Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lawton Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$17kReligion$17kHealth$5kPhilanthropy$3kHuman Services$3kInternational$1kScience & Tech$1kCivil Rights$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
7
States reached
$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JCC ON THE PALISADES$5,500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF NJ$1,565
CENTER AVE SYNAGOGUE$1,000
WURGWEILER SCH OF SOCIAL WORK$1,000
METROPOLITAN OPERA$850
YOUNG ISRAEL OF FT LEE$680
SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL$500
Individual grant recipient$480
FEED ISRAEL$150
NAT'L COUNCIL OF JEWISH$100
NAT'L JEWISH HEALTH$100
CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION$100
Individual grant recipient$100
SELF-HELP COMMUNITY SVC$100
THIRTEEN$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $100 → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $50 → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $50 → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $50 → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $50 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$68k · 42 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
6

Total granted

$68k
$750

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+6%

Still filing today

36%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $600 · revenue +53%
  • NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED
    5× · 2021–2025 · $600 · revenue +43%
  • HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $600 · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BORN TO RUN FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $250 · revenue +6%
  • WI
    WEITZMAN INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2020 · $100
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
5
The Jerusalem Connection
—
6
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
7
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
8
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
9
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
10
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
11
Jewish Year Abroad

To provide an education based program in israel for college age jewish young adults that will instill students with a sense of purpose, commitment & pride about

International
12
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is The Born to Run Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $13,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJCC ON THE PALISADES: $8,360 · OtherJCC ON THE PALISADESYOUNG ISRAEL OF FT LEE: $8,290 · OtherYOUNG ISRAEL OF FT LEEJEWISH FAMILY SVC: $5,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SVCIndividual grant recipient: $4,580 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMETROPOLITAN OPERA: $4,250 · OtherMETROPOLITAN OPERAWURGWEILER SCH OF SOC WK: $3,100 · OtherSHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL: $3,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF NJ: $2,295 · Other+30 more: $12,805 · Other+30 moreAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $600 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS INC: $500 · InternationalGENERAL ISRAEL ORPHAN HOME FOR GIRLS: $275 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $100 · InternationalAmerican Heart Association Inc: $600 · HealthSharsheret Inc: $600 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $225 · HealthNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $600 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $200 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $600 · Community ImprovementHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $600 · ReligionFEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $275 · PhilanthropyTHE BORN TO RUN FOUNDATION INC: $250 · Philanthropy
Other$65,080International$1,475Health$1,425Arts & Culture$800Community Improvement$600Religion$600Philanthropy$525

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetB NAI B RITH: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS INC: $500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY: $300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGENERAL ISRAEL ORPHAN HOME FOR GIRLS: $275 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $275 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BORN TO RUN FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $225 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetELDERHOSTEL INC: $200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds B NAI B RITH ↗
  • Who funds Sharsheret Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds GENERAL ISRAEL ORPHAN HOME FOR GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds FEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BORN TO RUN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY11.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lawton Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lawton Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Center for Food Action in New Jersey: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lawton Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Lawton Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lawton Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph