Skip to content
Leftovers Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Leftovers Inc

LEFTOVERS INC is a supporting organization for the contra costa crisis center located in walnut creek, ca.

$324k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$209k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$908kFood & Nutrition$160kHuman Services$81kEducation$50kPhilanthropy$30kHousing & Shelter$25k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $209k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$476k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTER$209,299
WE CARE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN$20,000
ROSSMOOR SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATI$20,000
FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA$20,000
MEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA$20,000
BAY AREA CRISIS NURSERY$10,000
MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER$10,000
TRINITY CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%ROSSMOOR FUND: $20k → 9%ROSSMOOR FUND: $10k → 9%TRINITY CENTER: $15k → 9%TRINITY CENTER: $10k → 9%WE CARE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 9%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $15k → 9%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $15k → 9%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 8 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$1.2M
$10k

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTER
    7× · 2017–2024 · $908k · revenue +228%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $85k · revenue +84%
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO
    3× · 2021–2024 · $65k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • FB
    Food Bank of Contra Costa& S
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Contra Costa County Meals On Wheels

Enable frail seniors to maintain their independence at home by providing them with high quality, nutritious meals that are cost effective, prepared in West Contra Costa County, delivered by caring drivers and administered by local…

Food & Nutrition
2
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
3
North County Community Food Bank

Emergency food services provided to families in need.

Food & Nutrition
4
Loaves and Fishes of Contra Costa

Since 1983, Loaves and Fishes has served over 5 million meals to many thousands of hungry people throughout Contra Costa County.

—
5
Richmond Emergency Food Pantry

The mission of the Richmond Emergency Food Pantry is to provide food to low-income residents of West Contra Costa County.

—
6
Redwood Coast Seniors Inc

Redwood Coast Seniors Inc. operates a senior center providing meals, transportation, day care, activities and support services that contribute to optimal wellness and healthy aging for all seniors on the Mendocino North Coast.

Human Services
7
Gold Country Community Services

Gold Country Senior Services, Inc provides essential programs that meet the basic needs of seniors living in Western Nevada County. GCSS ensures older adults have nutritional meals, warm homes, social interaction and a greater sense of…

Human Services
8
Care for the Children

Our mission is to provide homebound older adults with low income with nutritious food box delivery. Additionally, our food distribution program provides food to all in the communities we serve who need a helping hand. Our programs aim to…

—
9
South County Services Inc

The organization offers services that assist clients with food, clothing, and shelter, as well as transportation needs for medical and other needs. Written and oral interpretation aid is offered to clients. The other types of assistance…

Human Services
10
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Fresno

Respecting the presence of God among us, we serve, advocate for and empower those in need. In carrying out the social mission of the Roman Catholic Church in the Diocese of Fresno, the Organization provides food, clothing, housing support,…

Human Services
11
Crisis Support Services of Alameda County

24-Hours Crisis Lines and Crisis Counseling and Community Education Programs.

Health
12
North County Emergency Outreach Network

Provide food and assistance to individuals in need including food, crisis mgm., medical, housing and utility assistance and various needs on a case by case basis.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Monument Crisis Center; the most unlike its peers is Rossmoor Scholarship Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTER: $908,082 · HealthCONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTERMEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC: $85,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEE…FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $65,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF …MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $40,000 · Human ServicesMONUMENT C…Rossmoor Fund: $30,000 · Human ServicesRossmoor F…TRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK: $25,000 · Human ServicesTRINITY CE…We Care Services For Children: $20,000 · Human ServicesWe Care Se…Rossmoor Scholarship Foundation: $50,000 · EducationBAY AREA CRISIS NURSERY: $21,000 · OtherFood Bank of Contra Costa& S: $10,000 · Other
Health$908,082Food & Nutrition$150,000Human Services$115,000Education$50,000Other$31,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTER: $908,082 over 7y, 8.2% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC: $85,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRossmoor Scholarship Foundation: $50,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $40,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRossmoor Fund: $30,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetTRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK: $25,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBAY AREA CRISIS NURSERY: $21,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetWe Care Services For Children: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dean and Margaret Les…San Jose Mercury News…The Blackbaud Giving …The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Dean and Margaret Lesher FoundationCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leftovers Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leftovers Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leftovers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home