Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lenore Cletcher-Wessale Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$657k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$5,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
A PETTRY CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST$11,500
R VANAUSDOLL CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST$5,750
S MOSS CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST$5,750
M PHILLIPS CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST$5,750
J MOONEY CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST$5,750
J KIBLER CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST$5,750
J FORD CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST$5,750
M BOYER CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST$5,750
E POWELL CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST$5,750
M STAHLER CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST$5,750
R BOYER CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST$5,500
S KREMITZKI CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST$2,800
B STAHLER CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST$2,800
E KNOFSKY CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST$2,800
K CLODFELDER CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST$2,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 14%Indiana State University: $10k → 19%ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $7k → 11%SIU Edwardsville: $5k → 12%Augustana College: $5k → 15%Millikin University: $5k → 15%Lakeview College of Nursing: $5k → 17%University of Illinois: $20k → 19%SIU Carbondale: $5k → 23%Murray State University: $8k → 19%SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 14%Indiana State University: $8k → 19%ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%Augustana College: $5k → 15%University of Illinois: $15k → 19%Murray State University: $7k → 19%SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 14%Indiana State University: $7k → 19%University of Illinois: $14k → 19%Murray State University: $5k → 19%Indiana State University: $7k → 19%University of Illinois: $14k → 19%Murray State University: $5k → 19%Indiana State University: $7k → 19%Illinois State University: $5k → 11%University of Illinois: $6k → 19%Murray State University: $5k → 19%A PETTRY CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST: $12k → 15%Eastern Illinois University: $14k → 18%University of Illinois: $5k → 19%S MOSS CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST: $6k → 15%Eastern Illinois University: $14k → 18%Parkland College: $16k → 19%M STAHLER CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST: $6k → 15%Eastern Illinois University: $8k → 18%Parkland College: $15k → 19%J MOONEY CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST: $6k → 15%Eastern Illinois University: $6k → 18%Parkland College: $9k → 19%J KIBLER CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST: $6k → 15%Eastern Illinois University: $6k → 18%Parkland College: $5k → 19%M PHILLIPS CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST: $6k → 15%E POWELL CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST: $6k → 15%J FORD CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST: $6k → 15%M BOYER CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST: $6k → 15%R VANAUSDOLL CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST: $6k → 15%R BOYER CO LENORE CLETCHER-WESSALE TRUST: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
IN
CA
UT
MO
KY
AZ
KS
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$536k · 21 repeat orgs$121k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +5% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
10

Total granted

$536k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+4%

Still filing today

24%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IW
    ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2019–2023 · $22k · revenue +5%
  • AC
    AUGUSTANA COLLEGE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +27%
  • MU
    Midwestern University
    2× · 2022–2024 · $7k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS-URBANA CHAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2024 · $17k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • NI
    NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lincoln University

Lincoln college uniquely empowers students to realize their full potential.

Education
2
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
3
Ashland University

Institution of higher education

Education
4
Augustana University Association

A four-year liberal arts university affiliated with the evangelical lutheran church.

Education
5
Lake Forest College

Lake Forest College is a National Residential Liberal Arts College, accredited by the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools.

Education
6
Morningside University

Morningside university is a 4 year private university, that provides a liberal arts education to full and part-time students, including co-curricular activities (residence halls, dining, bookstore).

Education
7
Hilbert College

Hilbert college is an independent institution of higher learning that embraces its catholic franciscan heritage and values. students from diverse backgrounds are educated in liberal arts and professional programs to become informed…

Education
8
Linfield University

Linfield university is an undergraduate and graduate university recognized for its strong teaching faculty, outstanding science programs and distinctive international emphasis.

Education
9
Limestone University

Limestone university is a four-year, liberal arts institution in gaffney, sc. established in 1845, limestone offers masters, bachelor and associate degrees through traditional and non-traditional educational opportunities.

Education
10
Simpson College

A residential, coeducation, undergraduate liberal arts college.

Education
11
Carleton College

To provide an exceptional undergraduate liberal arts education.

Education
12
Concordia University Chicago

Liberal arts christian university for all who seek to develop their full potential.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois Wesleyan University; the most unlike its peers is Lakeview College of Nursing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY: $87,275 · OtherEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITYUniversity of Illinois: $87,175 · OtherUniversity of IllinoisPARKLAND COLLEGE: $80,253 · OtherPARKLAND COLLEGEIndiana State University: $40,650 · OtherIndiana State UniversityMurray State University: $35,450 · OtherMurray State UniversitySOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $26,300 · Other+33 more: $229,900 · Other+33 moreILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $22,350 · EducationILLINOIS WES…MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY: $18,150 · EducationMILLIKIN UNI…AUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationAUGUSTANA CO…LAKEVIEW COLLEGE OF NURSING: $7,150 · EducationLAKEVIEW COL…Midwestern University: $6,650 · EducationMidwestern U…CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $3,500 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · Education
Other$587,003Education$69,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $22,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILLIKIN UNIVERSITY: $18,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLAKEVIEW COLLEGE OF NURSING: $7,150 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMidwestern University: $6,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTANA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LAKEVIEW COLLEGE OF NURSING ↗
  • Who funds Midwestern University ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lenore Cletcher-Wessale Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lenore Cletcher-Wessale Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lenore Cletcher-Wessale’s filings →

    More from the funding graph