Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Legal Services of New Jersey Inc

To provide and promote free and affordable civil legal assistance, advocacy and justice for low-income people and communities in new jersey.

$57M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$18M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Crime & Legal$287MHuman Services$47k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $250k+9 grants · $57M
$4,433,356
Median grant
1
States reached
$90M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTH JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES$18,205,523
NORTHEAST NEW JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES$13,409,726
CENTRAL JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES$10,141,759
ESSEX-NEWARK LEGAL SERVICES$5,127,942
LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHWEST JERSEY$4,433,356
AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE$3,840,448
RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY$1,062,646
SETON HALL$934,876
COMMUNITY HEALTH LAW PROJECT$335,798
ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY$6,460
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $7k → 16%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $7k → 16%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $7k → 16%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $7k → 16%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $6k → 16%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $4k → 16%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $4k → 16%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $4k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$287M · 10 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
0

Total granted

$287M
$0

Still filing today

80%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Crime & LegalHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    SOUTH JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $90M · revenue +122% · 91% of their budget
  • NN
    NORTHEAST NEW JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $67M · revenue +27% · 92% of their budget
  • CJ
    CENTRAL JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $50M · revenue +137% · 78% of their budget

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Legal Services of New Jersey Inc

    To provide and promote free and affordable civil legal assistance, advocacy and justice for low-income people and communities in new jersey.

    Crime & Legal
    2
    Volunteer Lawyers for Justice in

    Volunteer Lawyers for Justice, Inc. ("VLJ"/ the Organization), a non-profit organization incorporated in the State of New Jersey, is a comprehensive, statewide legal services program based in Newark. VLJ's mission is to ensure access to…

    Crime & Legal
    3
    Eastern Environmental Law Center Inc

    Legal assistance to nonprofit organizations working to solve environmental problems that threaten the people, natural resources and communities in the new jersey and tri-state region.

    Environment
    4
    Legal Services of Long Island

    To provide free legal assistance in non-criminal matters to persons meeting financial eligibility requirements or having other special needs.

    5
    Legal Services Nyc

    Legal services nyc is a non-profit organization that provides free civil legal assistance to low-income people in new york city. a community-based organization serving more than 100,000 people annually, lsnyc is the nation's largest…

    Crime & Legal
    6
    South Carolina Legal Services

    South carolina legal services is a statewide law firm that provides civil legal services to protect the rights and represent the interests of low income south carolinians.

    Crime & Legal
    7
    Volunteer Up Legal Clinic

    Volunteer up legal clinics mission is to uplift and empower communities of south jersey through legal representation, advocacy, and community awareness, with the vision that all communities of south jersey will have access to quality legal…

    Crime & Legal
    8
    Lsny-Bronx Corporation

    Legal services nyc-bronx is a not-for-profit corporation organized for the purposes of providing legal assistance to indigent persons in the new york city area in noncriminal proceedings or matters.

    Education
    9
    Brooklyn Legal Services Inc

    Brooklyn legal services, inc is a not-for-profit corporation organized for the purpose of providing legal assistance to indigent persons in the new york city area in noncriminal proceedings or matters.

    Crime & Legal
    10
    South Coastal Counties Legal Services Inc

    To achieve equal justice for the poor and disadvantaged through community based legal advocacy.

    Crime & Legal
    11
    Bergen County Bar Association Inc

    Furtherance of jurisprudence

    12
    League of Women Voters of New Jersey

    Through grassroots people-powered advocacy and organizing, lwvnj trains, mobilizes, and educates advocates to have a greater voice in government and influence public policy.

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Legal Services of Northwest Jersey Inc and the most unlike its peers is Seton Hall University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    5
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    8/8
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    SOUTH JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES INC — $90,199,807 · Crime & LegalSOUTH JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES INCNORTHEAST NEW JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION — $67,367,546 · Crime & LegalNORTHEAST NEW JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATIONCENTRAL JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES INC — $50,379,294 · Crime & LegalCENTRAL JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES INCESSEX-NEWARK LEGAL SERVICES PROJECT INC — $31,141,444 · OtherESSEX-NEWARK LEGAL SERVICES PR…LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHWEST JERSEY INC — $21,682,757 · OtherLEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHWEST JE…AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE — $15,492,871 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMI…SETON HALL UNIVERSITY — $4,442,275 · OtherSETON HALL UNIVERSITYRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY — $3,775,179 · OtherCOMMUNITY HEALTH LAW PROJECT INC — $2,241,966 · HealthADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY — $47,383 · Human Services
    Crime & Legal$207,946,647Other$76,534,526Health$2,241,966Human Services$47,383

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTH JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES INC — $90,199,807 over 8y, 91% of budgetNORTHEAST NEW JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION — $67,367,546 over 8y, 92% of budgetCENTRAL JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES INC — $50,379,294 over 8y, 78% of budgetESSEX-NEWARK LEGAL SERVICES PROJECT INC — $31,141,444 over 8y, 90% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHWEST JERSEY INC — $21,682,757 over 8y, 65% of budgetSETON HALL UNIVERSITY — $4,442,275 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH LAW PROJECT INC — $2,241,966 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY — $47,383 over 8y, 0.3% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds SOUTH JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES INC
    • Who funds NORTHEAST NEW JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
    • Who funds CENTRAL JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES INC
    • Who funds ESSEX-NEWARK LEGAL SERVICES PROJECT INC
    • Who funds LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHWEST JERSEY INC
    • Who funds SETON HALL UNIVERSITY
    • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH LAW PROJECT INC
    • Who funds ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Legal Services CorporationDC15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Legal Services Corporation · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Legal Services of New Jersey Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
    • Community Health Law Project Inc69% of income from government
    • Central Jersey Legal Services Inc3% of income from government
    • Legal Services of Northwest Jersey Inc3% of income from government
    • Northeast New Jersey Legal Services Corporation2% of income from government
    • Seton Hall University1% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    1rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph