Skip to content
Lawrence J and Dora P Chastang Charitable Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Lawrence J and Dora P Chastang Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

International$83kEducation$21kRecreation & Sports$20kReligion$9kHuman Services$4kCommunity Improvement$3kPhilanthropy$2kEmployment$750Other$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$21,750
Median grant
2
States reached
$172k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLOBAL TIES US$21,750
VALHALLA FOOTBALL BOOSTER CLUB$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SOVEREIGN MILITARY ORDER OF THE TEMPLE OF JERUSALEM: $5k → 14%GP USA: $3k → 13%GLOBAL TIES US: $22k → 14%FAITH ASSEMBLY OF GOD: $1k → 13%SKILLS CENTER ELITE: $750 → 13%CAROLINA JARA: $3k → 13%FICPA SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $5k → 19%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1k → 21%THE SOCIETY OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS FELLOWS: $3k → 13%SOVEREIGN MILITARY ORDER OF THE TEMPLE OF JERUSALEM: $3k → 14%GLOBAL TIES US: $15k → 14%YMCA: $4k → 13%FICPA SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $5k → 19%GLOBAL TIES US: $10k → 14%GLOBAL CONNECTIONS FOUNDATION: $11k → 13%GLOBAL TIES US: $10k → 14%WORLD ORLANDO: $8k → 13%GLOBAL TIES US: $5k → 14%WORLD ORLANDO: $5k → 13%PEOPLE WHO MAKE A DIFFERENCE: $1k → 13%PEOPLE WHO MAKE A DIFFERENCE: $1k → 13%WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $8k → 13%VALHALLA FOOTBALL BOOSTER CLUB: $10k → 13%VALHALLA FOOTBALL BOOSTER CLUB: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$122k · 6 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$122k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+83%

Still filing today

83%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalCommunity ImprovementEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GT
    GLOBAL TIES US
    5× · 2019–2025 · $61k · revenue +40%
  • WI
    WORLDORLANDO INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $21k · revenue +110%
  • FS
    FICPA SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +216%

Funded once

  • GC
    GLOBAL CONNECTIONS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue 0% · 64% of their budget
  • Y
    YMCA
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • SO
    Society of International Business Fellows Ltdgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +157%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Learning Inc

Creating a more sustainable, peaceful, and just world through education, development, and exchange since 1932. as both an accredited academic institution and an international ngo, world learning, inc. offers the best of theory and practice…

International
2
Institute of International Bankers

The iib represents the interests of the international banking community before u.s. legislative/regulatory bodies liaises with international regulatory bodies serves as a source of information to the media and other interested parties…

—
3
American Association of State Colleges and Universities

Aascu is a washington, d.c. based higher education association that represents the sector of over 500 regional public colleges, universities, and systems whose members share a learning and teaching centered culture, a commitment to…

Education
4
Council of International Programs Usa

Promotes international understanding through professional development and cross-cultural exchange. cipusa is an international exchange organization based in cleveland, ohio with a network of affiliate offices nationwide and an alumni…

International
5
Global Partners
Human Services
6
Association of Jesuit Colleges and Universities

To support and promote u.s. jesuit higher education by facilitating cooperative efforts among, and providing services to, its member institutions; providing a forum for the exchange of experience and information; and representing the work…

—
7
International Student Conferences Inc

The mission of international student conferences, inc. is to promote peace by furthering mutual understanding, friendship, and trust through international student interchange.

International
8
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
9
Council of the Americas Inc

Council of the americas is a business organization whose members share a common commitment to economic and social development, open markets, the rule of law, and democracy throughout the americas. the council's membership consists of…

—
10
Young Global Leadership Foundation

Global education programs

—
11
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
12
Zeta Tau Alpha Fraternity

To maintain fraternity chapters internationally.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Ties Us; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GLOBAL TIES US: $61,250 · InternationalGLOBAL TIES USGLOBAL CONNECTIONS FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 · OtherGLOBAL CONNECTIONS FOUNDATION INCFICPA SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherFICPA SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INCSOVEREIGN MILITARY ORDER OFTHE TEMPLE OF JERUSALEM: $7,750 · OtherSOVEREIGN MILITARY ORDER OFTHE TE…YMCA: $3,500 · OtherYMCASociety of International Business Fellows Ltd: $2,500 · OtherSociety of International Business…Individual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPEOPLE WHO MAKE A DIFFERENCE: $2,000 · Other+2 more: $1,750 · OtherWORLDORLANDO INC: $21,000 · Community ImprovementWORLDORLANDO INCVALHALLA FOOTBALL BOOSTER CLUB INC: $20,000 · EducationVALHALLA FOOTBA…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 · Religion
International$61,250Other$43,500Community Improvement$21,000Education$20,000Religion$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBAL TIES US: $61,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWORLDORLANDO INC: $21,000 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetVALHALLA FOOTBALL BOOSTER CLUB INC: $20,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetGLOBAL CONNECTIONS FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 1y, 64% of budgetFICPA SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetSOVEREIGN MILITARY ORDER OFTHE TEMPLE OF JERUSALEM: $7,750 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSociety of International Business Fellows Ltd: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lawrence J and Dora P Chastang Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lawrence J and Dora P Chastang Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lawrence J and Dora P Chastang Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Lawrence J and Dora P Chastang Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lawrence J and Dora P Chastang’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home