· Private foundation
Wm Bryce Thompson Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GERARD'S HOUSE | $4,040 |
| FRIENDS OF PRINCETON OPEN SPACE | $4,040 |
| BIENNIAL OF THE AMERICAS | $2,500 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF M | $2,040 |
| STUDIO RT 29 | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,592 |
| Hibiscus Children Center | $1,250 |
| Redline Contemporary Art Center | $1,000 |
| D R GREENWAY LAND TRUST | $1,000 |
| MCCARTER THEATRE | $1,000 |
| PINK LADIES OF HUNTERDON COUNTY | $1,000 |
| FLORIDA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION | $615 |
| PRINCETON AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $540 |
| PIKE FOUNDATION | $525 |
| C-CHANGE CONVERSATIONS | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TBTHE BUDDY PROGRAM INC5× · 2018–2023 · $21k · revenue +52%
- SCSOURLAND CONSERVANCY5× · 2017–2021 · $19k · revenue +133%
- BABLAIR ACADEMY6× · 2018–2024 · $11k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- TDThe Denver Children's Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +27%
- CFCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +26%
- PAPRINCETON AREA COMMUNITY FUND INCone grant, 2020 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
To enrich the communities we serve through a multi-dimensional, world-class performing arts summer festival. We create programs that excite, inform, inspire, and invite discovery and engagement as we aspire to become a nationally…
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
Our fundamental mission is to bring scholarly ideas to the world. we publish books that connect authors and readers across spheres of knowledge to advance and enrich the human conversation. we embrace the highest standards in our…
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…
Glen foerd stewards an eclectic riverfront estate for the enjoyment and educational benefit of the community. drawing from the estate's architecture, art, material culture, and history-as well as its gardens and waterways-glen foerd…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Amwell Valley Hounds. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE BUDDY PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds SOURLAND CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds PRINCETON EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds BLAIR ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Foundation for a Better Puerto Rico Inc ↗
- Who funds HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF PRINCETON ↗
- Who funds THE HILL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF PRINCETON OPEN SPACE ↗
- Who funds The Denver Children's Foundation ↗
- Who funds GERARD'S HOUSE ↗
- Who funds C-CHANGE CONVERSATIONS ↗
- Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc ↗
- Who funds HOMEFRONT INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENVER BIENNIAL OF THE AMERICAS CORP ↗
- Who funds PRINCETON NURSERY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds SEND HUNGER PACKING PRINCETON ↗
- Who funds Princeton Symphony Orchestra Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF AMWELL VALLEY HOUNDS ↗
- Who funds HEADKNOWLES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds ASPEN ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
- Who funds TRENTON CHILDREN'S CHORUS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · George H and Estelle M Sands Foundation · Curtis W McGraw Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · The Burke Foundation Inc · The J Robert & Barbara A Hillier Foundation Inc · Tenacre Foundation · The Griffin-Cole Fund · The Frank J Ryan and Jane E Ryan Family Foundation · Leen Foundation Inc · The Trustees of Princeton University
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wm Bryce Thompson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Homefront Inc — 9% of income from government
- Arts Council of Princeton — 6% of income from government
- Princeton Symphony Orchestra Inc — 4% of income from government
- Princeton Nursery School — 4% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Blair Academy — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.