Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lee Griffin Scholarship Fund

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$129k
Granted FY2026still arriving
18
Grants FY2026still arriving
6
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$531kRecreation & Sports$94k
02FY2026 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k13 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $89k
$4,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$685k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - LA CROSSE$31,550
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - PLATTEVILLE$18,500
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE$15,250
SOUTHWEST WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE$13,500
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MILWAUKEE$10,000
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY$9,700
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON$6,300
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - STEVENS POINT$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH$4,000
ST NORBERT COLLEGE$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI$2,000
WESTERN WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE$2,000
WINONA STATE UNIVERSITY$1,800
UNIVERSITY OF DUBUQUE$1,700
ROCHESTER COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE$1,550
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 15%LORAS COLLEGE: $5k → 11%IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER FALLS: $3k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - STEVENS POINT: $5k → 10%UNIV OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER: $4k → 10%BELOIT COLLEGE: $6k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH: $6k → 11%UNIV WISCONSIN EAU: $19k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LACROSSE: $32k → 12%KICKAPOO HIGH SCHOOL: $80k → 12%SOUTHWEST WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $14k → 13%UNIV OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE: $10k → 17%SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 13%LORAS COLLEGE: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER FALLS: $3k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OF STEVENS POINT: $5k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON: $56k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH: $4k → 11%UNIV WISCONSIN EAU: $15k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - LA CROSSE: $32k → 12%KICKAPOO HIGH SCHOOL: $70k → 12%SOUTHWEST WISCONSIN TECH COLLEGE: $12k → 13%UNIV OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE: $10k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON: $17k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH: $4k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE: $15k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LACROSSE: $26k → 12%SOUTHWEST WISCONSIN TECH COLLEGE: $12k → 13%UNIV OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE: $10k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON: $11k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH: $4k → 11%UNIV WISCONSIN EAU: $5k → 12%WESTERN TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $13k → 12%SOUTHWEST WISCONSIN TECH COLLEGE: $12k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MILWAUKEE: $10k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON: $11k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LACROSSE: $10k → 12%SOUTHWEST WISCONSIN TECH COLLEGE: $6k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $6k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LACROSSE: $10k → 12%UNIV OF WISCONSIN PLATTEVILLE: $25k → 13%WESTERN TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $7k → 12%UNIV OF WISCONSIN PLATTEVILLE: $21k → 13%VITERBO UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - PLATTEVILLE: $19k → 13%WESTERN TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $4k → 12%UNIV OF WISCONSIN PLATTEVILLE: $12k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$702k · 20 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2026, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
6

Total granted

$702k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

25%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KH
    KICKAPOO HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $150k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LACROSSE
    5× · 2022–2026 · $109k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON
    5× · 2022–2026 · $102k

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIV OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • MS
    MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • MA
    MADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lafayette College

Chartered in 1826, lafayette college is dedicated to excellence in undergraduate education. students are engaged in a transformative educational experience that bridges the liberal arts, engineering, and interdisciplinary study. the…

Education
2
Randolph College Inc

See detailed description of organization's primary mission provided on schedule o

Education
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
5
University of Rio Grande

The university of rio grande/ rio grande community college is america's unique private/public institution of higher education designed to provide learners the opportunity to attain a high-quality, high-value education. our personalized,…

Education
6
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
7
Carleton College

See schedule o.founded in 1866, carleton college is a private, coeducational liberal arts college of 2,007 students located in the historic river town of northfield, minnesota. nationally recognized as the nation's top college for…

Education
8
Wisconsin Lutheran College Inc

Wisconsin lutheran college is a private, four-year liberal arts college.

—
9
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
10
Hilbert College

Hilbert college is an independent institution of higher learning that embraces its catholic franciscan heritage and values. students from diverse backgrounds are educated in liberal arts and professional programs to become informed…

Education
11
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
12
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Norbert College Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Wisconsin-Superior Alumni Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KICKAPOO HIGH SCHOOL: $149,950 · OtherKICKAPOO HIGH SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LACROSSE: $109,300 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LACROSSEUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON: $101,550 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISONUNIV OF WISCONSIN PLATTEVILLE: $75,500 · OtherUNIV OF WISCONSIN PLATTEVILLESOUTHWEST WISCONSIN TECH COLLEGE: $42,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST WISCONSIN TECH COLLEGEUNIV OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE: $41,000 · OtherUNIV OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEEIndividual grant recipient: $39,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY: $29,700 · Other+18 more: $137,550 · Other+18 moreVITERBO UNIVERSITY: $9,500 · EducationBELOIT COLLEGE: $8,000 · EducationST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $5,000 · EducationRIPON COLLEGE: $3,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DUBUQUE: $1,700 · EducationROCHESTER COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEG: $1,550 · Education
Other$725,800Education$28,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLORAS COLLEGE: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVITERBO UNIVERSITY: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBELOIT COLLEGE: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRIPON COLLEGE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI ASSOC: $1,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LORAS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds VITERBO UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BELOIT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds RIPON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DUBUQUE ↗
  • Who funds ROCHESTER COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEG ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI ASSOC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tobola Educational TrustMN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tobola Educational Trust · Herb Kohl Educational Foundation Inc · Culver's Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lee Griffin Scholarship Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lee Griffin Scholarship Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lee Griffin Scholarship’s filings →

    More from the funding graph