Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leen Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$103k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$315kArts & Culture$246kEducation$179kReligion$177kInternational$167kPhilanthropy$47kHealth$40kRecreation & Sports$39kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
$4,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$242k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$25,000
LILITH PUBLICATIONS INC$20,000
SUSTAINABLE PRINCETON INC$10,000
MIDDLE EAST FORUM$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
LAWRENCE HOPEWELL TRAIL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MEMRI (MID EAST REPORTING)$4,000
CAMP RAMAH$3,600
COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING AND ANALYSIS$3,000
GARDEN THEATRE$2,500
HETZ$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
SOURLAND CONSERVANCY$2,000
FRIENDS OF PRINCETON OPEN SPACE$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SECOND HARVEST: $2k → 11%BIRTHRIGHT: $2k → 15%PINELAND FOUNDATION: $4k → 19%ZAKA SEARCH AND RESCUE INC: $500 → 10%GATHER: $3k → 5%SECOND HARVEST: $2k → 11%SECOND HARVEST: $2k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 11%SEND HUNGER PACKING PRINCETON INC: $750 → 11%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
AZ
NM
TN
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 61 repeat orgs$411k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

61 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 50 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
91

Total granted

$1.2M
$377k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+11%

Still filing today

64%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    LILITH PUBLICATIONS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $179k · revenue +8%
  • SUSTAINABLE PRINCETON INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $144k · revenue +82%
  • OI
    ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD
    2× · 2022–2023 · $30k · revenue +234%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $33k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • BS
    BEIT SHAMESH
    one grant, 2019 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Israel 21c

Through its news service and public programs, Israel 21c educates individuals and groups about comtemporary life in Israel providing news and information on the people of Israel, its culture and business and scientific achievements.

Education
2
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
3
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
4
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
5
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
6
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
9
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
10
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
11
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
12
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humanity Forward Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ridgeview Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 159 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
84/88
Grantees still filing
57/88
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIEND OF THE IDF: $35,000 · OtherJEWISH CENTER: $33,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $33,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $32,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $32,500 · OtherONE FOR ISRAEL: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · Other+104 more: $495,676 · Other+104 moreSUSTAINABLE PRINCETON INC: $144,326 · EnvironmentSUSTAINABLE PRINCETO…Appalachian Mountain Club: $62,000 · EnvironmentAppalachian Mountain…Ridgeview Conservancy: $30,000 · EnvironmentRidgeview Conservanc…D&R GREENWAY LAND TRUST INC: $22,500 · EnvironmentD&R GREENWAY LAND TR…+9 more: $33,800 · Environment+9 moreLILITH PUBLICATIONS INC: $178,500 · Arts & CultureLILITH PUBLICATI…HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF PRINCETON: $20,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORICAL SOCIE…WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $12,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $9,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $13,750 · Arts & Culture+5 moreWebster University: $155,000 · EducationWebster Univ…HERITAGE RETREATS INC: $7,000 · Education+4 more: $9,280 · Education+4 moreMIDDLE EAST FORUM: $58,000 · InternationalMIDDLE EAS…ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $30,000 · InternationalONE ISRAEL…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $18,500 · InternationalWORLD CENT…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF REICHMAN UNIVERSITY INC: $10,000 · InternationalAMERICAN F…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $10,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF…FRIENDS OF ELNET: $10,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF…INVESTIGATIVE PROJECT ON TERRORISM FOUNDATION: $7,500 · International+6 more: $10,270 · International+6 moreLeadership Institute: $16,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $11,000 · Public BenefitJEWISH WAR VETERANS POST 112: $1,400 · Public BenefitUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $1,000 · Public BenefitGATHER INC: $11,500 · ReligionHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $8,000 · ReligionZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $5,000 · Religion
Other$711,676Environment$292,626Arts & Culture$233,250Education$171,280International$154,270Public Benefit$29,400Religion$24,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLILITH PUBLICATIONS INC: $178,500 over 8y, 6.4% of budgetWebster University: $155,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSUSTAINABLE PRINCETON INC: $144,326 over 8y, 23% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club: $62,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMIDDLE EAST FORUM: $58,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetRidgeview Conservancy: $30,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetD&R GREENWAY LAND TRUST INC: $22,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF PRINCETON: $20,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $18,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOULDER HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC: $14,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFREEDOM CENTER: $12,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetGATHER INC: $11,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHudson Institute Inc: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF REICHMAN UNIVERSITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ELNET: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WATERSHED COMMUNITY INSTITUTE: $9,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAWRENCE HOPEWELL TRAIL CORPORATION: $8,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetINVESTIGATIVE PROJECT ON TERRORISM FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHUMANITY FORWARD FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHERITAGE RETREATS INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSOURLAND CONSERVANCY: $6,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSecond Harvest: $6,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WATERSHED INSTITUTE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF PRINCETON OPEN SPACE: $5,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetISLES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARTS COUNCIL OF PRINCETON: $5,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOUTWARD BOUND INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN SPACE INSTITUTE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPINELAND FOUNDATION INC: $3,660 over 1y, 11% of budgetThe Pacifica Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOB PATH INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGush Etzion Foundation % Juliette Landesman: $2,550 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGather: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LILITH PUBLICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Webster University ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE PRINCETON INC ↗
  • Who funds Appalachian Mountain Club ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLE EAST FORUM ↗
  • Who funds ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD ↗
  • Who funds Ridgeview Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds D&R GREENWAY LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF PRINCETON ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds BOULDER HOSPICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CAMERA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GATHER INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Hudson Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF REICHMAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ELNET ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Princeton Area Community Foundation IncNJ25.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · George H and Estelle M Sands Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Wm Bryce Thompson Foundation · The Trustees of Princeton University · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Griffin-Cole Fund · The Milstein Family Foundation · Rita Allen Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leen Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leen Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Isles Inc: 21% of income from government
  • D&r Greenway Land Trust Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Arts Council of Princeton: 6% of income from government
  • The Watershed Institute Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Leen Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Leen Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 159 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leen’s filings →

More from the funding graph