Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lee S Casty Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$31kYouth Development$28kHuman Services$8kPhilanthropy$4kHousing & Shelter$1k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$179k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL$20,000
BOCA RIO FOUNDATION$2,500
THE YELLOW RIBBON FUND$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Bulls Charities

Chicago Bulls charities is committed to community violence prevention through four focus areas; education, investment, health & wellness, and access to opportunities.

Philanthropy
2
Boca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc

Boca raton regional hospital foundation, inc. supports the hospital's mission of providing superior, compassionate health care through the cultivation and stewardship of philanthropic gifts and raising the public awareness of the hospital…

Community Improvement
3
The Madonna Foundation

The madonna foundation helps generous donors invest in extraordinary rehabilitation.

Philanthropy
4
Nicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation

To provide access to world-class health care for all children and support innovative programs focused on diagnosis, treatment and prevention of childhood illness.

Philanthropy
5
Children's Healthcare Charity Inc

Provide charitable support for activities that enhance children's health, growth, and well-being through medical, educational, and social programs.

Philanthropy
6
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
7
Palm Healthcare Foundation Inc

Palm Health Foundation invests in bold, community-led solutions that improve health and well-being in Palm Beach County. (Continued on Schedule O)Established in 2001 from the sale of Good Samaritan and St. Mary's hospitals, the Foundation…

Health
8
The South Florida Charity Classic
Human Services
9
Mcr Health Foundation Inc

Funds were raised to assist families in need, wihthin our local communirty in trime of an emergency. The Foundation also assists in raising community awareness via public media on a variety of issues including healthcare.

Health
10
Pinkball Inc

PINKBALL is an organization founded by "baseball moms" who were moved to create a fund for screening and diagnostic mammograms and breast ultrasounds for women in our community who are uninsured or under insured who may not qualify for…

Health
11
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
12
Brca Foundation

The primary mission is to accelerate research and foster collaboration to prevent and cure brca cancers. we invest in the most promising work of top scientific investigators while creating a forum for successful partnerships across…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boca Raton Champions Golf Charities Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Michelle McGann Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC — $27,659 · EducationAFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INCBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc — $20,000 · HealthBoca Raton Regional Hospital IncBOCA RATON CHAMPIONS GOLF CHARITIES INC — $7,500 · HealthBOCA RATON CHAMPIONS GOLF CHARITIES INCBOCA RIO FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 · PhilanthropyBOCA RIO FO…YELLOW RIBBON FUND INC — $2,493 · PhilanthropyYELLOW RIBB…The Michelle McGann Fund Inc — $2,000 · PhilanthropyThe Michell…MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES INC — $5,534 · Human ServicesTHE YELLOW RIBBON FUND — $1,500 · OtherCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS — $1,283 · Housing & ShelterPLAY FOR PINK INC — $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Education$27,659Health$27,500Philanthropy$6,993Human Services$5,534Other$1,500Housing & Shelter$1,283Crime & Legal$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC — $27,659 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOCA RATON CHAMPIONS GOLF CHARITIES INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES INC — $5,534 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOCA RIO FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYELLOW RIBBON FUND INC — $2,493 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Michelle McGann Fund Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS — $1,283 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lee S Casty Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Yellow Ribbon Fund Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph