· Public charity
Lehigh University
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 48 grants below total $8,926,989 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $186,791,238 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $177,864,249 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $446k
- $50k–250k15 grants · $1.7M
- $250k+12 grants · $6.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY | $1,198,295 |
| OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY | $1,192,148 |
| UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA | $1,089,138 |
| GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORP | $553,834 |
| BETHLEHEM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP | $430,000 |
| TEACHERS COLLEGE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $363,350 |
| CORNELL UNIVERSITY | $349,742 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA | $346,680 |
| LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY | $332,329 |
| UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO | $309,291 |
| TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY | $308,325 |
| HARVARD UNIVERSITY | $261,920 |
| DREXEL UNIVERSITY | $245,656 |
| UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS | $175,929 |
| FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY | $151,058 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $815k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
69 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $203k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CMCarnegie Mellon University9× · 2017–2025 · $9.4M · revenue +15%
- BEBETHLEHEM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION9× · 2017–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +6% · 56% of their budget
Cornell University6× · 2020–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +46%
Funded once
- CACOMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $105k · revenue +125%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF TEXASone grant, 2020 · $101k
- SISTOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCHgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $63k · revenue +149%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.
We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.
As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…
Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…
Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
Education and Research
The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University and the most unlike its peers is Stowers Institute for Medical Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 61 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
- Who funds BETHLEHEM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Teachers College Columbia University ↗
- Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
- Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC CENTER LEHIGH VALLEY ↗
- Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE OF BORDER COLLABORATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds Harvey Mudd College ↗
- Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Luke's Hospital of Bethlehem Pa · Ppl Foundation · Air Products Foundation · United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · Washington University · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Folds of Honor Foundation · Martin Guitar Charitable Foundation · John a and Margaret Post Foundation · Northwestern University · Tulsa Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lehigh University funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oregon Research Institute — 100% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- University of Delaware — 30% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.