Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Lawrence Habitat for Humanity

The organization is a nondenominational christian nonprofit whose purpose is to create decent, affordable housing for those in need, and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience with people everywhere.

$162k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$102k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212023.

Housing & Shelter$388k
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $58k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $102k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WICHITA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$102,283
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HARVEY CO$20,000
MCPHERSON AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$20,000
MANHATTAN AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$18,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 74% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HARVEY CO: $20k → 9%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF FRANKLIN CO: $16k → 10%MCPHERSON AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $20k → 10%MARSHALL COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANIT: $15k → 11%TOPEKA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $15k → 14%RIVERBEND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $15k → 15%WICHITA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $102k → 16%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ARK CITY: $15k → 16%EMPORIA AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $15k → 16%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CRAWFORD CT: $15k → 18%MANHATTAN AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $18k → 20%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KANSAS CITY: $15k → 15%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HARVEY CTY: $15k → 9%MCPHERSON AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $15k → 10%TOPEKA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $7k → 14%WICHITA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $27k → 16%WINFIELD AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $15k → 16%MANHATTAN AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $15k → 20%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KANSAS CITY: $12k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$247k · 5 repeat orgs$141k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$247k
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
-7%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MCPHERSON AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $35k · revenue +165%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE NORTHERN FLINT HILLS INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $33k · revenue +47%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KANSAS CITY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $27k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF FRANKLIN COUNTY
    one grant, 2022 · $16k · revenue 0% · 42% of their budget
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL EMPORIA AREA
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -11%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HARVEY COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat for Humanity International Scotts Bluff County

Most construction work is performed by volunteers

2
Habitat for Humanity of Worcester County Inc

To build and rehabilitate houses which are sold to low-income families through no-interest loans

3
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

4
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

To put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

5
Habitat for Humanity Greater Wenatchee Area

Our mission is to provide decent and affordable housing to eligible families in partnership with god, the families and our community.

6
Habitat for Humanity of Grant County Inc

To create decent affordable housing for those in need and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience with people everywhere.

7
Habitat for Humanity International Wabash County Hfh

Wabash county habitat for humanity, inc. is a non-profit organization working in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to build decent, affordable housing.

8
Habitat for Humanity International

To provide affordbale housing to low income families along with zero interest mortgage

9
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

To eliminate poverty, housing and homelessness from the face of the earth by constructing and building adequate and basic housing.

10
Habitat for Humanity Pennyrile Region Inc

To provide affordable housing and financing to low income families.

Housing & Shelter
11
Habitat for Humanity of Peconic Inc

To sponsor specific construction of modest but adequate housing for working families unable to qualify for traditional mortgages.

12
Habitat for Humanity the Wind River Country

The organization builds homes for low income families.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mcpherson Area Habitat for Humanity Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Fuller Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MCPHERSON AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $35,000 · OtherMCPHERSON AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE NORTHERN FLINT HILLS INC — $33,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE NORTHERN FLINT HILLS INCTOPEKA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $22,250 · OtherTOPEKA HABITAT FOR HUMANITYHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HARVEY CO — $20,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HARVEY COHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF FRANKLIN COUNTY — $16,200 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF FRANKLIN COUNTYHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL EMPORIA AREA — $15,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL EMPORIA AREAHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HARVEY COUNTY INC — $15,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HARVEY COUNTY INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ARKANSAS CITY — $15,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ARKANSAS CITYWINFIELD AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $15,000 · OtherWINFIELD AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITYMARSHALL COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ASSOCIATION — $15,000 · OtherMARSHALL COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ASSOCIATIONWICHITA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $129,383 · Housing & ShelterWICHITA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KANSAS CITY — $27,100 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KANSAS CITYTHE FULLER CENTER — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE FULLER CENTERHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CRAWFORD COUNTY KANSAS — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CRAWFORD COUNTY KANSAS
Other$201,450Housing & Shelter$186,483

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWICHITA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $129,383 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetMCPHERSON AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $35,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE NORTHERN FLINT HILLS INC — $33,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KANSAS CITY — $27,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTOPEKA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $22,250 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF FRANKLIN COUNTY — $16,200 over 1y, 42% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL EMPORIA AREA — $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HARVEY COUNTY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ARKANSAS CITY — $15,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetTHE FULLER CENTER — $15,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CRAWFORD COUNTY KANSAS — $15,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Habitat for Humanity International IncGA25.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Habitat for Humanity International Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lawrence Habitat for Humanity funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph