· Public charity
Lawrence Memorial Hospital Inc
To improve the health of the region and to provide healthcare services.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $93,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $319,730 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $226,230 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRESH NEW LONDON CO TSNE | $75,000 |
| DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR SCHOLARSHIP TRUST FUND | $12,500 |
| HISPANIC ALLIANCE OF SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC3× · 2018–2024 · $200k · revenue +82%- NLNEW LONDON HOMELESS HOSPITALITY CENTER2× · 2017–2023 · $68k · revenue +161%
- COChamber of Commerce of Eastern Connecticut Inc4× · 2018–2021 · $60k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- TCTHE CITY OF NEW LONDONone grant, 2017 · $50k
- HFHabitat for Humanity of Eastern Connecticut Incone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -7%
- UCUNITED COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICESINCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To compete aggressively and successfully for jobs, talent and capital.
To foster collaborations to ensure a highly educated, diverse and sustainable nursing workforce to support the healthcare needs of connecticut residents.
The purpose of the "Society" is to collect, preserve, and interpret Wethersfield's past for the education and enjoyment of present and future generations.
Business working together to promote regional prosperity and community vitality.
To attain the highest ethical and professional standards among our members, to support members in building and improving their real estate practices, to promote real estate ownership, to advocate for the protection of private property…
The connecticut housing coalition works to expand housing opportunity and to increase the quantity and quality of affordable housing available to people with low and moderate incomes in connecticut through advocacy, education and…
The Universal Health Care Foundation's mission is to be a catalyst that engages people and communities in shaping a democratic health system that provides universal access to quality health care and promotes health in Connecticut. The…
The Connecticut League of History Organizations, DBA the Connecticut League of Museums, unifies and strengthens our state's museums and cultural resources to expand their life capacity and community impact. We are the premier destination…
Eastern connecticut housing opportunities, inc. is a non-profit organization organized to provide affordable housing to low-income families of southeastern connecticut.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connecticut Cancer Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds NEW LONDON HOMELESS HOSPITALITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Chamber of Commerce of Eastern Connecticut Inc ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Eastern Connecticut Inc ↗
- Who funds MYSTIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE EASTERN CONNECTICUT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICESINC ↗
- Who funds Children's Museum of Southeastern Connecticut Inc ↗
- Who funds SEA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DR MARTIN LUTHER KING SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds MEMORIAL AND LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF WESTERLY ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds NEW LONDON ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE IN FOCUS INC ↗
- Who funds THREE RIVERS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF EASTERN CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds Hispanic Alliance of Southeastern Connecticut Inc ↗
- Who funds Garde Arts Center Inc ↗
- Who funds OCEAN COMMUNITY YMCA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Eastern Connecticut Inc · Chelsea Groton Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Edward and Mary Lord Foundation · Dime Bank Foundation Inc · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · Connecticut Humanities Council Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Kitchings Family Foundation · Sea Research Foundation Inc · Jewett City Savings Bank Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lawrence Memorial Hospital Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- New London Homeless Hospitality Center — 47% of income from government
- United Community and Family Servicesinc — 29% of income from government
- Chamber of Commerce of Eastern Connecticut Inc — 23% of income from government
- Garde Arts Center Inc — 10% of income from government
- Dr Martin Luther King Scholarship Fund — 8% of income from government
- Sea Research Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
- Hispanic Alliance of Southeastern Connecticut Inc — 4% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.