Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leo H Bendit Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$721k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.5MInternational$173kHousing & Shelter$158kCivil Rights$116kHuman Services$96kArts & Culture$71kEducation$62kPublic Safety & Disaster$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $61k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$4,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$500,000
MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL$80,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADO$18,000
PINE STREET INN$18,000
CAMERA$15,000
ROSIE'S PLACE$10,000
USHER 1F COLLABORATIVE 228$9,000
PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND$8,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOC$8,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MA$8,000
SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICES$7,000
PALLIATIVE CARE SVC FUND - MGH$5,000
BOSTON AREA GLEANERS$4,000
CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION$4,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS OF MA$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $8k → 17%SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $8k → 17%SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $8k → 17%SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $8k → 17%SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $7k → 17%SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6k → 17%SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6k → 17%SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 17%PINE STREET INN: $18k → 16%SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4k → 17%PINE STREET INN: $18k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $11k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $11k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $7k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $5k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $5k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NV
PA
CA
VA
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 34 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
13

Total granted

$2.4M
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
-13%

Still filing today

56%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    6× · 2018–2025 · $510k · revenue +123%
  • CF
    COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $122k · revenue +85%
  • PINE STREET INN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +123%

Funded once

  • Care Dimensions Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
  • FJ
    FALMOUTH JEWISH CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • EH
    EDWARD HADDEN OPEN HEARTS CAMP
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
4
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
7
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
9
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
20/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $620,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL HOSPITALCJP: $176,472 · OtherCJPAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVIS ADA: $81,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVIS ADAUSHER 1F COLLABORATIVE 228: $60,000 · OtherPALLIATIVE CARE SVC FUND - MGH: $47,000 · Other+24 more: $241,200 · Other+24 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $510,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncAmerican Heart Association Inc: $90,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncPLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $68,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSA…CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY: $32,500 · HealthRheumatology Research Foundation: $25,000 · Health+3 more: $14,000 · HealthCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $122,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $48,000 · International+2 more: $2,000 · InternationalPINE STREET INN INC: $90,000 · Human ServicesSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesROSIE'S PLACE INC: $67,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterPERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $60,000 · Education+1 more: $1,500 · EducationBOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC: $20,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,225,672Health$739,500International$172,000Human Services$150,000Housing & Shelter$68,000Education$61,500Food & Nutrition$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $510,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $122,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $68,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $67,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $60,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $60,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $48,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $36,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY: $32,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRheumatology Research Foundation: $25,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC: $20,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMIRACLE FLIGHTS: $11,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFALMOUTH SERVICE CENTER INC: $7,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $7,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCare Dimensions Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARROLL CENTER FOR THE BLIND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM MAUREEN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetOYSTER POND ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST INC: $1,600 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELONGING TO EACH OTHER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds Rheumatology Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE FLIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds FALMOUTH SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Care Dimensions Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARROLL CENTER FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM MAUREEN INC ↗
  • Who funds OYSTER POND ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leo H Bendit Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leo H Bendit Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Boston Area Gleaners Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Care Dimensions Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Perkins School for the Blind: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Carroll Center for the Blind Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leo H Bendit’s filings →

More from the funding graph