK FUND: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GIVIN…JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $17,900 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FU…NATURE SACRED: $15,000 · PhilanthropyNATURE SA…HOPEWELL FUND: $12,000 · Philanthropy+6 more: $16,500 · Philanthropy+6 moreSIXTH & I SYNAGOGUE INC: $101,000 · ReligionOPENDOR MEDIA INC: $35,000 · ReligionMESORAH INC: $25,000 · Religion+1 more: $4,399 · ReligionMERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER: $70,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $30,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $15,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $15,000 · InternationalWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $10,000 · InternationalGIVE2ASIA: $6,250 · InternationalDEMOCRACY WORKS INC: $55,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $46,250 · Civil RightsHUMAN RIGHTS FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · Civil Rights+1 more: $2,000 · Civil RightsYESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $64,000 · EducationICIVICS INC: $12,500 · EducationTHE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC: $7,500 · EducationAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationCivic Nation: $4,500 · Education+5 more: $9,000 · Education
Other$1,626,773Arts & Culture$317,049Philanthropy$229,400Religion$165,399International$146,250Civil Rights$110,750Education$102,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER: $175,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSIXTH & I SYNAGOGUE INC: $101,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetKOLLEL VILNA: $77,500 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $76,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER: $70,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $64,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDEMOCRACY WORKS INC: $55,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTRUST FOR THE NATIONAL MALL: $50,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $46,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGOOD PROJECTS INC: $42,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetGeorgetown Heritage: $37,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetOPENDOR MEDIA INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $32,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MEDSTAR-GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER INC: $32,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWHEN WE ALL VOTE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELCOMING AMERICA INC: $29,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $28,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMESORAH INC: $25,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetNEW DANCE ALLIANCE INC: $25,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetHEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $23,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE GIVING BACK FUND: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $17,900 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWE WANT THE LAND COALITION INC: $16,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLillian and Albert Small Capital Jewish Museum: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNational Gallery of Art: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARCHIVES FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATURE SACRED: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetATLAS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $13,049 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetICIVICS INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOWEN MCCAULEY DANCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetLUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Invest Partners Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPENSECRETS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ELLINGTON FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAM: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SIXTH & I SYNAGOGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds KOLLEL VILNA ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds MERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds DEMOCRACY WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUST FOR THE NATIONAL MALL ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Georgetown Heritage ↗
  • Who funds OPENDOR MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MEDSTAR-GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEN WE ALL VOTE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds WELCOMING AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MESORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW DANCE ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GIVING BACK FUND ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds WE WANT THE LAND COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC35.6× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Duber Family Foundation · The Scott and Patrice Brickman Family Foundation · The Carl M Freeman Foundation Inc · Sachiko Kuno Foundation Inc · Galena-Yorktown Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · S & R Foundation · Sami & Annie Totah Family Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leo M Bernstein Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leo M Bernstein Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Joshua M Freeman Foundation: 20% of income from government
  • Icivics Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Upstream Usa Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Health in the Hood Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Yeshiva of Greater Washington Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Hebrew Home of Greater Washington Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Leo M Bernstein Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Leo M Bernstein Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 161 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leo M Bernstein Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph