Skip to content

· Public charity

Legacy Fund for Boston Inc

The legacy fund for boston is a public charity which supports the endurance of places and spaces that are meaningful to bostonians and the historic character of the entire city of boston.

$602k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $191k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $411k
$45,661
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHINESE CONSOLIDATED BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW ENGLAND$100,000
REVOLUTIONARY SPACES INC$97,265
SECOND CHURCH IN DORCHESTER CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE$64,000
BOSTON WOMEN'S HERITAGE TRAIL$50,000
VILNA SHUL BOSTON CENTER FOR JEWISH CULTURE INC$50,000
SHIRLEY-EUSTIS HOUSE ASSOCIATION$50,000
BEACON HILL FRIENDS HOUSE INC$45,661
FOOTLIGHT CLUB$30,000
ELIOT CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$30,000
UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST URBAN MINISTRY$25,000
CHARLESTOWN PRESERVATION SOCIETY$25,000
BOSTON PRESERVATION ALLIANCE INC$19,500
HYDE PARK HISTORICAL SOCIETY$16,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%CHINESE CONSOLIDATED BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW ENGLAND: $100k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Historic Boston Incorporated
—
2
New Bedford Preservation Society Inc

Historic preservation

—
3
Fitchburg Historical Society

Museum and research library for history of fitchburg, massachusetts

—
4
Boston Portuguese Festival

The purpose of the Boston Portuguese Festival is to promote the image of Portugal and the visibility of the Portuguese community and its ancestry in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to promote the education of the community regarding…

Arts & Culture
5
Bedford Historical Society

To preserve and share the unique history and traditions of the area.

—
6
Beverly Historical Society

Historic Beverly collects, preserves, and stewards Beverlys past and present to cultivate public support and appreciation for history; our vision is to share Beverly history with everyone.

—
7
The Gibson Society Inc

The mission of The Gibson House Museum is to serve as the primary resource for understanding and interpreting life in Bostons Back Bay. The museum accomplishes this by preserving the row house and its collections; exhibiting and…

—
8
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
9
The Seven and Eight Park Street Foundation Inc

Preservation of an historic boston landmark building.

Arts & Culture
10
West Stockbridge Historical Society

The mission of the west stockbridge historical society is to preserve the history and culture of west stockbridge, ma through research, programming, community involvment and the restoration of the old town hall.

Arts & Culture
11
Greater Boston Council On Alcoholism Inc
Philanthropy
12
Guild of Boston Artists Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Revolutionary Spaces Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Footlight Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REVOLUTIONARY SPACES INC: $97,265 · Arts & CultureREVOLUTIONARY SPACES INCBOSTON WOMENS HERITAGE TRAIL INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureBOSTON WOMENS HERITAGE TRAIL INCTHE SHIRLEY-EUSTIS HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SHIRLEY-EUSTIS HOUSE ASSOCIATIONTHE VILNA SHUL BOSTONS CENTER FOR JEWISH CULTURE INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE VILNA SHUL BOSTONS CENTER FOR JEWISH CULTURE INCTHE FOOTLIGHT CLUB: $30,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FOOTLIGHT CLUBSECOND CHURCH IN DORCHESTER CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE: $64,000 · OtherSECOND CHURCH IN DORCHEST…ELIOT CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF ROXBURY BOSTON MASSACHUSETTS: $30,000 · OtherELIOT CONGREGATIONAL CHUR…BENEVOLENT FRATERNITY OF UNITARIAN CHURCHES: $25,000 · OtherBENEVOLENT FRATERNITY OF …HYDE PARK HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $16,000 · OtherHYDE PARK HISTORICAL SOCI…CHINESE CONSOLIDATED BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW ENGLAND INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesCHINESE CONSOLIDAT…BEACON HILL FRIENDS HOUSE INC: $45,661 · ReligionCHARLESTOWN PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC: $25,000 · Public BenefitBOSTON PRESERVATION ALLIANCE INC: $19,500 · Education
Arts & Culture$277,265Other$135,000Human Services$100,000Religion$45,661Public Benefit$25,000Education$19,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOSTON WOMENS HERITAGE TRAIL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetTHE SHIRLEY-EUSTIS HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $50,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetBEACON HILL FRIENDS HOUSE INC: $45,661 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetTHE FOOTLIGHT CLUB: $30,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetBENEVOLENT FRATERNITY OF UNITARIAN CHURCHES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George B Henderson Foundation Jh5090MA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George B Henderson Foundation Jh5090 · Massachusetts Foundation for the Humanities & Public Policy Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Legacy Fund for Boston Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Legacy Fund for Boston Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Revolutionary Spaces Inc: 20% of income from government
  • The Shirley-Eustis House Association: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Legacy Fund for Boston Inc?

Find your warmest path to Legacy Fund for Boston Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Legacy Fund for Boston’s filings →

More from the funding graph