Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lemay Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$233k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$574kEducation$367kInternational$327kHealth$150kHuman Services$97kRecreation & Sports$80kYouth Development$60kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $211k
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIVER CHRISTIAN CHURCH$45,000
AGLOW INTERNATIONAL$24,000
REAL CHOICES WOMENS CENTER$21,500
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA FOUNDATION$20,000
SHIELD OF FAITH MISSIONS$20,000
STREAMS IN THE DESERT INTERNATIONAL$20,000
DAD-E ACADEMY$20,000
LUIS PALAU ASSOCIATION$10,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$10,000
DESTINY CENTER$10,000
ISRAEL HEALING INITIATIVE$10,000
FOR HIS GLORY MINISTRIES$9,600
PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY$8,000
PRAGER UNIERSITY FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KING'S ROW COMMUNITY LIFE CENTER: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 92% of Lemay Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 61% of the giving stays in NV; by stated purpose, 8%.

Lemay Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 14 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$1.6M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+249%

Still filing today

43%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Nevada Reno Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $155k · revenue +35%
  • PC
    Pregnancy Counseling Center Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $140k · revenue +68%
  • SI
    Streams in the Desert International Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • KR
    KINGS ROW COMMUNITY LIFE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +249%
  • NH
    NEVADA HOUSE OF PRAYER
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
2
Project New Hope International

Publicly supported evangelical organization focused on community transformation and empowerment of impoverished neighborhoods in South America and around the world. Missionaries work with community leaders assisting them in various mission…

—
3
Partnership for Indigenous Peoples -Pipes - International

We are a global Christian organization committed to partnering with indigenous peoples, local churches, and community-based organizations to make disciples of Jesus Christ and help end extreme poverty. We serve indigenous pygmies,…

International
4
International Rescue Committee Inc

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.

International
5
Northwest Nazarene University Inc

The mission of northwest nazarene university (nnu) is the transformation of the whole person. centered in jesus christ, the nnu education instills habits of heart, soul, mind, and strength to enable each student to become god's creative…

Education
6
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
7
Prison Fellowship International

To transform the lives of prisoners, their families, and victims through a global network of ministry partners.

Crime & Legal
8
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
9
TEN9 Ministries

Proclaiming the gospel of Jesus Christ worldwide

Religion
10
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
11
El Pozo de Vida

Human trafficking rescue, restoration and rehabilitation of human trafficking victims.

Philanthropy
12
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eddy House; the most unlike its peers is Luis Palau Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE RIVER CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $315,000 · OtherTHE RIVER CHRISTIAN CHURCHAGLOW INTERNATIONAL: $207,000 · OtherAGLOW INTERNATIONALSHIELD OF FAITH MISSIONS: $185,000 · OtherSHIELD OF FAITH MISSIONSPregnancy Counseling Center Inc: $140,000 · OtherPregnancy Counseling Center IncStreams in the Desert International Inc: $120,000 · OtherStreams in the Desert International IncDAD-E ACADEMY: $95,000 · OtherDAD-E ACADEMYFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $80,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETESDESTINY CENTER: $60,000 · OtherFOR HIS GLORY MINISTRIES: $54,300 · Other+3 more: $41,500 · OtherUniversity of Nevada Reno Foundation: $155,000 · EducationUniversity of Neva…Pacific Lutheran University: $86,500 · EducationPacific Lutheran U…PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationPRAGER UNIVERSITY …EDDY HOUSE: $60,000 · Human ServicesKINGS ROW COMMUNITY LIFE CENTER: $15,000 · Human ServicesLuis Palau Association: $10,000 · ReligionIsrael Healing Initiative: $10,000 · Health
Other$1,297,800Education$271,500Human Services$75,000Religion$10,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Nevada Reno Foundation: $155,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPregnancy Counseling Center Inc: $140,000 over 7y, 7.1% of budgetStreams in the Desert International Inc: $120,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetPacific Lutheran University: $86,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEDDY HOUSE: $60,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKINGS ROW COMMUNITY LIFE CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetLuis Palau Association: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIsrael Healing Initiative: $10,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Nevada Reno Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Pregnancy Counseling Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Streams in the Desert International Inc ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Lutheran University ↗
  • Who funds EDDY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KINGS ROW COMMUNITY LIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Luis Palau Association ↗
  • Who funds Israel Healing Initiative ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lemay Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lemay Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lemay Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph